Boycott Brazil

PLEASE COPY AND PASTE THE ABOVE LOGO ON YOUR SITE AND THROUGHOUT THE INTERNET.
Thank you for your support.

The Extradition, Torture and
Electronic Mind Control
of U.S. Citizen
John Gregory Lambros,
a Native of Minnesota

Go directly to a third-party explanation of
what happened to John Gregory Lambros.

What's new?

DECEMBER 28, 2013: THOMAS JOSEPH PETTERS informs United States District Court for the District of Minnesota that jailhouse lawyer John Gregory Lambros will assert and litigate PETTERS denial of his Title 28 U.S.C. 2255, by the Honorable Judge Richard H. Kyle on December 5, 2013. PETTERS was a prominent Minneapolis, Minnesota businessman who owned numerous businesses, including Petters Group Worldwide LLC (PGW), Sun Country Airlines, Polaroid Corporation, Fingerhut, and Petters Company, Inc. (PCI), who was convicted of a alleged massive $3.65 billion Ponzi scheme. Judge Kyle sentenced Petters to 50 years of imprisonment after a month-long trial. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW THE MOTIONS LAMBROS FILES FOR PETTERS.

DECEMBER 9, 2013: Lambros files "PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI" as to October 4, 2013 "ORDER AND JUDGMENT" by U.S. Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit that affirmed the district court's order in dismissal of WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA. Lambros' writ of certiorari offers an excellent overview as to the illegal sentencing information the government used within two (2) plea agreements it offered Lambros, in violation of the considerations set out by the Supreme Court in MISSOURI vs. FRYE and LAFLER vs. COOPER. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.

OCTOBER 4, 2013: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denies Lambros' WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA. See, JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. CLAUDE MAYE, No. 13-3159. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.

August 28, 2013: Lambros appeals the denial of his WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. John Gregory Lambros vs. Claude Maye, Warden, Docket No. 13-3159 (2013). CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.

July 1, 2013: Richard D. Rogers, U.S. District Court Judge issues "ORDER" and denies Lambros' Rule 59(e), Writ of Audita Querela. LAMBROS vs. MAYE, Warden, Civil Docket No. 13-3034-RDR. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.

JUNE 5, 2013: Lambros files "MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT OF COUNT'S "MEMORANDUM AND ORDER" FILED ON MAY 17, 2013, PURSUANT TO RULE 59(e) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE." LAMBROS vs. CLAUDE MAYE, Warden, Civil Docket No. 13-3034-RDR. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.

MAY 17, 2013: Richard D. Rogers, United States District Judge responds to Lambros' February 26, 2013 petition for Habeas Corpus and/or Writ of Audita Querela within his "MEMORANDUM AND ORDER." LAMBROS vs. CLAUDE MAYE, Warden, Civil Docket No. 13-3034-RDR. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.

APRIL 2, 2013: Lambros response to "UNITED STATES RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION TO FILE SUCCESSIVE 2255 HABEAS PETITION" dated March 22, 2013. LAMBROS vs. USA, Civil Docket No. 13-1561, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.

MARCH 22, 2013: United States Attorney B. Todd Jones and Assistant United States Attorney Ann M. Anaya "RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT [Lambros'] APPLICATION TO FILE SUCCESSIVE SECTION 2255 HABEAS PETITION." LAMBROS vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 13-1561, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.

MARCH 7, 2013: Lambros files "MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE .... 2255", as to USA vs. LAMBROS, Criminal Docket No.'s 3-76-17 and 3-75-128, U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW.

FEBRUARY 26, 2013 - PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN FEDERAL CUSTODY - Title 28 U.S.C. 2241; AND/OR "WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA" - under the "All Writs Act", Title 28 U.S.C. 1651(a). JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. CLAUDE MAYE, Warden for U.S. Penitentiary Leavenworth, Civil Docket No. 5:13-cv-3034-RDR, U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. This motion is twenty (20) pages in length which includes the cover letter. Also attached is the "INDEX AND EXHIBITS" MOTION which is three (3) pages in length NOT INCLUDING THE EXHIBITS. Please note that the exhibits are all available in the above postings. THIS MOTION WAS FILED DUE TO THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS REFUSING TO MAKE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATE CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AS REQUIRED BY LAW. Therefore, Lambros' 28 U.S.C. 2255 was "INADEQUATE AND/OR INEFFECTIVE" thus offering Lambros a remedy of law within the federal court where he is incarcerated. This document is a total of twenty three (23) pages in PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 26, 2013 - LAMBROS' "WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS" and/or "WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA" - HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

November 5, 2012 - "MOTION FOR RECUSAL OF CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE DIANA MURPHY FROM THE JUDGMENT IN THIS ABOVE-ENTITLED ACTION PURSUANT TO TITLE 28 U.S.C. 9 455 et. al."

NOVEMBER 5, 2012 - "PETITION FOR REHEARING (FRAP 40) WITH SUGGESTION FOR PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (FRAP 35)".

Lambros files the above two motion due to the October 24, 2012 denial of his request to file a successive habeas application in the district court. Please note that Judge Diana Murphy denied Lambros' request which is not legal, as she was the District Court Judge that ORIGINALLY CONDUCTED THE TRIAL AND SENTENCING OF LAMBROS IN THIS ACTION. A JUDGE CANNOT JUDGE HIS OR HER OWN WORK! Lambros has requested that the panel of judges vacate the order and assign a new three judge panel to review Lambros' request. Also, of interest is the fact the panel of judges DID NOT offer an opinion within the denial, when the law requires the court to state the REASONS FOR DENIAL EITHER BY INFORMAL MEMORANDUM, BY RECITAL IN AN ORDER, OR BY FINDINGS. The above motions are thirteen (13) pages total, which includes a cover letter to the court and two pages of exhibits. This document is in PDF FORMAT. JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. USA, No. 12-2427 (8th Circuit Court of Appeals)

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 5, 2012 - LAMBROS' "MOTION FOR RECUSAL" AND "PETITION FOR REHEARING' - HERE IN PDF.

OCTOBER 24, 2012 - LAMBROS' "PETITION FOR SUCCESSIVE 5 2255" IS DENIED."

Circuit Court Judges Diana Murphy, SMITH and BENTON denied Lambros successive 2255 without offering the reasons for denial either by informal memorandum, by recital in an order, or by findings - as required by law. See, Title 28 U.S.C. 2255 "....... DETERMINE THE ISSUES AND MAKE FINDINGS OF FACT AND WITH RESPECT THERETO. ..." JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. USA, No. 12-2427.

DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 24, 2012 - "JUDGMENT" BY U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR EIGHTH CIRCUIT - HERE IN PDF.

October 17, 2012 - "SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO INFORM COURT OF NEW RELEVANT PUBLISHED HOLDING THAT CONTAINS PERSUASIVE VALUE ON THE ONLY ISSUE IN THIS ACTION - U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APPLY LAFLER vs. COOPER, 132 S. Ct. 1376 (2012) AND MISSOURI vs. FRYE, 132 S. Ct. 1399 (2012) RETROACTIVELY."

Lambros informs the Eighth Circuit of the September 28, 2012, OPINION in TYRONE W. MILES vs. MICHAEL MARTEL, WARDEN, No. 10-15633, by Circuit Judge Betty B. Fletcher of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, who applied the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions in LAFLER vs. COOPER and MISSOURI vs. FRYE, RETROACTIVELY. "By applying this holding in LAFLER, a habeas petition subject to AEDPA, the Court necessarily implied that this holding applies to habeas petitioners WHOSE CASES ARE ALREADY FINAL ON DIRECT REVIEW; i.e. THAT THE HOLDING APPLIES RETROACTIVELY." This is a short motion with an exhibit containing portions of MILES vs. MARTEL, as to the application of RETROACTIVE APPLICATION. The motion is 4 pages with cover letter and 4 pages of exhibits - 8 pages total. This document is in PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 17, 2012 - LAMBROS' "SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION" AS TO RETROACTIVITY ISSUE WITHIN 2255 - HERE IN PDF.

July 23, 2012 - "UNITED STATES RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT LAMBROS' APPLICATION TO FILE SUCCESSIVE SECTION 2255 HABEAS PETITION", DATED: July 23, 2012.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann M. Anaya and U.S. Attorney B. Todd Jones respond to John Lambros June 8, 2012 "MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255(f)(3) and 2255(h)(2) BY A PRISONER IN FEDERAL CUSTODY." Please note that the District Court Clerk for the District of Minnesota did not file Lambros' motion and mailed it directly to the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, Case No. 12-2427. The government's motion is ten (10) pages and nineteen (19) pages of exhibit - 29 pages total. This document is in PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD JULY 23, 2012 GOVERNMENT RESPONSE MOTION TO LAMBROS' 5 2255, HERE IN PDF.

August 13, 2012 - "MOVANT LAMBROS' RESPONSE TO "UNITED STATES RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION TO FILE SUCCESSIVE SECTION 2255 HABEAS PETITION" - DATED: July 23, 2012."

Lambros response to the government's response and requests that United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit to proceed in this action, as the government has ADMITTED TO ALL THE ALLEGATIONS WITHIN LAMBROS' 2255, due to violations of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 10(b) and Rule 8(b) and Rule 8(d). THIS IS AN EXCELLENT MOTION THAT HIGHLIGHTS FACTS COVERED-UP BY THE U.S. Department of State and the Government's use of the incorrect criminal statutes against Lambros. This motion is 19 pages in length with another 1 page cover letter and 15 pages of exhibits - 35 pages total. This document is in PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD AUGUST 13, 2012 - LAMBROS' RESPONSE TO U.S. GOVERNMENTS RESPONSE IN JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DOCKET NO. 12-2427, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

JUNE 8, 2012 - Lambros files "MOTION TO LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AND SUCCESSIVE MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255(f)(3) and 2255(h)(2)."

On March 21, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down two (2) decisions that expanded the opportunities for defendants to overturn their convictions on the basis of POST-CONVICTION CLAIMS that their attorneys did an unreasonably poor job during PLEA NEGOTIATIONS. Defendants who can show that their attorneys failed to give them competent counsel regarding plea offers CAN GET A LOWER SENTENCE OR HAVE THE PROSECUTOR RE-EXTEND THE PLEA OFFER, EVEN IF THE DEFENDANT RECEIVED A FAIR TRIAL AFTER THEY REJECTED THE OFFER, THE COURT MAKES CLEAR. See, MISSOURI v. FRYE, 132 S. Ct. 1399; and LAFLER v. COOPER, 132 S. Ct. 1376. Lambros' counsel stated during the government's PLEA OFFER that the only sentence Lambros could receive was a MANDATORY LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE. This was not true. CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF MOTION.

February 22, 2012 - New Zealand gives BAIL to persons awaiting extradition to United States - Brazil doesn't!!! Kim Dotcom, the founder of website Megaupload.com, has been released on BAIL in New Zealand as he awaits a decision on whether he will be extradited to the United States to face RACKETEERING, MONEY LAUNDERING, COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND WIRE FRAUD CHARGES. Six (6) others charged within the same indictment have already been released on bail. Kim Dotcom was lucky that he wasn't in Brazil when he was arrested, as Brazil will not even give a person waiting extradition to the United States a BAIL HEARING. CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF ARTICLES.

November 17, 2011 - PORTUGAL WON'T EXTRADITE U.S. CITIZEN TO U.S.: Portuguese Court denied the U.S. request to extradite George Wright to the U.S. for hijacking a jet to Algeria in 1972. CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF THE ARTICLE.

December 7, 2011 - AMERICAN CONVICTED IN MEXICO OF DRUG TRAFFICKING WAS TORTURED WHILE IN MEXICAN CUSTODY WAS FREED BY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE: Shohn Huckabee, 24, and his friend Carlos Quijas were arrested and convicted of drug trafficking in Mexico in December 2009. After being arrested by Mexican military they were beaten, subjected to electric shock and threatened with death. Huckabee was transferred to the U.S. and released by the U.S. Parole Commission due to his "torture[Ed] in foreign custody". Carlos Quijas is awaiting a similar transfer and release. CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF THE ARTICLE.

December 16, 2010 - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange: Julian Assange - the Australian - was freed on bail from London's High Court as Sweden pushes its case for extradition. Assange was being held on a warrant for his extradition to Sweden. PLEASE NOTE THAT BRAZIL WOULD NOT OF GIVEN JULIAN ASSANGE A BAIL HEARING OR BAIL FOR EXTRADITION. LAMBROS HAD BAIL SET BY THE UNITED STATES WITHIN THE ARREST WARRANT AND BRAZIL REFUSED TO HOLD A BAIL HEARING. CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF THE ARTICLE ON BAIL IN LONDON FOR ASSANGE.

FEBRUARY 19, 2010 - HUGO CHAVEZ, President of Venezuela: This is the letter John Gregory Lambros wrote President Chavez as to "INJURY IN FACT" being committed by the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Justice IN NOT HONORING EXTRADITION DECREES FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF VENEZUELA IN EXTRADITION PROCEEDINGS TO THE UNITED STATES. Venezuela does not allow a criminal sentence greater than 30-YEARS and the Supreme Court of Venezuela states in every extradition decree that the person will not be sentenced to more than 30-YEARS. When the extradited person from Venezuela reaches the U.S. Court system they are given sentences greater than 30-YEARS. - CRISTOBAL RODRIGUEZ BENITEZ, 19-years to life - Lambros also offers case law that GRANTS BAIL WHEN THE U.S. REQUESTS EXTRADITION OF PERSONS IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES. See Page 9 of letter. Lambros requests President Chavez to contact his Attorney General - LUISA ORTEGA DIAZ - to AMEND the U.S.-Venezuela Extradition Treaty to incorporate a penalty clause of $100,000.00 per-day for all breaches to agreed-upon sentencing limitations (30-year sentences). CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF THE FEBRUARY 19, 2010 LETTER.

OCTOBER 05, 2009 - EMMET G. SULLIVAN, U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, for the District of Columbia, REFUSES TO FILE "JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A PETITION OF INTERVENTION - OR ALTERNATIVELY - JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS' MOTION TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF," dated September 14, 2009. Lambros raises the question of law "Whether the term of "SUPERVISED RELEASE" must be included within the maximum thirty (30) year sentence limitation as expressed in extradition ORDERS from COLOMBIA, BRAZIL, and VENEZUELA. This motion and refusal to file order was submitted in the case of USA vs. WILBER ALIRITO VARELA, DIEGO LEON MONTOYA-SANCHEZ, LUIS HERNANDO GOMEZ-BUSTAMANTE, ARCANGEL HENAO-MONTOYA, JUAN CARLOS RAMIREZ-ABADIA (arrested in Brazil & awaiting extradition), CARLOS ALBERTO RENTERIA-MANTILLA, GABRIEL PUERTA-PARRA, JORGE ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ-ACERO, and JAIRO APARICIO-LENIS, criminal docket number 04-126. CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF MOTION AND ORDER (signed on cover-page of letter to clerk) BY JUDGE SULLIVAN.

AUGUST 7, 2009 - LORETTA A. PRESKA, U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, for the Southern District of New York, REFUSES TO FILE "JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A PETITION OF INTERVENTION - OR ALTERNATIVELY - JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF. Dated July 29, 2009." Lambros raises the question of law: "Whether the term of SUPERVISED RELEASE must be included within the maximum thirty (30) year sentence limitation as expressed in extradition ORDERS and TREATIES from COLOMBIA." This motion and refusal to file order was submitted in case USA vs. DANIEL RENDON-HERRERA, FREDDY ENRIQUE RENDON-HERRERA, JHON JAIRO RENDON-HERRERA, DIEGO RIVAS-ANGEL, DATRO ANTONIO USUGA-DAVID, JUAN DE DIOS USUGADAVID, criminal docket numbers 04-CR-962 (LAP) and 08-CR-659 (SAS). CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF MOTION and ORDER BY JUDGE PRESKA.

March 2, 2009 - LAMBROS REQUESTS MIAMI FEDERAL COURT to allow Petition of Intervention or alternatively Amicus Curiae brief regarding extradition cases from COLOMBIA, BRAZIL, and VENEZUELA, as to the question of law: "Whether the term of SUPERVISED RELEASE must be included within the maximum thirty (30) year sentence limitation as expressed in extradition orders and treaties?" CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF MOTION.

November 17, 2008, LUIS IGNACIO GUZMAN, Consul General for Colombia. Lambros writes Consul General Guzman thanking him for responding to his June 03, 2008 letter and offers additional law as to persons being sentenced to MORE than thirty (30) years when the term of "SUPERVISED RELEASE" is included within the term of imprisonment. Therefore, an injury in fact to all persons extradited from Colombia to the United States, as per the extradition decrees by the Colombian Supreme Court. Colombia is also advised of the current extradition of PABLO JOAQUIN RAYO-MONTANO, a citizen of Colombia, from Brazil to the USA and Brazil's Supreme Court's past failure to enforce a thirty (30) year criminal sentence when extraditing persons to the United States. Consul Guzman's July 30, 2008 letter is attached as an exhibit. CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF LETTER.

The following affiliated websites supporting the Boycott of Brazil due to the illegal extradition, torture, and mind control of John Gregory Lambros, by Brazil, have new domain addresses:

Boycott Brazil Index: www.BoycottBrazil.com
False Beliefs: www.FalseBeliefs.BoycottBrazil.com
Brazil Lien Account: www.BrazilLien.BoycottBrazil.com
Legal Notice of Fraud and Deceit By Attorney Colia F. Ceisel: www.FraudByCeisel.BoycottBrazil.com
Boycott Orange Juice from Brazil: www.BoycottBrazilOJ.BoycottBrazil.com
Boycott Soybeans from Brazil: www.BrazilSoybeans.BoycottBrazil.com
Minnesota Legal Shysters: www.LegalShysters.BoycottBrazil.com
Brazil Legal Shysters: www.BrazilShysters.BoycottBrazil.com

June 03, 2008, CONSULADO GENERAL de COLOMBIA. Lambros requests the Consulate General for Colombia to investigate the illegal conduct of U.S. Attorney's and Court's when they sentence persons extradited from Colombia to sentences of more than thirty (30) years when they include the term of "SUPERVISED RELEASE" in addition to the term of imprisonment. The Supreme Court of Colombia does not allow U.S. Court's to sentence persons extradited from Colombia to be sentenced to more than thirty (30) years, as per the resolutions within every extradition decree. CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF LETTER.

August - September 2007, "GRAND OPENING!" of Boycott Brazil's FREE CLASSIFIED AD website, www.nopayclassifieds.com.

The new free classified and Local Business Directory advertising site covers 50 countries and all zip and postal codes within each country. We believe this site could lead to new sources of exposure for BOYCOTT BRAZIL. John Lambros is requesting that all supporters "SPREAD THE WORD" and GO THERE AND ADD A FREE CLASSIFIED AD OR LISTING FOR YOUR BUSINESS. It will take only five minutes. Thank you!" Click here for the August-September 2007, PRESS RELEASE "Free Online 'Local Business Directory' And Classified Advertising Site Covers 50 Countries - A Click Away!!!"

April 05, 2007, Lambros submits a complaint against Attorney ANDREA G. HOFFMAN, Miami, Florida to THE FLORIDA BAR, requesting investigation of ethical conduct by Attorney HOFFMAN in preventing the enforcement of U.S. Criminal Statutes as defined by the U.S. Congress and punishments prescribed therefor, in the illegal extradition of PABLO JOAQUIN RAYO-MONTANO from Brazil. Click here for more information and copy of letter and complaint.

February 08, 2007, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ORDERS the August 17, 1988 ORDER by the Supreme Court of Venezuela UNENFORCEABLE as to* BENITIZ not receiving a penalty of more than thirty (30) years, if convicted in the United States. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Venezuela had communicated the conditions of BENITIZ extradition to the United States with the understanding that a sentence could not exceed thirty (30) years to no avail. CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF LEGAL OPINION BY NINTH CIRCUIT, BENITIZ vs. GARCIA, 476 F.3d 676 (9th Cir. 2007).

March 27, 2007, letter from Lambros to ANDREA G. HOFFMAN, Assistant U.S. Attorney in Miami, Florida. Attorney HOFFMAN is the governments' attorney in the illegal extradition of PABLO JOAQUIN RAYO-MONTANO from BRAZIL. USA vs. PABLO JOAQUIN RAYO- MONTANO, Criminal No. 06-20139, Southern District of Florida. Lambros places Attorney HOFFMAN on NOTICE as to her illegal actions before filing complaints with the courts.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF LETTER.

August 13, 2006, letter from Lambros to his SUPPORTERS regarding PABLO JOAQUIN RAYO-MONTANO. This letter outlines the sentences RAYO-MONTANO will receive if extradited from Brazil, LIFE SENTENCE, and the PENALTY SHEET signed by Assistant United States Attorney ANDREA G. HOFFMAN stating same. The indictment is also attached for your review. PLEASE DISTRIBUTE THIS DOCUMENT THROUGHOUT BRAZIL via www.ORKUT.COM (almost 70% Brazilians)
CLICK HERE FOR COPY OF ARTICLE.

MAY - JUNE 2006, "GRAND OPENING" OF NEW WEB SITE: John Lambros and supporters of Boycott Brazil are pleased to announce the "GRAND OPENING" rollout of our global portal database to divert landfill waste for reuse, by identifying usable items and those who will receive them. Please help us spread the word about: www.FreeRetiredStuff.com

PRESS RELEASE - MAY-JUNE 2006, "GRAND OPENING" This document is in PDF FORMAT.

PRESS RELEASE January 15, 2007: "FREE ONLINE CLASSIFIED NEWSPAPER ALLOWS 3.8 BILLION PEOPLE'S TRASH TO BE ANOTHER'S TREASURE - WITHIN 21 NEW MARKETS!" This document is in PDF FORMAT.

May 18, 2006, PABLO RAYO-MONTANO arrested in Brazil by DEA for extradition to USA. Will Brazil extradite RAYO-MONTANO to the USA when he can only receive a life sentence that Brazil does not allow? CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COPY OF ARTICLE.

February 28, 2006, Filed March 2, 2006, WRIT OF CERTIORARI in LAMBROS vs. U.S., U.S. Supreme Court Number 05-9611. Lambros is requesting the Supreme Court to rule CASTRO vs. U.S., 157 L.Ed.2d 778 (2003) retroactive and allow CASTRO to apply to Pro Se Motion when the inmate was also represented by an attorney. This Document is a total of seventy-nine (79) pages. The question presented to the Supreme Court, "WHETHER LA14BROS WAS DENIED HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AS EMBODIED WITHIN THE CONSTITUTION, ART. 1, Section 9, Cl. 2." CLICK HERE to go directly to the above motion within the homepage.

DOES BOYCOTT BRAZIL NEED A NEW LOGO???? Attached for your downloading are several new logos BOYCOTT BRAZIL is considering for this site. In fact, BOYCOTT BRAZIL may incorporate several logos!!!!! Please write John Gregory Lambros with your thoughts. THANK YOU!!!!
VIEW NEW LOGOS FOR BOYCOTT BRAZIL HERE.

GENERAL ELECTRIC'S COMMERCIAL FINANCE WILL NOT DO BUSINESS IN BRAZIL DUE TO BRAZIL'S UNSTABLE GOVERNMENT AND LEGAL SYSTEM THAT DOES NOT PROTECT THE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF FOREIGNERS. CLICK HERE to go directly to more information within this homepage. It appears Brazil denies due process to all foreigners.

September 27, 2005, Lambros' files "MOTION FOR RELIEF DUE TO INTERVENING CHANGE IN CONTROLLING LAW, U.S. vs. BOOKER, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)." The Supreme Court stated the Sentencing Guidelines violated the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution in that it conflicts with the accused right to a jury trial. Lambros' sentence could not be increased from one guideline range to another based on facts not proved by a jury. Therefore, Lambros' two (2) THIRTY (30) YEAR SENTENCES SHOULD BE REDUCED TO TEN (10) YEARS, THE SAME AS THE TWO (2) COUNTS THAT OCCURRED BEFORE THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES TOOK EFFECT ON NOVEMBER 01., 1987. CLICK HERE to go directly to the above motion within the homepage.

February 15, 2005, Lambros files the following motion with the District Court in Minnesota, "MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT OR ORDER, DUE TO INTERVENING CHANGE IN CONTROLLING LAW, CRAWFORD vs. WASHINGTON, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (March 8, 2004)" Lambros' attorney was not allowed to interview or cross-examine the out-of-court statements entered into evidence that were testimonial in nature by DONALD HENDRICKSON (paid government informant), ROGER LEWIS, REBECCA LEWIS, and DAVID PAGEL. CLICK HERE to go directly to the above motions within the homepage. THIS RULE 60(b) MOTION IS STARTING TO GET INTERESTING AS THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ORDERED THE GOVERNMENT TO RESPOND WHEN THE DISTRICT COURT NEVER MADE A RULING AND THE DISTRICT COURT CLERK STATES SHE NEVER TRANSFERRED SAME. Lambros now offers the government's response dated April 20, 2005 and Lambros response dated April 28, 2005. Also copy of letters from the Clerks office as to which court has jurisdiction.

January 1, 2005, Boycott Brazil has registered the web site addresses: www.extradition.org and mindcontrol.us to point to this web site.

November 3, 2004 thru August 30, 2005, motions filed by government and Lambros as to intervening change in law, CASTRO vs. U.S., 157 L.Ed.2d 778 (2003). Lambros is asking the Eighth Circuit why the district court SUSPENDED HIS RIGHT TO FILE A FIRST WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, as guaranteed within the United States Constitution, Article 1, Section 9, Clause 2?y CLICK HERE to go directly to the above motions within the homepage.

November 01, 2004, Memorandum entitled, "LAMBROS COMPARED TO CHE GUEVARA." This memorandum was released to associates and supporters of BOYCOTT BRAZIL, by Ron Simmat, Public Relations Director for Boycott Brazil. THIS PDF FORMATTED ONE (1) PAGE DOCUMENT REQUIRES ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD "LAMROS COMPARED TO CHE GUEVARA" HERE IN PDF.

September 07, 2004, "MOTION TO VACATE FEBRUARY 10, 1997, JUDGMENT DUE TO INTERVENING CHANGE IN CONTROLLING LAW, CASTRO vs. U.S., 157 L.Ed.2d 778 (December 15, 2003), UNDER ANY ONE OF THREE SEPARATE SUBSECTIONS OF FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(b) - SECTIONS ONE (1), FIVE (5), AND SIX (6)." This document is a total of sixty-four (64) pages including cover letter to clerk of the court, main pleading and exhibits in LAMBROS vs. U.S., Criminal No. 4-89-82(05). This motion offers the complete sentencing transcript of the February 10, 1997 resentencing of John G. Lambros as Exhibit C. The sentencing transcript of February 10, 1997 offers an excellent overview as to the bias of Judge Robert C. Renner towards Lambros. Lambros requested Judge Renner several times for a ruling on the GENERAL JURY VERDICT issue which was required by the Eighth Circuit, U.S. vs. OWENS, 904 F.2d 411, 414415 (8th Cir. 1990), but Judge Renner refused due to the fact he could only sentence Lambros to no more than five (5) years. See pages five thru nine in the main pleading. This document is in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED BY CLICKING HERE.

July 06, 2004, PUBLIC RELEASE of January 12, 2000, confidential letter from Lambros to Judge John M. Mason and David S. Doty. This letter offers documents from Raymond H. Lavas, Technical consultant for Ted L. Gunderson and Associates, International Security Consultating and Investigation, Santa Monica, California and Dr. Antony C. Sutton, D.Sc., editor of the PHOENIX LETTER and author or over 25 books. Lambros believes the governments of Brazil and the United States have placed pressure on both individuals to keep quiet as to the documents being released. This letter is 27 pages including exhibits and being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD JANUARY 12, 2000, LETTER FROM LAMBROS TO JUDGE MASON AMD JUDGE DOTY HERE IN PDF.

July 04, 2004, MEMORANDUM TO SUPPORTERS OF BOYCOTT BRAZIL, by Ron Simmat
Public Relations Director, Boycott Brazil, entitled "MINNESOTA BAR PROTECTS STATE

COURTS: Office of Professional Responsibility Rules Minnesota Supreme Court Need Not Follow State Constitution." This memorandum is a total of six (6) pages including exhibits and being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD JULY 04,, 2004, MEMORADUM TO SUPPORTERS OF BOYCOTT BRAZIL BY RON SIMMAT HERE IN PDF.

May 06, 2004, letter from Thomas F. Ascher, Assistant Director, Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility for the Minnesota Bar Association, to Lambros. Lambros' April 29, 2004 complaint filed against the Minnesota Supreme Court Justices on August 06, 1993, as to violations of Article 1, Section 8, of the State of Minnesota Constitution in there ruling in DZIUBAK vs. MOTT, 503 N.W.2d 771, is DENIED. This letter is one (1) page and being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD MAY 06, 2004, LETTER FROM OFFICE OF LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY HERE IN PDF.

April 29, 2004, Complaint filed against Minnesota Supreme Court Justices on August 06, 1993, as to violations of Article 1, Section 8, of the State of Minnesota Constitution and the Equal Protection Clause when they wrote the opinion in DZIUBAK vs. MOTT, 503 N.W.2d 771 (Minn. 1993). The following judges where also attorneys subject to discipline as an attorney by the bar association: Alexander Keith; Rosalie Wahl, John Simonett, Esther Tomljanovich, Sandra Gardebring, Allan Page, and Jean Coyne. Also attached is copy of Lambros' May 1, 2004, letter of NOTICE to Kathleen Blatz, Chief Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court, as to this action. THE BOTTOM LINE: If there are policy reasons for immunizing public defenders from liability, the law should be changed by the legislature, NOT THE COURT. Why is State common law immunity available to public defenders when Federal common law immunity IS NOT AVAILABLE? The above listed letters are eight (8) pages with exhibits and being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD APRIL 29, 2004 COMPLAINT AGAINST MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HERE IN PDF.

January 01, 2004, Brazil announced that all United States Citizens entering Brazil will be fingerprinted and photographed, as per the order of a Brazilian Judge. This information was received from www.theworld.org.

Google and Yahoo! search engines both rank this site NUMBER ONE (#1) under the search words: BOYCOTT BRAZIL (227,000 and 268,000 results) and BRAZIL BOYCOTT (55,400 and 152,000 results), as of May 20, 2005. This site received more than one (1) million hits in 2004. Yahoo! Search reports 1,070 links to www.brazilboycott.org as of August 2005. Thank you for your support!

May 20, 2003, Lambros returns to the District Court and files a MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT DUE TO INTERVENING CHANGE IN CONTROLLING LAW. This is a continuation of Lambros' April 13, 2001 motion to vacate judgment due to violations of Title 28 U.S.C.A. 455(a) and 455(b)(3) by U.S. Judge ROBERT G. RENNER'S impartiality towards Lambros during all proceedings. CLICK HERE to go to document within this site. FOR SOME REASON THE COURT DOES NOT WANT TO CONDUCT A HEARING AT WHICH THERE WOULD BE FULL DISCLOSURE ON RECORD OF BASIS FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE RENNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 28 U.S.C.A. 455(e). WHY? See, IN RE KANSAS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, 85 F.3d 1353, 1359 (8th Cir. 1996); MORGAN vs. CLARKE, 296 F.3d 638, 648 (8th Cir. 2002); BARKSDALE vs. EMERICK, 853 F.2d 1359, 1361-1363 (6th Cir. 1988).

"WHERE'S THE JURISDICTION JUDGE ROBERT G. RENNER!" This article was published for the internet magazine JUSTICE DENIED -- The Magazine for the Falsely Convicted, as per their request on November 30, 2002. Please visit the JUSTICE DENIED web site: www.justicedenied.org. This five (5) page story with five (5) pages of exhibits, total ten pages, is being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD DECEMBER 9, 2002 ARTICLE "WHERE'S THE JURISDICTION JUDGE ROBERT G. RENNER!" HERE IN PDF.

December 1996 interview of John Gregory Lambros by "WAVE STATION X." This interview has just been released in written form in August 2003. CLICK HERE to go to document within this site.

: Please visit, sign, promote, and establish links to www.PetitionOnline.com/jlambros/petition.html which is currently hosting the Boycott Brazil "Petition For The United States Senate Committee On The Judiciary To Investigate U.S. Senior Court Judge Robert G. Renner, District of Minnesota, As To His Breach Of Public Trust And Abuse Of Judicial Power." Thank You!

PLEASE VISIT "MINNESOTA LEGAL SHYSTERS." The web site designed to expose transgressions by Minnesota Judges and Lawyers. Web site: Legal Shysters

PLEASE VISIT "BOYCOTT BRAZILIAN ORANGE JUICE." The web site designed to expose the loss of jobs by U.S. orange growers due to Brazilian orange juice. Web site: Boycott Brazi lOJ

PLEASE VISIT "SCHIZOPHRENIA or MIND CONTROL." The web site designed to question doctors who have labeled 2 million Americans with schizophrenia. Web site: False Beliefs

LAMBROS IS PREPARING TO REQUEST "SILICONE ANTIBODY TEST" to prove again he has brain control implants. A one page overview as to companies offering SILICONE ANTIBODY TESTING to detect medical problems resulting from silicone toxicity from brain implants and one page from CABRERA vs. CORDIS CORP., 134 F.3d 1418 (9th Cir. 1998) by Barclays Law Publishers in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD SILICONE ANTIBODY TEST DOCUMENT DATED NOVEMBER 26, 2002 HERE IN PDF.

MAY/JUNE 2002 PRESS RELEASE, entitled "ELECTROMAGNETIC COMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH." Confidential source exposes "PARAMETRIC CAVITIES" as the implants detected in the X-Rays of John Gregory Lambros' SKULL. Please help to distribute this PRESS RELEASE to the global broadcast media. Thank you. Click here for press release..

May 12, 2002
NOTICE TO PERFORM AND/OR ACTUAL NOTICE to Robert G. Renner, U.S. Senior District Court Judge from John G. Lambros, dated March 27, 2002. Why was Judge Rosenbaum assigned the case when Judge Renner had been assigned from 1997 thru February 20, 2001? This letter is 7 pages in total with exhibits and being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD MARCH 27, 2002 LAMBROS' LETTER TO JUDGE RENNER HERE IN PDF.

March 20, 2002, ADDENDUM TO AUGUST 09, 2001, LETTER AND AFFIDAVIT OF LAMBROS TO THE HONORABLE CHARLES E. GRASSLEY AND THE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY." This letter is 3 pages with 29 pages of exhibits being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. (Total of 35 pages)
DOWNLOAD MARCH 20, 2002 LAMBROS' LETTER TO U.S. SENATOR GRASSLEY HERE IN PDF.

2002 PRESS RELEASE (January/February/March) entitled "WITCH-HUNT?" Will U.S. Federal Judge Robert G. Renner go down in history as a modern equivalent of the judges in the Salem witch trials of the 1690s?

United States Senators Grassley, Leahy, Kennedy, Biden, Kohl, Feinstein, Feingold, Schumer, Durbin, Cantwell, Edwards, Hatch, Thurmond, Specter, Kyl, DeWine, Sessions, Brownback, and McConnell of the "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY," investigate United States District Court Judge Robert G. Renner and Lambros' torture and extradition from Brazil.

Motion to Vacate ALL JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS of Judge Robert G. Renner

CANADA has BANNED ALL BRAZILIAN BEEF IN THE CAN. Lambros asked HORMEL FOODS why they distribute Brazilian CORNED BEEF IN THE CAN.

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255 BY A PRISONER IN FEDERAL CUSTOD, denial by the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, and rebuttals.

Go directly to a third-party explanation of
what happened to John Gregory Lambros.

"Tip Box"

 

If you would like to make a donation for the updating, promotion, and legal reserch of the BOYCOTT BRAZIL ORGANIZATION web site, please click the Tip Box for instructions on to make a donation. Thank you.

Support the Boycott Brazil Web Site

Use Google to Search the Boycott Brazil Site

 

Google


Search WWW Search www.lambros.name

FREE TRANSLATION SERVICES OF THIS WEB SITE INTO ANOTHER LANGUAGE

BOYCOTT BRAZIL knows it's a big world out there, and many visitors to this site may need help interpreting the content of this web site. Therefore, I am offering links to FREE TRANSLATION SERVICES online for quick translations of individual words, e-mail messages, or entire web pages. The following free translation services might not pass muster at an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council, but they will help you understand BOYCOTT BRAZIL:

1. Google: allows for translation into 40 languages.CLICK HERE. For automatic translation in instant messaging in 12 languages you must add a translation robot at: http://bot.talk.google.com
2. AltaVista: Translate with Babel Fish, which translates English into eight (8) languages. Visit: www.world.altavista.com
3. FreeTranslation: www.freetranslation.com
4. Systran: www.systransoft.com
5. If you need a dictionary to consult on any of the words used in this site, please go to the best dictionary site on the internet. The site offers dictionariesfor 270 languages: www.yourdictionary.com

Support Boycott Brazil by shopping at Amazon.com!
Click the logo to shop

POST FREE CLASSIFIED ADS, BUSINESS DIRECTORY LISTING AND YELLOW PAGE LISTING FOR YOUR BUSINESS - WITHIN 50 COUNTRIES. SEARCHING FOR A SPECIAL ITEM? SEARCH OVER 35 MILLION CLASSIFIED ADS WITH OVER 500,000 NEW ADS DAILY!!! Visite: www.NoPayClassifieds.com.

For the BEST DEALS on airline bookings, hotels and tours, discounts of up to 80%, privileged bookings during peak periods, last-minute cancellations refunds, the option of paying in your own currency, click on BOYCOTT BRAZIL'S partner, Asiatravelmart.com and check out more than 20,000 wholesale travel products and services reaching over 100 countries worldwide from the world's largest Travel Reservation System on the Internet, while supporting this site.

: www.PetitionOnline.com/jlambros/petition.html

What's Going on Here?
or
How to Find Your Way Around this Web Site.

 

This homepage is an
index. First (immediately
following this blurb),
you will find a direct
link to the Boycott
Brazil list of Mind
Control Resources
on the Internet.
Next, after some
administrative stuff,
you will find a
short background
statement about John
Gregory Lambros, a native
Twin Cities businessman.

Then the rest of this
homepage is an index.
There are twelve major
divisions. Click on the
section title on the
right to go directly
to that part of the index.

At the end, you will find
a snail mail address to
contact John Gregory Lambros
and
WEB RINGS that may be
of interest to you.

Have fun! And come
back often as this site
is updated often.

WHERE TO START: the basics of John Gregory Lambros, a Native of Minnesota.

UNITED STATES SENATOR CHARLES ERNEST GRASSLEY AND THE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY" INVESTIGATE LAMBROS' TORTURE AND EXTRADITION FROM BRAZIL.

BOYCOTT: learn about the boycott of Brazilian products and services due to the torture and electronic mind control of John Gregory Lambros. This section also requests your assistance in establishing
SELECTIVE PURCHASING ORDINANCES
in your town, city, and state.

LEGAL: see some of the legal
documents filed by John Gregory Lambros in
his battle for justice and relief from
continuing torture.

MEDICAL: the basics of the medical
problems faced by John Gregory Lambros.

VICTIMS: find out about other
victims of electronic mind control.

IMPLANTS: the basics of John
Gregory Lambros.

CONTACT YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS TO BOYCOTT BRAZIL: If you would like to email, mail, or phone your elected officials as to the torture and forced implantation to John Gregory Lambros and the Boycott of Brazil, please click here to access THE CONSERVATIVE ACTIVIST'S web site that will assist you in contacting your elected officials. www.conservativeusa.org

PEOPLE AND BUSINESS FINDER: find anyone or any business

CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS - LINE ADS - ADLINKS

INTERNATIONAL EXTRADITION NEWS: News stories as to persons being extradited globally.

COPYRIGHTS: yes, we have that
stuff too.

Links to other victims and web sites
discussing every aspect of electronic mind control.

The URL for this homepage is:
http://www.brazilboycott.org

No fiction writer would dare to use what really happened to an American businessman in Brazil as the story line for a novel. It would certainly be called "not believable" by the critics. But sadly, what is "not believable" as fiction really happened to John Gregory Lambros.

Minnesota stockbroker, investment banker and international businessman John Gregory Lambros was arrested on May 17, 1991, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. He was denied a bail hearing and bail that had been previously approved by the U.S. federal district court judge that authorized his arrest in Brazil. Lambros was denied court appearances required by the Brazilian Constitution, and his family was ripped-off by scamming Rio de Janeiro attorneys: CARLOS ROBERTO SCHLESINGER, NELIO ROBERTO SEIDL MACHADO, RUY LUDOLF RIBEIRO, and VERNON DALE McNAMEE. Lambros was held in degrading conditions in Rio de Janeiro and Brasilia, Brazil, and tortured in Brazilia, Brazil while awaiting extradition to the State of Minnesota.

You say, "That's what happens when you get arrested in a third-world country, right?" Well maybe, but the usual foreign arrest doesn't include the high-tech depaterning (interrogation) that Lambros was subjected to: a form of torture akin to living inside a toaster, bombarded by an intense elector-magnetic field twenty-four hours each day. But when depaterning apparently didn't deliver the results the Brazilians (acting as U.S. agents) wanted (or needed) from Lambros, implants were surgically implanted in Lambros's brain to interrogate, monitor and control him.

To add insult to injury, the Brazilian Supreme Court ILLEGALLY granted Lambros' extradition to the United States on April 30, 1992, knowing Lambros could only receive a MANDATORY LIFE SENTENCE WITHOUT PAROLE. The Brazilian Supreme Court had been advised several times by the United States Embassy in Brasilia, Brazil and by Lambros that the Brazilian Constitution did not allow extradition of persons facing a life sentence. The Brazilian Constitution prohibits any penalty of a lifelong character (Article 5, clause XLVII, b) and Article 75 of the Brazilian Criminal Code, limits the maximum sentence in Brazil to THIRTY (30) YEARS. See, STATE OF WASHINGTON vs. MARTIN SHAW PANG, 940 P.2d 1293, 1352 (Washington, 1997). Lambros COULD NOT legally be extradited, as proven by Mexico's Supreme Court, who blocks the extradition of criminal suspects facing life sentences in the United States. See, "INTERNATIONAL EXTRADITION NEWS" section within this web site for details. In fact, the Brazilian Supreme Court never applied "The Doctrine of Dual Criminality" to Lambros' criminal conduct. 'Double criminality' is in effect a reciprocity REQUIREMENT which is intended to ensure both the U.S. and Brazil that they can rely on CORRESPONDING TREATMENT. In November 1997, Lambros retained the U.S. and Brazilian Lawyers for MARTIN SHAW PANG, who advised Lambros that CONSPIRACY to distribute cocaine is specifically addressed in Brazilian Law No. 6368, Article 14, and carries a sentence of THREE (3) to TEN (10) YEARS. Therefore, the Brazilian Supreme Court by resolution should of at least stated to the United States that Lambros MUST NOT BE SENTENCED TO PRISON FOR MORE THAN THREE (3) to TEN (10) YEARS. CLICK HERE FOR PDF COPY OF DECEMBER 19, 1997 LETTER FROM MARTIN SHAW PANG'S U.S. AND BRAZILIAN ATTORNEY'S TO LAMBROS. (December 19, 1997 letter from Attorney Timothy Dole, Browne & Ressler, Seattle, Wa. and Attorney Dr. Roberto B. Dias da Silva, Escritorio de Advocacia; Rua Marconi, n053 - Coni. 83; Sao Paulo, SP; Brazil to Lambros. This letter offers an excellent overview about statutes of limitation and maximum sentences for drugs within Brazil's Penal Code).

Back in the U.S.A. there was a massive cover-up by the CIA, the Department of Justice, and the State Department, supported by the government and courts of Brazil. Lambros has now sustained years of torture and mind control. He has also been denied the freedom to practice his religion. Lambros remains imprisoned by the federal government, and has been denied the medical treatment he so desperately needs. Lambros' sentence was overturned on September 8, 1995 by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals that vacated his mandatory life sentence without parole because the sentence was not legal under a law in effect at the time of his alleged crime. See U.S. vs. LAMBROS, 65 F.3d 698 (8th Cir. 1995). The sentencing mistake occurred with the consent and assistance of Lambros' court-appointed attorney, CHARLES FAULKNER. Lambros was re-sentenced to thirty-eight (38) years, 30-year sentence with a 8-year term of supervised release, to be served upon release from imprisonment, thus a 38-year term. See, U.S. vs. ROBERTS, 5 F.3d 365, 369 (9th Cir. 1993). PLUS a CONSECUTIVE 5,357 DAY SENTENCE that he WAS NOT EXTRADITED ON, which was a breach of Article 75 of the Brazilian Criminal Code, which limits the maximum prison sentence to thirty (30) years in Brazil and DENIED his request to vacate three (3) other counts as per Brazilian law under the legal terms of Bis in Idem, Mutatis Mutandis, and the Principle of Subsidiarity, that have been granted to other Americans extradited from Brazil. See, STATE OF WASHINGTON vs. MARTIN SHAW PANG, 940 P. 2d 1293 (Wash. 1997) and AFFIRMED by the U. S. Supreme Court, 139 L.Ed.2d 608.

The following facts and proof of this case didn't support Brazil's extradition and treatment of Lambros. - You can't fit a square peg in a round hole. The peg simply won't fit. - When you don't have the law, you pound the facts. And when you don't have the facts you pound the law. If you don't have either, you pound the table. And that's what you've been seeing from Brazil since Lambros was arrested in 1991. But no matter how hard Brazil pounds, the peg still doesn't fit.

: Mr. Lambros offers proof as to the above sentence he received and the laws affecting same by offering the court document written and researched by the oldest and whom most consider the most prestigious law firm in Minnesota, BRIGGS AND MORGAN, P.A., dated August 15, 2000, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, et al, Civil No. 98-1621(DSD/JMM), U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota. The following first four (4) pages of the August 15, 2000, "PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' COMPREHENSIVE MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT" offers an excellent summary overview. You may download the entire 29 page document IN PDF FORMAT BY CLICKING HERE. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

The 1988 new constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil (Republica Federative do Brasil) clearly states within Title II, Fundamental Rights and Guarantees, Chapter I, Individual and Collective Rights and Duties, ARTICLE 5:

Article 5. - All persons are equal before the law, without any distinction whatsoever, and Brazilians and foreigners resident in Brazil are assured of inviolability of the right to life, to liberty, to quality, to security and to property, on the following terms:

III: no one shall be submitted to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment;

IV: the expression of thought is free, and anonymity is forbidden;

V: the right to answer is ensured, in proportion to the offense, besides compensation for property or moral damages or damages to the image;

X: the privacy, private life, honor and image of person are inviolable, and the right to COMPENSATION for property or moral damages resulting from the violation thereof is ensured;

XXXIX: there is no crime without a previous law which defines it, nor is there any punishment without a previous legal imposition;

XL: THE PENAL LAW SHALL NOT BE RETROACTIVE, EXCEPT TO THE BENEFIT OF THE DEFENDANT; (How can the Treaty of Extradition Between the United States of America and the United States of Brazil, signed on January 13, 1961, be legal?)

XLI: the law shall punish any discrimination against fundamental rights and liberties;

XLVII: there shall be NO SENTENCE: b) of life imprisonment; e) which is cruel.

IXXIV: the State shall provide full and gratuitous legal assistance to whoever proves not to have sufficient funds;

LXXV: THE STATE SHALL INDEMNIFY A PERSON CONVICTED BY A JUDICIAL ERROR, AND ALSO A CONVICT WHO REMAINS IMPRISONED LONGER THU THE PERIOD ESTABLISHED IN THE SENTENCE;

LXXVII: Paragraph 2. - The rights and guarantees established in this Constitution DO NOT PRECLUDE others arising out of the regime and the principles adopted by it, or out of INTERNATIONAL TREATIES TO WHICH THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL IS A PARTY.

DOWNLOAD ARTICLE 5 OF THE 1988 CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL HERE IN PDF.

Since Lambros' resentencing in 1997, the following legal events have occurred in brief and contained in total, as funds exist, within this web site:

1. June 1998, Lambros' COMMERCIAL LIEN and Declaratory Judgment/complaint against Attorney Faulkner for malpractice. On February 14, 2001, Judge David S. Doty gave Attorney Faulkner IMMUNITY. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeal upheld Judge Doty's ORDER without even reviewing Lambros' appeal brief on October 17, 2001.

2. June 13, 2000, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ORDERED Lambros to serve a consecutive 5,357 day sentence that he was not extradited on from Brazil.

3. April 13, 2001, MOTION TO VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS AND ORDER BY JUDGE ROBERT G. RENNER PURSUANT TO RULE 60(b)(6) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR VIOLATIONS OF TITLE 28 USCA 455. On March 08, 2002, Judge David S. Doty dismissed Lambros' motion stating he did not have JURISDICTION. On April 10, 2002, Lambros filed a NOTICE OF APPEAL and MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.

4. August 09, 2001, Lambros requested U.S. Senator Charles Ernest Grassley and the "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY" to investigate his torture and illegal extradition from Brazil.

5. February 15, 2002, Lambros' complaint to the MINNESOTA OFFICE OF LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY as to the actions of Minnesota Attorneys PETER J. THOMPSON, JOSEPH T. WALBRAN, and ROBERT G. RENNER in 1976, that carries forward to this point in time. On April 12, 2002 Lambros' complaint was denied as to Attorneys THOMPSON and WALBRAN. On April 20, 2002, Lambros appealed the April 12, 2002 ORDER.

Lambros believes the current investigation by U.S. Senator Charles Ernest Grassley and the "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY" will expose and verify all facts contained within this web site. Thanking you in advance for reviewing and supporting the BOYCOTT BRAZIL web site.

 

PLEASE NOTE: "Guimaraes, 58, faces NO MORE
THAN 30 YEARS IN PRISON - THE MAXIMUM JAIL
SENTENCE ALLOWED UNDER BRAZIL LAW.
" [Article
75 of the Brazilian Criminal Code]

WHY WAS JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS GIVEN A MANDATORY
LIFE SENTENCE WITHOUT PAROLE WHEN BRAZILIAN LAW
DOESN'T ALLOW SAME???

The following letter from MARTIN SHAW PANG'S lawyers in the U.S. and Brazil to Lambros proves that the MAXIMUM SENTENCE FOR CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE COCAINE in Brazil carries a sentence of THREE (3) to TEN (10) YEARS. Therefore, the Brazilian Supreme Court should of specified that Lambros must not be sentenced to prison for more than TEN (10) YEARS. The U.S. District Court did not follow "The Doctrine of Dual Criminality" either. It appears Lambros, attorneys in Brazil must of obtained there law license within a Cracker Jacks box.

Click here to view STATE OF WASHINGTON vs. MARTIN SHAW PANG, 940 P.2d 1293 (Wash. 1997) opinion which proves Lambros was not given any type of law in Brazil. This opinion was affirmed by the Supreme Court.

TREATIES DO NOT SUPERSEDE THE CONSTITUTION: By the Constitution of the United States a treaty is made of like obligation as an act of legislation; both are declared to be the supreme law of the land; and NO SUPERIOR EFFICACY IS GIVEN TO EITHER OVER THE OTHER. See, WHITNEY vs. ROBERTSON, 124 US 190, 8 S Ct 456, 31 L Ed. 386 (1888). A treaty CANNOT change the CONSTITUTION or be held valid if in violation thereof. See, BOUDINOT vs. UNITED STATES (The Cherokee Tobacco) 11 Wall 616, 20 L. Ed. 227 and THOMAS vs. GAY, 169 US 264, 18 S. Ct. 340, 42 L. Ed. 740 (1898). When a treaty is inconsistent with a subsequent act of Congress the latter will prevail. See, RAINEY vs. U.S., 232 US 310, 34 S. Ct. 429, 58 L. Ed. 617 (1914). An act of Congress prevails over an earlier treaty so far as they cannot be reasonably harmonized, although an intent to abrogate a treaty will not be lightly attributed to Congress. See, U.S. vs. PAYNE, 264 US 446, 44 S. Ct. 352, 68 L. Ed. 782 (1924). Where the provisions of a treaty and a subsequent act of Congress ARE IN CONFLICT, the Act of Congress WILL CONTROL IN THE COURTS of the United States as the later expression of the municipal law of the United States. See, PIGEON RIVER IMPROV. S. & BOOM CO. vs. CHARLES W. COX, 291 US 138, 54 S. Ct. 361, 78 L. Ed. 695 (1934). Under the Constitution, the treaty power CANNOT OVERRIDE CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS RESPECTING INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, REID vs. COVERT, 354 US 1, 16-17, 77 S.Ct. 1222 1230, 1 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1957). See, ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK vs. STATE OF N.Y., 860 F.2d 1145, 1163 (2nd Cir. 1988). PLEASE NOTE: The Treaty of Extradition Between the United States of America and the UNITED STATES OF BRAZIL was signed on January 13, 1961, entered into force on December 17, 1964, 15 U.S.T. 2093; T.I.A.S. No. 5691; Additional Protocol to Treaty, signed on June 18, 1962, entered into force on December 17, 1964, 15 U.S.T. 2112; T.I.A.S. No. 5691. See, STATE OF WASHINGTON vs. MARTIN SHAW PANG, 940 P.2d 1293, 1330 fn. 22, 1334, and 1354 fn. 1 (Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc 1997), cert. denied, 139 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997). In 1964 military leaders of Brazil took control of the Brazilian Government and Brazil's government was returned to civilian rule in 1985. In 1986, Brazilians elected a new Congress and new state legislatures and governors in the FIRST nationwide general election after military rule ended. See, WORLD BOOK ENCYCLOPEDIA, (2002), Volume 2, page 586. The 1988 NEW CONSTITUTION OF BRAZIL abolished the president's former power to rule by decree. Legislative power is exercised by the National Congress (Congresso Nacional), which consists of a 487-member Chamber of Deputies (Camara dos Deputados) and a 72-member Senate (Senado). The 1988 NEW CONSTITUTION OF BRAZIL provided for direct elections every five years to the country's most powerful political position, the presidency. Brazil's judiciary is headed by a FEDERAL SUPREME COURT, whose 11 members ARE APPOINTED BY THE PRESIDENT WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE SENATE. See, THE NEW ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA, (1993)(Micropaedia), Vol. 2, page 488. Both ENCYCLOPEDIA'S state that Brazil's OFFICIAL NAME IS: REPUBLICA FEDERATIVO do BRASIL (Federative Republic of Brazil). WHY DOES THE TREATY USE THE NAME "UNITED STATES OF BRAZIL"???? It is clear that the 1988 NEW CONSTITUTION OF BRAZIL reaffirmed Article 5, clause XLVII(b), that there will be no life sentence in Brazil and the legal norm consolidated by Article 75 of the Brazilian Criminal Code, which limits the maximum prison sentence to thirty (30) years. See, STATE vs. PANG, 940 P.2d 1293, 1345 and 1352 (This Article limits the prison sentence time, conforming exactly with the present constitutional dictamen, as it was the case with the Constitutions [Brazil] of 1937 (Article 122, 13), 1946 (Article 41 Par. 31 and 1969 Article 153 Par. 1) which prohibited life sentences. Now, if that is the case, how can we give up a constitutional precept in face of a request for the extradition of an individual who one way or another, subjects himself to Brazilian Laws?) Id. at 1345-1346. LAMBROS COULD NOT BE EXTRADITED TO THE UNITED STATES LEGALLY.

DOING BUSINESS IN BRAZIL, by Brazilian Attorney PINHEIRO NETO, (1991) offers an excellent overview into THE BRAZILIAN LEGAL SYSTEM. Attorney PINHEIRO NETO'S book is in english and published by Matthew Bender & Company. Of interest are the following: (1) "In the field of CRIMINAL LAW, the principle IN DUBIO PRO REO (i.e. any doubt shall be resolved in favor of the defendant) has been fully recognized and applied by the courts. See, 1.133; (2) "In the international sphere, the Code of Civil Procedure provides that the Brazilian Courts have jurisdiction when: (i) the defendant, WHATEVER HIS NATIONALITY, IS DOMICILED IN BRAZIL; ..." See, 1.140; (3) "Finally, the Code provides that an action brought before a foreign court does not prevent the Brazilian Courts from hearing the same action and any others connected with it." See, 1.141; (3) "The Federal Constitution enacted on Oct. 5, 1988 has created the Superior Court of Justice, which is, in fact, a third level of ordinary jurisdiction. On April 7, 1989, the Superior Court of Justice was inaugurated and began its activities, as established in Law No. 7746 of March 30, 1989. The Superior Court of Justice will, inter alia, judge at the special appeal level decisions that (i) CONTRAVENE A TREATY OR FEDERAL LAW, OR DENY THE EFFECTIVENESS THEREOF; ...." See, 1.145 (4) "The lower jurisdiction is exercised by the STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS, by the puisne judges who have competence to hear CASES AT FIRST INSTANCE. See, 1.147 IN 1991, JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS WAS NEVER SEEN BY A JUDGE WITHIN A STATE OR FEDERAL COURT IN Rio DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL WHEN HE WAS ARRESTED AND ILLEGALLY TAKEN TO BRASILIA, BRAZIL TO BE TORTURED AND SEEN BY THE BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT. WHY WAS THE SUPREME COURT THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE???????

Here is the July 17, 1992 (07/17/92) RADIOLOGICAL CONSULTATION REQUEST/REPORT of John Gregory Lambros by the U.S. Bureau Prisons Medical Center, Rochester, Minnesota, which states, "In the lateral views there appear to be clusters of punctate radiopaque foreign bodies...."

HERE IS THE JULY 17, 1992 (07/17/92) x-ray of John Gregory Lambros by the U.S. Bureau of Prisons Medical Center, Rochester, Minnesota, that shows the clusters of PUNCTATE RADIOPAQUE FOREIGN BODIES. BRAIN CONTROL IMPLANTS.

CLICK HERE to download this x-ray in PDF. YOU MUST HAVE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THE X-RAY. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD X-RAY IN PDF

February 24, 1995 letter from Glen E. Nichols to Attorney Jeffrey L. Orren as to Mr. Nichols review of John G. Lambros' X-rays dated 07-17-92, and the other dated 07-27-92. Mr. Nichols states, "However, I saw two sets of 'clusters of punctate radiopaque foreign bodies.' They were in two separate clusters; one approximately two (2) inches above and slightly forward from the ear canal, in the area known as the AUDITORY AREA of the temporal lobe cerebral cortex; a second cluster approximately one (1) inch frontal to the above cluster in the area known as the SPEECH AREA or BROCA'S AREA of the frontal lobe cerebral cortex. I used a magnification lens, and there appear to be approximately 10 to 15 radiopaque objects within each cluster, each object is about 1 millimeter (.039), or less, in diameter. The objects are clustered in two separate groups and within a diameter for each group of approximately 1 centimeter (.39 inch). I viewed the 07-17-92 X-ray of John G. Lambros with a Christian minister familiar with X-ray material. He also saw several identifiable radiopaque bodies in the two separate clusters in the X-ray." This letter is a total of two (2) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 24, 1995, GLEN E. NICHOLS' LETTER TO ATTORNEY ORREN HERE IN PDF.

December 20, 2001, letter from LAMBROS to Glen E. Nichols, regarding the release of the NICHOLS February 24, 1995 letter. This letter is a total of two (2) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SITE BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD DECEMBER 20, 2001 LAMBROS LETTER TO GLEN E. NICHOLS HERE IN PDF.

April 12, 2002, letter from LAMBROS to Glen E. Nichols, as to his FINAL NOTICE to Lambros to remove all letters and documents related to Nichols from the Boycott Brazil web site. Please note that Lambros requests Nichols to have the Central District of California, U.S. Attorneys Office to prosecute Lambros for violations of Title 18, USCA 1001, as to Lambros' willful filing of false statements as to the X-rays of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons. WHY DOESN'T ANYONE WANT TO PROSECUTE OR FILE CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST LAMBROS FOR ANYTHING WITHIN HIS BOYCOTT BRAZIL WEB SITE?? COULD IT POSSIBLY BE THAT ALL FACTS AND LAW ARE TRUE??? This letter and exhibit is a total of two (2) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD APRIL 12, 2002 LAMBROS LETTER TO GLEN E. NICHOLS HERE IN PDF.

In 1995, Author Alex Constantine stated within his book PSYCHIC DICTATORSHIP IN THE U.S.A., "Is it possible, asks John Lambros, a prisoner at Leavenworth and mind control experimentee (a claim he corroborates with an X-ray of four strand-shaped foreign objects in his head) that the particle beam intended for enemy missiles alone might now be intended for human minds?" See, Page 43. 1 would strongly suggest reading Mr. Constantine's book, as it offers an excellent overview on mind control technology, "Masers, not lasers, are the hidden thrust of "Star Wars." The weapon is an extremely sophisticated mind and body machine capable of thought transfer, manipulation of emotions and muscle control. Images, even dreams, can be beamed to the subject. A human or cybernetic controller can carry on a conversation telepathically, and at the same time instill physical sensations, subliminal commands, emotions and visual and aural hallucinations. Computerized EM devices that talk and transmit images to the brain were current when Reagan delivered his first SDI pitch in 1983 . . . . The Microwave Mafia often rely on the implantation of miniaturized radio receivers. The technique known as intracerebral control and uses radio or ultra-sound. It was developed by the CIA's MKDRACO and HATTER brain telemetry projects. The implantation of a micro-receiver in the frontal or temporal lobes by trained teams of operatives is done with an encaphalator,' usually through the sinuses of a drugged subject. But the current state of art in Radio-Hypnotic Intracerebral Control (RHIC) depends upon 'Personal Radio and Electromagnetic Frequency Allocation,' or PREMA a frequency unique to the subject's brain. A 'READING WAND' is hidden near the victim, who is scanned by an instrument smaller than a briefcase. Once the 'Freak' is determined,. the brain becomes a link in a cybernetic system, and the subject (or a group" can communicate, be surveilled, guided, manipulated, harassed or controlled from afar." See, Pages 43 and 44.

If you would like to review the court ordered January 19, 1994, COMPETENCY EVALUATION OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS, which was conducted by Dr. Kenneth J. Criqui, a holder of multiple Ph.D.'s, please click here. Please note that Dr. Criqui stated within his January 19, 1994, "ADDENDUM TO COMPETENCY EVALUATION JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS," on Page 2, "The government could not have done a better job of instilling fear and paranoia in Mr. Lambros had they hired a psychiatrist to plan this out. First Mr. Lambros was sent to FMC Rochester. The FIRST X-RAY SHOWED SOMETHING, AND WHILE THE SECOND SHOWED NOTHING, IT IS PLAIN AND EVIDENT THAT THE SECOND X-RAY WAS TAKEN AT A DIFFERENT INTENSITY SETTING AND IS THEREFORE QUITE INVALID TO C014PARE TO THE FIRST. HOW BETTER TO MAKE THE SUBJECT THINK THAT THE GOVERNMENT IS JUST INVOLVED IN "ANOTHER ONE OF ITS COVER-UPS'?."

UNITED STATES SENATOR CHARLES ERNEST GRASSLEY AND THE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY" INVESTIGATE JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS' TORTURE AND EXTRADITION FROM BRAZIL.

THE UNITED STATES SENATE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY" HAS JURISDICTION ON ALL UNITED STATES FEDERAL COURTS AND JUDGES. U.S. SENATOR CHARLES ERNEST GRASSLEY SITS ON THE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY."

1. On August 09, 2001 JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS mailed a two (2) page letter and eighty-one (81) page AFFIDAVIT (including exhibits) to United States Senator Charles Ernest Grassley for his review, investigation and presentment to the United States Senate "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY." The documents were received by Senator Grassley's office on August 14, 2001. You may download the following documents in PDF FORMAT: a) copy of the U.S. Postal Service Return Receipt confirming U.S. Senator Grassley's receipt of LAMBROS' letter and affidavit on August 14, 2001. This document is one (1) page; b) LAMBROS' August 09, 2001 letter to Senator Grassley. This document is two (2) pages; c) LAMBROS' August 09, 2001, AFFIDAVIT to the United States Senate "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY."

This document is eighty-one (81) pages with exhibits. Please note that LAMBROS has numbered each page of the AFFIDAVIT in long-hand in the lower right hand corner of each page, 1 thru 81, to ensure readers that pages and exhibits don't get mixed-up. CLICK BELOW to view these pages in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD AUGUST 09, 2001, LETTER AND AFFIDAVIT TO U.S. SENATOR CHARLES E. GRASSLEY HERE IN PDF.

The following is a copy of the FIRST PAGE OF LAMBROS' AUGUST 09, 2001 AFFIDAVIT TO THE UNITED STATES SENATE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY." Please note the names of those within the coverup.

JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS,
Petitioner,

vs.

ROBERT G. RENNER, U.S. District Court Judge for the District of Minnesota and formerly U.S. Attorney for Minnesota from 1969 to 1977; JOSEPH T. WALBRAN, Assistant U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota in 1976; GLENN BASKFIELD, U.S. Parole/Probation Officer in the District of Minnesota in 1976; PETER THOMPSON, Private Attorney that represented John G. Lambros in 1976 thru 1979; EDWARD J. DEVITT, U.S. District Court Judge for the District of Minnesota in 1976; THOMAS B. HEFFELFINGER, U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota in 1992; DOUGLAS R. PETERSON, Assistant U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota in 1992; AUDREY CARLSON, Employee in the Office of the U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota on December 17, 1992; CHARLES W. FAULKNER, Private Attorney that represented John G. Lambros in 1992 thru 1994; JAMES L. PROPOTNICK, Deputy U.S. Marshall for the District of Minnesota in 1976; DONALD E. NELSON, Special Agent of the Federal Drug Enforcement Administration in 1976 within the District of Minnesota; JAMES P. BRASETH, Special Agent of the Federal Drug Enforcement Administration in 1976 within the District of Minnesota; LEON A. CHENEY, Deputy U.S. Marshall for the District of Minnesota in 1976; JOHN DOES, #1 thru 30; JANE DOES, #1 thru 30;,

Defendants.

AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN GREGORY
LAMBROS
, Reg. No. 00436-124,
United States Penitentiary
Leavenworth, P.O. Box 1000,
Leavenworth, Kansas 66048-1000 USA
Web site: www.brazilboycott.org

IN RE: Criminal Indictments and Judgment from the United States District Court, District of Minnesota, U.S.A. vs. JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS,:
1. CR-3-75-128;
2. CR-3-76-17;
3. CR-3-76-54;
4. CR-4-89-82(5).

This Affidavit is dated:
August 09, 2001

STATE OF KANSAS

COUNTY OF LEAVENWORTH

SS: AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS

2. March 20, 2002, ADDENDUM TO AUGUST 09, 2001, LETTER AND AFFIDAVIT OF LAMBROS TO THE HONORABLE CHARLES E. GRASSLEY AND THE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY." This letter is 3 pages with 29 pages of exhibits being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. (Total of 35 pages)

DOWNLOAD MARCH 20, 2002 LAMBROS' LETTER To U.S. SENATOR GRASSLEY HERE IN PDF.

3. September 20, 2002, SECOND ADDENDUM TO AUGUST 09, 2001, LETTER AND AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS TO THE HONORABLE CHARLES E. GRASSLEY AND THE "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY." This letter is 3 pages with 5 pages of exhibits, total 8 pages, being offered in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD SEPTEMBER 20, 2002 LAMBROS' LETTER TO U.S. SENATOR GRASSLEY HERE IN PDF.

4. November 25, 2002, letter from Lambros to CHADWICK GROOVER, a staff member of Senator Charles E. Grassley and the "COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY." This letter was written at the request of CHADWICK GROOVER as per his conversation with the Lambros family. This letter is two (2) pages in length with eight (8) pages of exhibits, total of 10 pages, being offered in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 25, 2002 LAMBROS' LETTER TO CHADWICK GROOVER HERE IN PDF.

 


Return to top of index

CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS

Support Boycott Brazil by shopping at Amazon.com!
Click the logo to shop

In Association with Amazon.com

POST FREE CLASSIFIED ADS, BUSINESS DIRECTORY LISTING AND YELLOW PAGE LISTING FOR YOUR BUSINESS - WITHIN 50 COUNTRIES. SEARCHING FOR A SPECIAL ITEM? SEARCH OVER 35 MILLION CLASSIFIED ADS WITH OVER 500,000 NEW ADS DAILY!!! Visite: www.NoPayClassifieds.com.

PLEASE VISIT the FACEBOOK listing for Boycott Brazil at: http://tinyurl.com/boycottbrazil

PLEASE VISIT the FACEBOOK listing for NoPayClassifieds.com at: http://tinyurl.com/NoPayClassifieds

No Pay Classifieds - Boycott Brazil has launched a FREE classified advertising site in August 2007, within 50 global markets, an experiment the company says could lead to new sources of support and revenue. The FREE classified ads and want ads allow for the display of one (1) color photo and a maximum of 150 words to describe the item(s) or service. "We are the think globally, act locally, FREE classified ad and want ad community," said John Gregory Lambros, President and Founder. Our mission is very simple, "free help to billions of people in locating jobs, housing, and just about anything else within their neighborhood or over one million neighborhoods throughout the world - all for FREE." Please help us spread the word by telling a friend and placing a free ad within No Pay Classifieds. It will take all of five minutes. THANK YOU!!!! PLEASE VISIT: www.NoPayClassifieds.com

PLEASE VISIT FreeRetiredStuff.com The May 2006 web site designed by Boycott Brazil to globally divert landfill waste for reuse, by identifying usable items and those who will receive them. Web site: www.FreeRetiredStuff.com

PLEASE VISIT "BRAZIL LEGAL SHYSTERS." The web site designed to expose transgressions by Brazilian Judges and Lawyers. Web site: BrazilShysters.BoycottBrazil.com

PLEASE VISIT "BRAZIL LIEN ACCOUNT." The web site designed to expose the $500 BILLION COMMERCIAL LIEN (U.S.) DEFAULTED BY FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL and Others by Operation of Law. Web site: BrazilLien.BoycottBrazil.com

PLEASE VISIT "BOYCOTT SOYBEANS FROM BRAZIL." The website idesigned to expose Brazil's attempt to kill the United States soybean industry by "DUMPING" and "FLOODING" the United States with cheaply produced soybeans. Web site: BrazilSoybeans.BoycottBrazil.com

PLEASE VISIT "LEGAL NOTICE OF FRAUD AND DECEIT BY ATTORNEY COLIA F. CEISEL." The web site designed to expose Minnesota Attorney Colia F. Ceisel for placing John Gregory Lambros in prison for 25 years while supposedly defending him. Web site: FraudByCeisel.BoycottBrazil.com

PLEASE VISIT "MINNESOTA LEGAL SHYSTERS." The web site designed to expose transgressions by Minnesota Judges and Lawyers. Web site: LegalShysters.BoycottBrazil.com

PLEASE VISIT "BOYCOTT BRAZILIAN ORANGE JUICE." The web site designed to expose the loss of jobs by U.S. orange growers due to Brazilian orange juice. Web site: BoycottBrazilOJ.BoycottBrazil.com

PLEASE VISIT "SCHIZOPHRENIA or MIND CONTROL." The web site designed to question doctors who have labeled 2 million Americans with schizophrenia. Web site: FalseBeliefs.BoycottBrazil.com

NATIONAL LEGAL PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATES - Providing technical consulting assistance to the legal profession in Pre-Sentencing, Post-Conviction Relief, Parole Analysis, and INTERNATIONAL EXTRADITION. Offices in the United States and London, England. Web site: www.NLPA.com

FREE AMERICAN NEWSMAGAZINE - The Free American is committed to bringing the truth to the American People with an editorial policy that is unabashedly, pro-American. Web site: www.freeamerican.com

PRISON LEGAL NEWS - www.prisonlegalnews.org

FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS FOUNDATION - www.famm.org

2600 MAGAZINE - Excellent articles from the hacker perspective, that is, written with a sense of "what happens if you do this instead of what everyone else on the planet does" and not from the perspective of what you SHOULD do or else. Web site: www.2600.com

MOTHER JONES MAGAZINE - A magazine for people who think freely and care deeply, with a focus on values of social justice, fairness, and community. Journalism that is fearless, accurate, thought provoking, and free of commercial pressures and political cant. Web site: www.motherjones.com

infoUSA Inc. - Database on people, businesses and businesses credit reports. Web site: www.infoUSA.com

DEMOCRACY NOW - The resistance radio program from the Pacifica Foundation. Web site: www.democracynow.org
GREENPEACE - Why surf when you can make waves? Web site: www.greenpeace.org
AIG - The insurance company JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS wished he had been covered by when he visited BRAZIL for the business opportunity that has cost him his life. AIG does things others can't with WORLDRISK coverage. AIG's insurance coverage insures you against KIDNAPPING, RANSOM, and EXTORTION, and provides for emergency medical assistance. AIG's greatest strength lies in the ability to grasp the intricacies of a foreign culture and NEGOTIATE FOREIGN LAW. Web site: www.AIG.com
LOBSTER - The LOBSTER newsletter by Robin Ramsay is published twice a year, June and December, offering an overview on the British security and intelligence services. It also has tracked global mind control programs and the nightmares attached to same. To order a copy of the LOBSTER, email: robin@lobster.karoo.co.uk
DRUG REFORM COORDINATION NETWORK - DRCNet offers purely educational articles as to the global legalization of drugs. Web site: www.drcnet.org
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL - Could spam be the new weapon against human rights abuses? Amnesty International's Fast Action Stops Torture network aims to hit despots where it hurts - in their in-boxes. FAST alerts arrive by email, pager, cell phone, or PDA whenever a political prisoner is believed to be in imminent danger; you log in at www.amnestyusa.org/fast and fire off a prewritten letter. The site provides background on each case, plus the option to alter the letter's language if you wish. Currently a network of more than 80,000 volunteers are part of the Urgent Action Network, which began in 1972. Web site: www.amnestyusa.org/fast
WRITE BEHIND BARS - Write a friend! Web site: www.writebehindbars.com
CellPals - Specializes in web development for prisoners, by offering services such as personal homepages, displays of prisoner artwork and poetry, and penpal ads. Web site: www.cellpals.com

NEXUS MAGAZINE - Excellent magazine from Australia that reports on Mind Control. Web site: www.nexusmagazine.com

COUNTRYSIDE. Web site: www.countrysidemag.com

MEDIA BYPASS. The magazine who's mission is to educate Americans with regard to their unalienable rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and to publish relevant news withheld by the mainstream media. Web site: www.4bypass.com

RESURRECTION CONSTITUTIONAL NEWSLETTER AND FAX NETWORK - When you want to hear the other side of the story by the people who were there, you need to subscribe to the Resurrection Newsletter and the Resurrection Fax Back System for immediate information on stories glossed over by the media and insight into the spin. The monthly newsletter is 20 to 40 plus pages. Sample issue of the latest edition is $5.00. Contact Editor Sheila M. Reynolds, P.O. Box 601, Cornville, Arizona 86325. E-Mail: rnfn@mtcarmel.everyl.net

AERIE ART GALLERY -The internet art gallery that offers a great selectionof oil paintings and pencil drawing prints on paper or canvas. Web site: www.aerieartgallery.com

"THIS BANK ROBBER'S LIFE" is a book that tells the story of one of the most notorious--not to mention, one of the most colorful-outlaws of our generation. Patrick "Paddy" Mitchell has been featured on the TV shows: America's Most Wanted, Unsolved Mysteries, Street Stories With Ed Braldley, Amazing Capers, A&E Biographies, Dateline NBC .... You've read about him in numerous newspapers and magazines, two full length books, and the Hollywood movie, "Point Break" was based on a short interval of his life. (He is the character portrayed by Patrick Swayze in the movie. And "No" he did not perish riding that monstrous wave in Australia; he lived to tell the story!) The book is available only on the web at: www.paddymitchell.com.

Note: Paddy Mitchell is a strong advocate of John Lambros in his quest to BOYCOTT BRAZIL!

Return to top of index

: www.PetitionOnline.com/jlambros/petition.html

FOR DOCUMENTATION START READING

Congress Asleep at the Switch Again, The Phoenix Letter, Antony C. Sutton, August, 1995. The lead article in this issue details the gruesome assault, torture, and forced implantation of U.S. citizen and businessman John Gregory Lambros.
Gate Keepers for Corruption, The Phoenix Letter, Editor Antony C. Sutton, October 1995. A second article by the Phoenix Letter that presents uncovered State Department documents as to the cover-up by Brazilian and U.S. Officials as to torture and denial of due process to John Gregory Lambros.
JOHN G. LAMBROS' OPEN LETTER RESPONSE TO DR. SUTTON'S LETTER RECEIVED ON APRIL 17, 2000. (3 pages in length)

APPENDIX I. Covert Operations of the U.S. National Security Agency. John St. Clair Akwei vs. National Security Agency, Fort George G. Meade, MD., USA (Civil Action #92-0449). Evidence from the lawsuit filed at the U.S. Courthouse in Washington, D.C. as to the NSA's structure, national security activities, proprietary technologies and covert operations to monitor individual persons globally. This lawsuit brief was printed in its entirety in NEXUS MAGAZINE, April-May 1996. The attached information was taken from APPENDIX 1, of TEXE MARRS book PROJECT L.U.C.I.D. Texe Marrs is a retired career U.S. Air Force Officer that commanded communications-electronics and engineering units around the globe. Texe Marrs states on page 97, "My own pioneering work in this field dates from the mid-1970s, when I first began my in-depth research into the complex, and fascinating, subject of MIND CONTROL THROUGH IMPLANTED, COMPUTER DEVICES IN HUMAN BEINGS." Also, on page 98 and 99, "Even as I wrote MEGA FORCES, I was becoming aware of super-secret experiments by government and corporate laboratories in which HUMAN SUBJECTS - usually unwilling and unsuspecting GUINEA PIGS - WERE HAVING COMPUTER CHIPS AND TRANSMITTING DEVICES IMPLANTED INTO THEIR CEREBRAL HEMISPHERES (e.g. their brains), auditory (ear) organ, and elsewhere in their bodies." Marrs offers further evidence on page 104 of PROJECT L.U.C.I.D. by stating, "GLENN KRAWCZYK, for example, in an article in NEXUS MAGAZINE [February/March 1993, pp. 41-46] entitled, "MIND CONTROL AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER," provides documented evidence of MIND CONTROL, biomedical devices implanted in human beings. He also presents a detailed bibliography of source references."
Press Release: A Blanket of Silence, April, 1996
Boycott of Brazilian coffee due to the torture of American citizen John Gregory Lambros. A letter from Lambros to the Chief Executive Officer of Wal-Mart Stores
Anyone Out There Have Implants?
April 13, 1996 memo listing Lambros' educational background
CYBERGODS MANUSCRIPT, is a 1996 release by Lennart Lindqvist, Evamarie Taylor, and Robert Naeslund of Gruppen, Box 136, 114-79, Stockholm, Sweden. The 28 page manuscript is a tiny part of a significantly more extensive research report and material within the Computer-Brain Report that offers studies and x-ray evidence of humans implanted with radio-transmitters in their heads and brains illegally by police in various countries globally. John Gregory Lambros' family attorney mailed Gruppen his U.S. Bureau of Prisons x-ray that were authenticated by doctors in Sweden as to implants in the right side of Lambros' head, behind his ear. The Swedish doctors report stated, "There appear to be clusters of punctate radiopaque foreign bodies . . . These objects have absolutely no natural origin and are most probably some kind of TRANSMITTERS . . . Moreover, in the frontal lobes, there are large dark spots which have been caused by oxygen deficiency. Reduced oxygen balance is a normal consequence of radiowaves penetration of biological tissue through the heat-energy and dehydrating effects of the electro-magnetic energies. Oxygen deficiency can also cause a change in physiological conditions and has a detrimental effect on health." Lambros' x-ray appears on page 9 of CYBERGODS. This document is 28 pages in length and will take a varying amount of time to download depending on your connection. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT CYBERGODS. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD THE DOCUMENT IN PDF
MICROWAVES AND MIND CONTROL, by Dr. Rosalie Bertell, which appeared within the Summer 2000, LOBSTER 39. The article offers excellent reference web sites. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT MICROWAVES AND MIND CONTROL. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD THE DOCUMENT IN PDF
"PLAYING THOSE MIND GAMES," Chapter 53 from THE SIXTY GREATEST CONSPIRACIES OF ALL TIME, by Jonathan Vankin and John Whalen. A Citadel Press Book Published by Carol Publishing Group. This chapter, pages 401 thru 406 offers excellent background information on the U.S. Government funding the STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE ESP project, Dr. Jose Delgado developed "a small three-channel stimulator which can be placed subcutaneously . . . The instrument is solid state, has no batteries and can work indefinitely." In other words, a BRAIN IMPLANT, and the UFO abduction scenario perfect cover-up for government mind control implant programs. This document is six (6) pages in length. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD THE DOCUMENT IN PDF

INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE ON OFFENSIVE MICROWAVE WEAPONS, Managing Director, Harlan Girard. Attached for your review is the May 31, 2000 letter from Harlan Girard to LAMBROS and Lambros' June 7, 2000 letter in response to same. Mr. Girard is allegedly an expert in the area of brain-control implants but has done NOTHING to assist Lambros since 1996 when he first contacted Lambros offering information as to global government use of brain-control implantation. The two letters and copy of the envelope are three (3) pages in length. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD HARLAN GIRARD DOCUMENT IN PDF HERE.

THREE (3) TYPES OF PROCURED METHODS OF MIND CONTROL at its highest performance utilization are as follows: 1. E.D.O.M. (Electronic Dissolution of Memory); 2. E.E.O.M. (Electronic Enhancement of Memory); 3. R.H.I.C. (Radio Hypnotic Intra-Cerebal Control). RHIC techniques call for the implantation of a microsized radio receiver .... The procedure involves the insertion of the micro-receiver or transceiver (allows 2-way communications) into the desired areas such as the frontal lobe or temporal lobe (as in brain) of the subject in question. This information is contained within the article entitled "SECRET WEAPONS AGAINST TERROR" Is the Military Quietly Deploying More Exotic Tools of Warfare? by John Kettler, which appeared in the January/February 2002, ATLANTIS RISING. The article documents the writing of Dr. Andrija Puharich, Dr. Rauni Leena Kilde (the former Chief Medical Officer of Finland, Norio Hayakawa, and Lt. Col. Tom Bearden. This article is four (4) PDF PAGES. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD ATLANTIS RISING JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2002 ARTICLE IN PDF HERE.

The following diagrams offer a sketch of the "FIELD CHAIR" and "FIELD CUBE" that are used for DEPATTERNING - DEMAGNETIZING A HUMAN. The supporter of John G. Lambros that offers the sketches does not want to be identified at this time. The sketches are offered in PDF. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO DOWNLOAD. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD DIAGRAMS OF "FIELD CHAIR AND "FIELD CUBE" IN PDF HERE.

JOHN FLEMING offers background information on the more than 200 working surveillance satellites used by governments around the world, "Black Bag" technology, within his article entitled "The Shocking Menace of satellite surveillance." The article was written for Pravda.Ru. Of special interest is the fact that lead-shielding may allow you to escape monitoring by a satellite. John Fleming is a writer and author of a book, "The War of all Against All." The 4 page article is offered in PDF. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO DOWNLOAD. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD JOHN FLEMING ARTICLE IN PDF HERE.

"BRANDED BY THE SECURITY POLICE", by Robert Naeslund of GRUPPEN, Box 136, 114-79, Stockholm, Sweden, Fax 08-668-60-66. This is a fourteen (14) page document written by Robert Naeslund as to his forced violent sedating by Swedish Security Police (SAPO), at which time they placed THREE (3) IMPLANTED RADIOTRANSMITTERS WITHIN HIS SKULL (frontal lobe). Mr. Naeslund offers x-rays of the radio-transmitters and verification of the radio-transmitters, R.H.I.C. AND E.D.O.M. - - Radio-Hypnotic Intracerebal Control and Electronic Dissolution of Memory, by United States Medical Doctors. The following PDF download may not offer clear pictures of the x-rays offered within BRANDED BY THE SECURITY POLICE, thus I suggest you contract Gruppen at the above address for first generation copy. Please support Robert Naeslund. Thank you. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD "BRANDED BY THE SECURITY POLICE" DOCUMENT IN PDF HERE.

NAPA SENTINEL articles by Harry V. Martin and David Caul, Series 10, November 5, 1991, "SOVIETS, U.S. BOTH USING MIND CONTROL METHODS"; Series 11, November 8, 1991, (continuation of Series 10); and Series 12, November 19, 1991, "MIND CONTROL ORIGINS FOUND IN NAZI GERMANY." The articles offer an EXCELLENT OVERVIEW OF MIND CONTROL. The scientists who pioneered the work were Dr. Jose Delgado, Dr. W. Ross Adey and Dr. Wilder Penfield with the guidance of Dr. Ivor Browning. Radio receiver-amplifer(s) where wired into the hypothalamus of the brain of animals and humans. The CIA utilized the technique for getting trained pigeons to fly miniature transmitters to the ledge of KGB safe houses where the devices monitored conversations for months. Dr. Elizabeth Rauscher, director of Technic Research Laboratory stated, "Give me the money and three months," she says, "and I'll be able to affect the behavior of eighty percent (80%) of the people in this town without their knowing it." According to Lincoln Lawrence, author of WERE WE CONTROLLED?, EDOM is now operational. "There is already in use a small EDOM generator-transmitter which can be concealed on the body of the person ..." The articles are a total of five (5) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD NAPA SENTINEL ARTICLES BY HARRY V. MARTIN AND DAVID CAUL HERE IN PDF.

PICKERING IMPLANT: Please download X-ray picture of what's known as a PICKERING IMPLANT within the brain of Mr. Petit, as confirmed by his Miami, Florida attorney Roy Gelber. Petit was known as a drug pilot and called "burn 'em" by DEA officials in 1982. U.S. Bureau of Prisons Dr. Hill stated to Lambros on November 1, 1995, that the PICKERING IMPLANT is reportedly capable of sending and receiving signals. This in a one (1) page PDF DOCUMENT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD X-RAY OF PICKERING IMPLANT IN MR. PETIT HERE IN PDF.

CHRISTIAN INQUIRER, March 1985, "TINY BRAIN COMPUTER MODIFIES BEHAVIOR." Dr. Sigmund Gieriech and Britain's "Whitehall Scientific Institute for the Betterment of Humanity," placed the tiny computer snugly at the base of the brain of three (3) prisoners at Birmingham's maximum security Rehabilitation Center to see if their behavior patterns can be fixed. The little computer monitors brainwaves. "Whenever a THOUGHT PASSES THROUGH WHICH HAS A CRIMINAL INTENT, IT SENDS OUT A QUICK JOLT OF ELECTRICITY to remind the person that they must not do whatever it is they are thinking about." The device is called an ELECTRO COMPUTER BRAIN ENHANCER (ECBE) and Dr. Ormond Shell had one installed, "I don't even know that it's in my head." The article is one (1) page in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. (Prison Superintendent MAXWELL PRIMM notes, "With the device installed, they [prisoners] have not been able to break a single prison rule.")

DOWNLOAD MARCH 1985 ARTICLE BY CHRISTIAN INQUIRER, HERE IN PDF.

THE CONTROLLERS, by Mediaecco, Box 136, 114-79 Stockholm, Sweden. This article offers an overview of the abduction phenomenon used by the government to cover-up intracerebral implants visible in the X-rays and MRI scans of many UFO abductees. Of notable interest is the work of Dr. Delgado, Dr. Robert G. Heath, of Tulane University who implanted as many as 125 electrodes in a subjects brain in the 1960's, Dr. James Olds, Dr. John Lilly, Dr. Ralph Schwitzgelbel, Dr. Bryan Robinson of the Yerkes primate laboratory, Dr. Antoine Remond, Dr. Robert Becker. Mediaecco also offers an overview of active authors of Mind Control including Walter Bowart, author of "Operation Mind Control", former FBI agent Ted Gunderson and Alexander Constantine. The article is five (5) pages in length in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD "THE CONTROLLERS", HERE IN PDF.

UNDERGROUND ALIEN BASES, by Abelard Productions, Inc, 1990 First printing, offers an excellent overview on MIND MANIPULATION EXPERIMENTS by D.A.R.P.A. (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) at the Dulce Base, Sandia Base by THE JASON GROUP (of 55 Scientists), and Area 51 in Nevada (Dreamland, 'Data Repository Establishment and Maintenance Land'). The book states that the U.S. Government cloned individuals and instilled programming via implants through regular RF transmissions. Also that many humans are also being IMPLANTED with brain transceivers using two procedures: R.H.I.C. (Radio-Hypnotic Intracerebral Control) and E.D.O.M. (Electronic Dissolution of Memory) The brain transceiver is inserted into the head through the nose. These devices are used in the SOVIET UNION AND THE UNITED STATES, AS WELL AS SWEDEN. The Swedish Prime Minister PALME gave the National Swedish Police Board the right in 1973 to insert brain transmitters into the heads of human beings COVERTLY! Attached for your review are pages 34, 35, 36, and 37 from UNDERGROUND ALIEN BASES in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD PAGES 34, 35, 36, AND 37 FROM UNDERGROUND ALIEN BASES HERE IN PDF.

THE ALIENS AND THE SCALPEL, by Roger K. Leir, D.P.M., is the documented true story of one surgeon's research into the retrieval and analysis of WHAT SEEMS to be alien or government implants in humans. Interesting facts include, "As of this writing in August 1998, NBC has just completed filming the eighth surgical process." Page 183; Whitley Strieber thought he had an implant in his ear. Page 107; Brazilian implant victims would turn their faces upward, mouths taut with lips that trembled and eyes filled with tears. Page 133; "Three of the surgeries consisted of the removal of a skin lesion with an ATTACHED SMALL BB-SIZED, GREYISH-WHITE ROUND BALL IN THE UNDERLYING SOFT TISSUE." Page 163.; "The seventh case was totally devoid of biological findings, but it did PRODUCE A CRYSTALLINE OR GLASSLIKE OBJECT. The eighth case produced another CANTELOUPE-SEED-LIKE OBJECT, SIMILAR TO EARLIER ONES." Page 163. "Only one person with an object in the body stated prior to surgery that he was able to HEAR VOICES and attributed this to the foreign object." Page 163; "The samples were small rodlike materials one to two mm. in diameter and less than one cm. in length." Page 166; "The T-shaped object is composed of two small metallic rods" Page 170; "One end is in the shape of a barb, while the opposite end is flat." Page 170; "One such theory pertains to the objects' abilities to act as TRACKING DEVICES OR TRANSPONDERS, thus enabling the subject to be found anywhere on the globe. Another possibility is that they may act as behavior-controlling devices. We know that abductees seem to have compulsive behaviors." "... WE MONITOR OUR ASTRONAUTS WHEN TREY ARE IN SPACE." Pages 170 and 171. Attached for your review are pages 105, 106, 107, 132, 133, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, and 171 from THE ALIENS AND THE SCALPEL. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. It appears that Dr. Roger Leir has produced a video and DVD with STARGATE PRODUCTIONS with great close-ups of the process of surgical removal and of the implants themselves. The video and DVD is available at there web site: www.alienscalpel.com

DOWNLOAD PAGES FROM THE ALIENS AND THE SCALPEL HERE IN PDF.

December 31, 2004, Whitley Strieber reported in his free newsletter "UNKNOWN COUNTRY" that Dr. Roger K. Leir removed an implant that was found to be BROADCASTING ON TWO (2) FM FREQUENCIES. Dr. Leir stated that no patient who has ever had an object removed has reported being troubled further, or has experienced reimplantation. Go to: www.Unknowncountry.com

WHO HOLDS THE CLICKER?, by Lauren Slater, MOTHER JONES, November 2005,
offers excellent background into implant use in the United States, that starts with Robert Heath's deep brain simulation at Tulane University School of Medicine and moves you through the U.S. Government's funding of Dr. Louis Jolyon West of UCLA who implanted prisoners in California prisons. Today, Medtronic, a Minneapolis-based company uses implants to control Parkinson's patients.

DOWNLOAD "WHO HOLDS THE CLICKER?" HERE IN PDF.

MIND OVER MACHINE, by Carl Zimmer, "Some monkey business in a Duke University lab suggests we'll soon be able to move artificial limbs, control robotic soldiers, and communicate across thousands of miles - using nothing but out thoughts." This article appeared in the February 2004, POPULAR SCIENCE magazine. Of interest is the fact, BRAZILIAN MIGUEL NICOLELIS set up a lab at Duke University to implant electrodes into monkey brains instead of rats, hoping to get them to operate more complex equipment with their brains. "Miguel always wants more channels, says biomedical engineer Patrick Wolf with a grin." Popular Science Magazine offers more human-machine interface research at: www.popsci.com/exclusive YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD "MIND OVER MACHINE," BY CARL ZIMMER HERE IN PDF.

May 12, 2004, article by Kevin Maney, in USA TODAY, "GET CHIPPED, THEN CHARGE WITHOUT PLASTIC - YOU ARE THE CARD, states that CYBERKINETICS of Foxborough, Mass., manufactures an implant placed in a person's brain that will control a computer just by thinking. Cyberkinetics received approval from the U.S. Government in April 2004, to implant the chip in five paralyzed people for testing. The May 12, 2004 article and a copy of CYBERKINETICS INC. homepage www.cyberkineticsinc.com dated June 04, 2004 is being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD KEVIN MANEY ARTICLE AND CYBERKINETICS INFORMATION HERE IN PDF.

May 2004, article by Jesse Freund, in Wired Magazine, page 34, "BIONIC EARS." The article offers information on implants used for human-machine interface by the House Ear Institute in Los Angeles, California. The auditory brain stem implant is a gadget that connects an external microphone to eight microscopically thin electrodes jacked directly into nerve tissue. Bob Shannon, a biomedical engineer at the institute stated, "Microelectrodes will be used in the retina for visual stimulation, in the spinal cord for pain control, and to help alleviate paralysis in quadriplegics." The article is being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD JESSE FREUND ARTICLE "BIONIC EARS" HERE IN PDF.

October 3. 2009 letter to NICHOLAS THOMPSON, Senior Editor of WIRED MAGAZINE, as to his article entitled "THE DOOMSDAY MACHINE", Wired, Page 82, October 2009. Lambros requests that Mr. Thompson contact former Soviet Colonel VALERY YARYNICH, as to MIND CONTROL SENSORS PLACED WITHIN HUMANS TO MONITOR FOR NUCLEAR TESTS OR EXPLOSIONS THE WORLD OVER, when he was employed as a 30-year veteran of the Soviet Strategic Rocket Forces and Soviet General Staff, helping to build the "PERIMETER SYSTEM" a.k.a. "MERTVAYA RUKA!", or DEAD HAND. Lambros' letter is two (2) pages and the article is five (5) pages. Total of 7 pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 3, 2009 LETTER TO NICHOLAS THOMPSON HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

THE BOYCOTT AGAINST THE PURCHASE AND IMPORTATION OF BRAZILIAN PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

IS "MAD COW DISEASE" IN BRAZILIAN CATTLE, SHEEP, DEER, ELK, GOATS, AND ASSOCIATED PRODUCTS, SUCH AS DAIRY PRODUCTS??? YOU BE THE JUDGE, AFTER READING THE FOLLOWING!!! AS OF JUNE, 2001 BOTH THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA HAVE BANNED THE IMPORT OF BRAZILIAN BEEF AND ASSOCIATED PRODUCTS.

FACT SHEET FOR "MAD COW DISEASE:" (June, 2001)

1. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) - is commonly called MAD COW DISEASE.

2. BSE was first discovered in Britain in 1986.

3.In the past two years, wider screening of cattle have detected BSE in France, Germany, Ireland and other nations.

4. Mad cow and the human form of the disease are always fatal.

5. More than 100 people, mostly in Britain, have died of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD).

6. BSE could cripple the $175 billion United States beef industry and disrupt trade balance.

7. Creutzfeldt-Jakob is believed to come from eating tainted beef.

8. With an incubation period that could exceed 40 years in humans, nobody knows how many other people could develop the disease. Once symptoms appear, death follows, usually within months.

9. BSE has led to millions of cattle being destroyed globally.

10. BSE will eat away in human brain tissue and leave sponge-like holes.

11. Testing for BSE in animals examine tissue for PRIONS. Prion-diagnosing tests are used after symptoms appear during late stages of the disease in humans, whose tonsils are tested, or on brain and spinal tissue tissue taken from dead animals.

12. No one has yet developed a blood test that can detect the presence of the disease in its early stages.

13. European countries test all slaughtered cows older than 30 months before they enter the food chain.

14. Prion diseases are transmissible between species and bring about slow degeneration of the central nervous system, which inevitably leads to death. A long period elapses between infection and the appearance of the first clinical symptoms. Typically, it is two to four years in sheep, three to six years in cattle and more than 10 years in humans. Once the symptoms appear, death follows within months. Source: University of Zurich and Prionics AG, Switzerland, May 2001.

15. Canada has banned the import of beef and associated products from Brazil.

16. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service restricts the import of cattle from BSE-infected areas. As an extra precaution, the USDA RECENTLY SUSPENDED THE IMPORT OF BEEF AND ASSOCIATED PRODUCTS FROM BRAZIL.

17. There are a number a number of web sites posting current, factual data about BSE. You can log on to:

a. USDA's home page at: www.usda.gov

b. The National Cattlemens Beef Association home page at: www.bseinfo.org

C. The Food and Drug Administrations web site at: www.fda.gov

18. BOYCOTT BRAZIL is attempting to help people understand the BRAZILIAN - "MAD COW" issue. It is essential that all countries suspend the import of BEEF AND ASSOCIATED PRODUCTS FROM BRAZIL so the Brazilian Government may prove what is fact and what is fiction.

19. DAIRY INDUSTRY: milk, cheese, ice cream, butter, cream, buttermilk, yogurt, chocolate milk, fruit flavored dairy drinks, whipping cream, half-and-half, sour cream.

BY-PRODUCTS OF THE DAIRY INDUSTRY: Some by-products of dairy have industrial uses. Lactose, or milk sugar is used in the fermentation process that produces PENICILLIN. Lactose is also a base for pills and used in INFANT FOODS.

BRAZILIAN CORNED BEEF RECALLED OVER INGREDIENTS. The following article by the Associated Press appeared in the Sunday, December 30, 2001, STAR TRIBUNE newspaper. Please e-mail the Agriculture Department in your country and advise them of the recall.

HOW MANY BRAZILIANS HAVE DIED FROM "MAD COW DISEASE"??? As of September 23, 2005, about 150 Britons have died from "MAD COW DISEASE." See, THE WEEK, September 2005, Page 26.

IS BRAZIL "DUMPING" MANUFACTURED GOODS IN UNITED STATES AT LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THOSE GOODS IN BRAZIL? MINNESOTA GOVERNOR JESSE VENTURA THINKS SO!!!!!

1. On March 15, 2001, Minnesota Governor JESSE VENTURA signed Minnesota House File 219 and Senate File 258, the resolution to immediately impose a one-year ban on imports of all steel products from Brazil and other countries. Officials state illegal imports of steel products from BRAZIL and other countries have been the cause of more than 7,000 job losses for steelworkers across the nation in the last six months, including 1,500 jobs in Minnesota. BOYCOTT BRAZIL again thanks Minnesota Governor JESSE VENTURA for his continued support. If you would like a copy of the Bill Titled, "Resolution requesting a ban on the importation of certain steel products, go to the Minnesota Legislature's web page and download a copy and e-mail it to your government officials so they may consider same. Visit the Minnesota Legislature's web page at: www.leg.state.mn.us
2. "DUMPING" is the sale of foreign manufactured goods in United States at less than fair market value of those goods in country of manufacture. See, TARIFF ACT OF 1930, 731 et seq., as amended, 19 U.S.C.A. 1673 et seq. and ZENITH ELECTRONICS CORP. vs. U.S., 988 F.2d 1573 (Fed.Cir. 1993) This case offers an excellent overview on "DUMPING." Also, 755 F-Supp. 397(CIT 1990).
3. Department of Commerce applies reasonable interpretation of Antidumping Act when it construes "principal markets" as ALL MARKETS in country of export in which exporter usually sells merchandise. TARIFF ACT OF 1930, 773(a)(1)(A), as amended, 19 U.S.C.A. 1677b(a)(1)(A).
4. THE FOLLOWING COMPANIES DISTRIBUTE BRAZILIAN PRODUCTS WITHIN THE UNITED STATES:
a. HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION, Austin, Minnesota 55912, Telephone number for questions or comments, please call 1-800-523-4635. Hormel distributes CORNED BEEF that is packed under Brazilian Government Inspection numbers, C.N.P.J. 01.597.168/0013-22, EST. 337.

b. June 2, 2001, letter from LAMBROS to HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION regarding why Hormel Foods is selling "CORNED BEEF" in the can that is produced in BRAZIL when CANADA has BANNED ALL BRAZILIAN BEEF IN THE CAN due to FOOT-AND- MOUTH DISEASE in Brazil. This letter is two (2) pages in length and includes three (3) exhibits. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER NAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD THE JUNE 2, 2001 LETTER TO HORMEL FOODS IN PDF HERE.

c. SAMPCO INC., President David Morrison, President, Suite 3700, 221 North LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60601. As of April 2002 Sampco Inc. was importing 150 - 40 foot containers of Brazilian meat per month from Bertin Ltd., a meatpacker in the heart of Brazil's cattle country. Attached for your review is Lambros' April 10, 2002 and June 1, 2002 letters in PDF FORMAT to David Morrison, President of Sampco Inc. as to Lambros' torture and boycott of Brazilian products. Mr. Morrison HAS NOT responded to Lambros as of July 20, 2002. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD SAMPCO INC. CORRESPONDENCE HERE IN PDF.

d. CARGILL INC., the Minnesota based multinational has more than 120 plants, warehouses, port terminals and farms in Brazil. It counts more than 90 buying stations and employs more than 5,000 people. Cargill is currently assisting in financing the paving of roads from Cuiaba, a city within MATO GROSSO, Brazil to the Amazon River port SANTAREM to ship SOYBEANS. The distance is equivalent to trucking soybeans from Minneapolis to New Orleans. See, THE NEW BREADBASKET, by Kevin Diaz, Sunday March 7, 2004, METRO EDITION. Cargill opened a new export terminal in April 2003 in SANTAREM, Brazil to export soybeans. Brazil is expected to convert 50 million acres to crops by 2014. That's an area the size of Minnesota, and most will be new soybeans. STAR TRIBUNE newspaper.

e. ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND, Illinois-based is also a major player in farming, warehousing and financing the paving of roads from Cuiaba, Brazil to the Amazon River port SANTAREM to ship SOYBEANS. See, THE NEW BREADBASKET, by Kevin Diaz, Sunday March 7, 2004, STAR TRIBUNE article.

f. BUNGE, New York-based, is a major player in farming, warehousing and financing the paving of roads from Cuiaba, Brazil to the Amazon River port SANTAREM to ship SOYBEANS. See, THE NEW BREADBASKET, by Kevin Diaz, Sunday March 7, 2004, STAR TRIBUNE article.

e. JOHN DEERE. John Deere tractors can be found all over Brazil. See, THE NEW BREADBASKET, by Kevin Diaz, Sunday March 7, 2004, STAR TRIBUNE article.

DOWNLOAD MARCH 7, 2004, ARTICLE "THE NEW BREADBASKET" HERE IN PDF.

PRICE--COMPARIS0N SEARCH ENGINE AND LEGITIMATE ESCROW SERVICE ALLOWS YOU VALID OPTIONS SO YOU MAY BOYCOTT AGAINST THE PURCHASE AND IMPORTATION OF BRAZILIAN PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

froogle.google.com --Google's new price-comparison engine (2003), Froogle, will peek into the remote corners of the world and web for the best prices on the products you now purchase from Brazil. Search for any imaginable item that Brazil currently exports and beat the price. Hone your hunt using the Advanced Search page, where you can limit hits to products within a certain price range or in a particular category - tremendously helpful in zooming in on your dream deal.

www.escrow.com --Boycott Brazil recommends using escrow.com, which was the first online escrow business certified under California's escrow laws, the United States most stringent, to protect all selling and buying of products on the internet.

www.transrow.com --In addition to relying on a legitimate escrow service, you might try a service like Transrow, which helps sellers (mostly for high-end transactions) verify bidders by requiring them to deposit funds or submit a driver's license and credit reference.

www.sos4auctions.com --This site offers clues for spotting scam escrow web sites as more than a hundred have popped up in 2002.

www.bbbonline.org --The Better Business Bureau is another excellent place to visit to check a credit reference.

BOYCOTT BRAZIL WILL STOP CHILD SLAVERY ON BRAZILIAN COCOA FARMS

On October 1, 2001, Sumana Chatterjee, published the article "COCOA INDUSTRY TO FIGHT SLAVERY." The article offers an excellent overview on cocoa farmers enslaving children in the Ivory Coast, a West African nation that supplies 43 percent of U.S. cocoa, the raw ingredient of chocolate. BRAZIL is the second largest supplier of Cocoa in the world. Boycott Brazil is requesting your assistance in contacting your local grocery store and the World Cocoa Foundation in boycotting BRAZILIAN COCOA due to child slavery and other forms of exploitation by Brazilian cocoa farmers. This article is two (2) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD "COCOA INDUSTRY TO FIGHT SLAVERY" ARTICLE IN PDF.

BRAZIL'S SHOE INDUSTRY "CHILD LABOR" AND "HIGH IMPORT DUTIES"

1. May 15, 1995, the Wall Street Journal reported that Brazil raised import duties on shoes to as much as 63% from 20% and offered incentives to encourage investment to modernize shoe production. WHY SHOULDN'T U.S. DOMESTIC SHOEMAKERS BE GIVEN INCENTIVES AND FAVORABLE CONSIDERATIONS IN SELLING SHOES? On September 5, 1995, Lambros wrote Dr. Kathy M. Hawk, Director of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons, requesting a boycott of all Brazilian shoes and boots from U.S. Prisons to protect United States shoe makers and support Lambros' boycott of Brazilian goods.

2. In 1994, the United States Department of State "HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT FOR BRAZIL" stated "Independent shoe manufactures in Franca (Sao Paulo state) [Brazil] continue to employ thousands of children under age 14, in violation of the law." The report also states illegally employed children and adolescents from 7 to 17 years of age are used by sugar cane growers, orange growers, and mining and logging industries. This page from report, letter to Hawk, and the Wall Street Journal article are three (3) pages in PDF FORMAT. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD 1994 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT FOR BRAZIL HERE IN PDF.

JURUA REGION OF BRAZIL

Greenpeace recalled about 500 promotional mousepads because the WATER that was used to produce their rubber surfaces was found to harbor harmful FUNGAL SPORES. The WATER came from the Jurua region of Brazil. This was reported in the January 2001, YAHOO! INTERNET LIFE Magazine on page 42. BOYCOTT BRAZIL has issued a health alert as to all products from the Jurua region of Brazil.

BOLIVIA IS FREE OF INCOME AND CAPITAL GAINS TAXES

As of 1997, Bolivia offered the global investment community trusts and savings accounts FREE of income and capital gains taxes. Boycott Brazil is suggesting all investors in Brazil to research the favorable tax laws within Bolivia and consider your options.

ASTROTURF SINISTER SEAWEED LIKELY TO INVADE WATERS IN BRAZIL - WITH NO BAN.

CAULERPA TAXIFOLIA, a beautiful but sinister seaweed has taken over the Mediterranean Sea in the last few years, choking corals, blanketing sandy bottoms and fouling fisherman's nets. Environmentalists fear that it could

invade waters in BRAZIL, where it is presently confined to tanks in aquarium stores and fish collectors' homes. Once the CAULERPA TAXIFOLIA is in home aquariums, the weed could easily make it into the wild. Many aquarium owners dump the contents into local waterways, under the mistaken impression that they are "freeing" the plants and animals.

The seaweed in question has been compared to living Astroturf because of its carpet-like growth. The original Caulerpa lives in the Red Sea. But the form that is spreading was bred in European aquariums. It was released into the Mediterranean by the aquarium in Monaco and now covers tens of thousands of acres off the coasts of Italy and France.

Wherever Caulerpa grows, scientists say, nothing else does. It smothers all other sea life. Fisherman working in affected sites haul up nets full of Caulerpa and little more. Almost nothing can get rid of the weed. "They tried warm water, they tried copa (coconut fiber), they tried salt," says Alexandre Meinesz of the University of Nice. The Caulerpa always grows back. BOYCOTT BRAZIL is against importing anything that is dangerous to the Brazilian environment and supports the ban of Caulerpa Taxifolia into Brazil.

MOLD OVERWHELMS BRAZIL - PROBLEMS GROW IN HOTELS, APARTMENTS, OFFICES, AND SHOPS

MOLD is causing confusion and fear in Brazil's commercial real-estate market, not to mention a significant health concern - from apartments to hotels to shopping centers.

The fungal growth, found in damp or wet conditions, has been blamed for a number of health problems, including breathing difficulties, headaches, nausea, gastrointestinal ailments, skin rashes, severe allergic reactions and neurological damage. The United States incurred over $1.3 billion in home-owner's insurance claims in 2001 due to mold-related expense costs, says the Insurance Information Institute, a New York-based trade group. The problem being most severe in California and Texas.

In July 2002, the Hilton Hotels Corp. shut down one of six towers that comprise the Hilton Hawaiian Village in Waikiki after investigators discovered mold. As of December 2002, Hilton has taken charges totaling $20 million for cleanup. A spokesman says the 454 guest rooms in the 25-story tower would remain closed for at least six more months.

In August 2002, KDF North Hills, Orange County, California paid $900,000.00 to a mother and her three children after their mold-infested rental apartment made them sick.

BOYCOTT BRAZIL is requesting all buyers and rental tenants of property in Brazil to add MOLD INSPECTION as part of the industry's due-diligence process before taking on a transaction. Buyers/renters need to (1) watch for clues on property tours such as leaks, wet spots, condensation and stains or musty odors; (2) ask property managers, engineers and occupants about MOLD; (3) obtain copies of all existing indoor air quality and mold reports; (4) consider performing a MOLD survey if warning signs exist; and (5) review property and casualty insurance, watch for mold and environmental exclusions.

--BUGLER NEWS SERVICE quoting www.brazilboycott.org

TAMARISK - SALT CEDAR TREE - SOAKS MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF WATER AND CROWDS OUT NATIVE PLANT LIFE IN BRAZIL

TAMARISK, also known as salt cedar has been spotted invading Brazil's springs, ditches and wetlands. The bushy tree sucks up hundreds of billions of gallons of water a year and crowds out native plants along rivers. It can grow up to a foot a month, to a height of 30 feet. The leaves secrete salt, making nothing else grow on the ground below. Mature trees produce up to 500,000 seeds a year and spread easily, sprouting wherever the soil is moist. BOYCOTT BRAZIL recommends any person purchasing land in Brazil to investigate for TAMARISK before purchasing. As usual, the Brazilian government is NOT supporting the removal of TAMARISK with federal funding before the risk spreads to any place the plant can tap into the water supply.
-- BUGLER NEWS SERVICE, quoting www.brazilboycott.org

BEDBUGS (Cimex lectularius) SUCK THE BLOOD OF SLEEPING BRAZILIANS AND TOURISTS IN BRAZIL

BEDBUGS (Cimex lectularius) about the size of a ladybug, 1/5 inch long as adults, have been keeping exterminator's busy in Brazil, as bedbug populations are surging due to Brazilian travelers within Brazil who bring the bloodsucking pests into hotels and their homes in luggage. Hotels and apartment buildings seem to bear the brunt of the bedbug problem, according to pest-control companies in Brazil, as bedbugs like to stay close to its preferred prey: sleeping Brazilian's. Eradicating bedbugs are notoriously difficult, often requiring hotel owners to throw out mattresses. Brazilian's are known to be cheap, thus throwing out a mattress may not occur. BOYCOTT BRAZIL recommends all travelers to Brazil to check hotel rooms for bedbugs before going to sleep.

-- BUGLER NEWS SERVICE, quoting www.brazilboycott.org

KUDZU - INVADING BRAZIL AT A FOOT A DAY

KUDZU, a green leafy vine native to China and Japan has increased damage to timber producers and crops throughout Brazil. The Brazilian government refuses to import Bean Plataspids, another Asian import, that munches on the fast-growing kudzu. Kudzu vines can grow up to a foot a day. Boycott Brazil has received reports from supporters that it is common for kudzu vines to form a thick mat as they grow and change the natural habitat, as it climbs over trees, utility poles and anything else in its path in Brazil.

-- BUGLER NEWS SERVICE (2011).

RED-TIDE POSSIBLY LINGERING ALONG BRAZIL'S 4,500 MILE ATLANTIC COASTLINE.

April 11, 2005, Boycott Brazil was informed that a toxic algae bloom has been lingering along areas of Brazil's 4,500-mile (7,200-kilometer) Atlantic coastline that is rimmed with sandy beaches and narrow but fertile coastal plains interspersed with low hills. RED-TIDE, frequently reddish-brown, is the colloquial name for several types of microscopic algae that sometimes bloom near coasts. Some believe the first of the ten (10) plagues of Egypt described in the Bible was a red tide: "... and all the waters that were in the river turned to blood. And the fish that were in the river died, and the water stank." The algae, called KARENIA BREVIS, produces a poison called a brevetoxin. Though not deadly, it can cause neurotoxic shellfish poisoning in people who eat contaminated fish and asthma-like symptoms in those who breath in the oderless toxic particles that can BLOW OFF THE WAVES UP TO ONE (1) MILE INLAND. Once a year, the KARENIA BREVIS population undergoes an explosion for reasons scientists can't explain. The number of the creatures can go from 1,000 in a liter of ocean water to more than 1 million. WHY DOESN'T BRAZIL'S GOVERNMENT GIVE WARNINGS TO BRAZILIMS AND TOURISTS WHEN THEY VISIT THE BEACH WHEN A RED TIDE IS PRESENT? Florida offers red-tide updates for beaches at www.floridamarine.org.

4,500 BRAZILIAN ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS DEPORTED BY THE UNITED STATES IN 2004 BY PLANE - MOST NOT INFORMED OF RIGHT TO CONTACT BRAZILIAN CONSULATE. See, USA TODAY, "ILLEGALS GOING BACK BY THE PLANELOAD," February 17, 2005.

Brazilian illegal immigrants that have been deported from the United States to Brazil in 2004 have complained that the VIENNA CONVENTION was violated when the arresting authorities in the U.S. failed to inform them, as a foreign national, they had a right to contact the Brazilian Consulate. See, Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (Vienna Convention), April 24, 1963, [1970] 21 U.S.T. 77, T.I.A.S. No. 6820. Also see, BREARD vs. GREENE, 140 L.Ed.2d 529 (1998)
If you are a Brazilian criminal in the USA illegally or an illegal Brazilian immigrant who has committed no crimes other than violations of visa limits and other immigration laws in the USA, you must contact the Brazilian Consulate in the USA so the Consul may advise you as to your legal rights. The arresting authority will also appoint you an attorney at no cost if you do not have money. Therefore, you are receiving legal assistance from both the Brazilian Consul and an attorney.
IMPORTANT: If you don't assert your right under the Vienna Convention to have the arresting authority contact the Brazilian Consulate to provide you with FREE LEGAL ADVICE, you default on any claims. Boycott Brazil believes Brazilian's and the legal authority that arrests them in the USA have an excellent claim in bringing suit against Brazil if the Brazilian Consulate REFUSES to visit the jailed Brazilian, alleging a denial of rights under the Vienna Convention.

BRAZILIAN FLEEING TO U.S.A. DUE TO MASS MILITARY "BRAIN CONTROL IMPLANT PROGRAM." On May 10, 2005, the Wall Street Journal reported that the number of Brazilians attempting to use Mexico as a springboard to enter the U.S. is skyrocketing. "In the past seven months, the U.S. Border Patrol has caught more than 15,000 UNDOCUMENTED BRAZILIANS, compared with fewer than 10,000 in each of the previous two years. Last month, nearly 150 Brazilian migrants were seized on a single day near McAllen, Texas." The article reported that over 25,000 illegal undocumented Brazilians will attempt to enter the U.S.A. along the U.S.Mexico border in 2005. See, "MEXICO FOCUSES ON BRAZILIANS AMID U.S. MIGRANT CONCERNS," by Joel Millman with contributions by Geraldo Samor in Rio de Janiero and Robert Block in Washington.

SNAKEHEAD FISH LIKELY TO INVADE AMAZON RIVER IN BRAZIL - WITH NO BAN.

Boycott Brazil has been informed by sources in Brazil that anglers caught one of twenty-eight species of snakehead in the waters of the Amazon River that flows into the Atlantic Ocean. The Amazon River flows a thousand miles upstream from Manaus, Brazil into the Atlantic Ocean. The snakehead is a non-native hardy fish native to China that can travel on land and eat so much that it can destroy an ecosystem. In 2002, the United States Department of the Interior banned the import of 28 species of snakehead fish. Brazil's largest lakes, Mirim (Brazil-Uruguay), Patos (actually lagoons), and major rivers, Amazon, Madeira, Negro, Para, Parana, Sao Francisco, are in danger of the invasive snakehead fish. BOYCOTT BRAZIL is against importing anything that is dangerous to the Brazilian environment and supports the ban of snakehead fish into Brazil.

COMMERCIAL SHIPPING DUMPING INVASIVE SPECIES INTO AMAZON RIVER IN BRAZIL

June 2004, Boycott Brazil has just received a report that oceangoing vessels have been dumping invasive species of fish into the Amazon River through ballast tanks that may contain 2 million gallons of water, as the vessel takes on grain or other cargo. The invaders include Sea Lamprey (Atlantic Ocean); Round Goby (Black and Caspian seas); Quagga Mussels (Black and Caspian seas); Spiny Water Flea (Northern Europe and Russia); Zebra Mussels (Western Russia near Caspian Sea and Europe). BOYCOTT BRAZIL is against anything dangerous to the Brazilian environment and supports the ban on the above listed invasive species into Brazil.

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL SAND IS A PETRI DISH OF BACTERIA - BACTERIA MAY LINGER WITHIN ALL THE SAND OF BRAZIL'S 4,500 MILE ATLANTIC COASTLINE.

Contaminated water closes beaches but it is the sand that typically harbors the bacteria within Rio de Janeiro's beach sand. Because microbes can survive longer in Rio's sand, they could pose more health risk than water-borne bacteria. Studies within the U.S. have usually shown sand has levels of bacteria five to 10 times higher than water, says Clean Beaches Council president Walter McLeod. In 2003, studies found bacteria levels in sand at freshwater beaches in Chicago averaged up to 10 times that of swimming water and the sand had to be replaced. BOYCOTT BRAZIL is alerting all parents of children who use the beaches in Rio de Janeiro to tell kids to keep hands out of their mouths while digging in the sand and that everyone wash hands thoroughly after a day at the shore.

PHOSPHORUS SHOULD BE BANNED IN BRAZIL.

September 27, 2005, "MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT OR ORDER, DUE TO INTERVENING CHANGE IN CONTROLLING LAW, U.S. vs. BOOKER, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (January 12, 2005), UNDER ANY ONE OF THREE SEPARATE SUBSECTIONS OF FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(b) - SECTIONS ONE (1), FIVE (5), AND SIX (6)." This document is a total of seventeen (17) pages including cover letter and exhibits in LAMBROS vs. USA, Criminal File No. 4-89-82(5), District of Minnesota. This document is in PDF FORMAT and numbered in the lower right hand corner to assist readers. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
Boycott Brazil is requesting Brazil to ban phosphorus from fertilizers used on residential lawns, to protect Brazilian lakes and rivers from an over-abundance of phosphorus that can cause ALGAE BLOOM, effectively choking other aquatic plants and depleting oxygen supply. One (1) pound of phosphorus can grow five-hundred (500) pounds of algae and costs approximately $350 to remove one (1) pound of algae from a lake in the United States. BOYCOTT BRAZIL is against anything dangerous to the Brazilian environment and supports the ban on phosphorus.

BRAZIL FORCES ALL U.S. CITIZENS TO BE FINGERPRINTED AND PHOTOGRAPHED TO ENTER BRAZIL

1. January 15, 2004, American Airline pilot DALE HIRSH, age 52, was arrested for allegedly making an obscene gesture during immigration formalities at Sao Paulo's Guarulhos International Airport. Brazilian police imposed a $12,750 FINE. Sounds like another Brazilian rip-off to Boycott Brazil supporters.

2. February 8, 2004, DOUGLAS SKOLNICK of New Jersey is the second American to pay a fine for allegedly making an obscene gesture during fingerprinting and photographing process during entry into the Brazilian town of Foz do Iguacu with his tour group. SKOLNICK, 55, was allowed to pay $17,200 FINE. Again, this sounds like another Brazilian rip-off.

DOWNLOAD ARTICLES ON DALE HIRSH AND DOUGLAS SKOLNICK HERE IN PDF.

CRAZY ANTS" BEING TRANSPORTED FROM BRAZIL TO UNITED STATES - U.S. MUST STOP IMPORTS FROM BRAZIL!!!!

1. "CRAZY ANTS", also known as Nylanderia fulva, because of their unpredictable movements and swarming populations, are reddish-brown, measure about one-eighth of an inch long and have a hankering for honeydew melon. The CRAZY ANTS have been entering the United States via cargo containers from Brazil and have mostly infested Texas, Florida, Mississippi and Louisiana. Cost to protect one acre of land from the CRAZY ANTS is about $$2,300 per year. Thus land decreases in value if not treated. In Brazil, the ants are killing off all other ant species and killing small animals by asphyxiation. They have attacked the eyes, noses and hooves of larger animals, such as cattle, and dried out entire grasslands. BOYCOTT BRAZIL believes the best policy is to inform U.S. citizens o-.1' the "CRAZY ANTS" from Brazil and ask them to boycott all products from Brazil. This entry is dated: September 4, 2013.

DON'T GET ARRESTED IN SAO PAULO OR RIO de JANEIRO, BRAZIL - POLICE KILL MORE SUSPECTS THAN ALMOST ANYWHERE ELSE IN THE WORLD !!!!

1. The Wall Street Journal reported on July 13-14, 2013, that "Police in Sao Paulo state killed one suspect for every 229 they arrested last year, according to government figures, compared with one per 31,575 in the USA in 2011." "The phenomenon is hardly confined to Sao Paulo. In fact, Sao Paulo police are among Brazil's least lethal. Despite experiments with community policing, Rio de Janeiro police kill suspects at nearly four (4) times the rate of Sao Paulo police, Rio de Janeiro police statistics show. The symbol of Rio's tactical police is a skull with two pistols and a knife crossed through it." BOYCOTT BRAZIL does not recommend travel to Brazil.

BRAZILIAN MARCELO TENORIO RECEIVED ASYLUM IN UNITED STATES IN 1993

Brazilian MARCELO TENORIO received ASYLUM in the United States based on sexual orientation in July 1993 from an immigration judge in San Francisco. TENORIO had been hunted down by antigay commando groups in Brazil. This case was funded by the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, a gay-rights group, in an effort to ease federal asylum rules for gays.

PROCTOR AND GAMBLE

On November 21, 1995 letter from Vietnam Veterans of America to Edwin L. Artzt, the Chief Executive Officer of Proctor & Gamble Corporation
On November 21, 1995 letter from Vietnam Veterans of America to Edwin L. Artzt, the Chief Executive Officer of Proctor & Gamble Corporation
January 8, 1996 letter from Lambros to Edwin L. Artzt, the Chief Executive Officer of Proctor & Gamble Corporation, and to the editor of Coffee Intelligence, a trade magazine
February 1, 1996 letter from Lambros to Edwin L. Artzt, the Chief Executive Officer of Proctor & Gamble Corporation, and to the editor of Coffee Intelligence, a trade magazine
April 19th, 1996 letter from Lambros to Edwin L. Artzt, the Chief Executive Officer of Proctor & Gamble Corporation

COFFEE DEALERS AND INDUSTRY PUBLICATIONS

January 8, 1996 letter from Lambros to the Editor of Coffee Intelligence, a trade magazine, and to Edwin L Artzt, the Chief Executive Officer of Proctor & Gamble Corporation
February 1, 1996 letter from Lambros to the Editor of Coffee Intelligence, a trade magazine, and to Edwin L. Artzt, the Chief Executive Officer of Proctor & Gamble Corporation

July 12, 1996 letter from Lambros to President of Starbucks Coffee regarding the boycott of Brazilian products and services due to the torture of John Gregory Lambros.

September 12, 1996 reply letter from VP at Starbucks to Lambros regarding the boycott of Brazilian products.

GREEN BEANS FAIR TRADE COFFEE CAMPAIGN. You can have your cup and enjoy it guilt-free by buying NON-BRAZILIAN shade-grown coffee from small, independent growers and certified retailers. Visit this site to locate fair-trade vendors, or get involved in grass-roots activism. Be sure to let everyone you visit know that you support the boycott of Brazilian COFFEE. Proctor and Gamble Corporation buys Brazilian coffee to be placed within FOLGERS COFFEE.
Web site: www.globalexchange.org/economy/coffee

THE PORT OF NEW ORLEANS, New Orleans, Louisiana, completed in 1993, the world's largest bulk coffee processing plant. A custom-designed computer system cleans, weighs, sorts and blends BRAZILIAN COFFEE before it is shipped off to roasters. The facility is located on "COFFEE CIRCLE" within THE PORT OF NEW ORLEANS. The name of the facility is "SILOCAF."

December 2, 2003, Catholic Relief Services (CRS) announced an initiative to assist 25 million families that grow coffee in 50 DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. CRS will sell fair-trade coffee among the 65 million Catholics in the United States. The program includes organizations from the Lutheran, Presbyterian and Methodist communities. It encourages the 19,000 Catholic parishes in the USA to endorse and sell fair-trade coffee. Reported on December 2, 2003, USA TODAY, Page 7D, by In-Sung Yoo.

DOWNLOAD DECEMBER 2, 2003, FAIR TRADE COFFEE ARTICLE HERE IN PDF.

COMPUTER HELP NEEDED

1995 Request for computer literate volunteers or interns to assist in the computerized promotion of the boycott of Brazilian products and services.

July 20, 1996 memo from Vietnam Veterans of America, Chapter 75 to all Internet Surfers asking for help building pressure on Brazil with respect to the torture of John Gregory Lambros.

July 20, 1996 memo from Vietnam Veterans of America, Chapter 75 to all editors and publishers about the threat of electronic mind control.

FACTORS AFFECTING CREDIT, BUSINESS AND TRAVEL TO BRAZIL

  1. January 3, 1996 letter from Lambros to TRW Credit Information Services and President of Equifax Information Services Center
  2. January 14, 1996 memorandum from Lambros to All Senators, Congressmen & Congresswomen
  3. January 21, 1996 letter from Lambros to Helen Roth, Specialist for TRW Information Systems & Services
  4. May 1, 1996 letter from Lambros to the Medical Information Bureau (MIB)
  5. May 11, 1996 letter from Lambros to TRW, Equifax & Trans Union
  6. March 29, 1996 letter from Lambros to the Medical Information Bureau (MIB)
  7. GENERAL ELECTRIC WILL NOT LEND MONEY IN BRAZIL. General Electric's biggest profit engine and one of the largest nonbank lenders in the world, with $233 billion in assets, $24 billion in annual revenue and aftertax profit of $4.5 billion in 2004: GE Commercial Finance, WILL NOT do business in BRAZIL. Michael Neal, Vice Chairman, GE Commercial Finance, stated that he will not do business in Brazil and "does business only in places with a stable government and a LEGAL SYSTEM THAT PROTECTS THE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF FOREIGNERS." See, "MONEY MACHINE," Forbes Magazine, November 14, 2005, Pages 175-176.
    "MONEY MACHINE" ARTICLE IN PDF FORMAT HERE.
  8. GETTING PAID BY A BRAZILIAN: If you must do business with a Brazilian person or business, here are a few tips on how to get paid. (a) Telephone your banker and he will suggest one of three payment methods: payment in advance, a letter of credit, or a sight or time draft. If you need to go on your own, PayPal (www.paypal.com) is good for payments on transactions of less than $10,000 and VeriSign's CyberCash (www.cybercash.com) and Worldpay (www.worldpay.com) both accept multi-currency payments and offer specialized options. On larger trans- actions, Ec-Finance.com and AVG Letter of Credit Management LLC (www.avgtsg.com) are two reputable companies offering letters of credit that guarantee payment.

FOREIGN EXCHANGE PROGRAMS FOR STUDENTS IN BRAZIL


  1. June 13, 1996 letter from Lambros to the CIEE, IIE, NAFSA and American Field Service
  2. June 14, 1996 letter from Lambros to Earl G. Graves, Editor of The Black Enterprise
  3. "SCIENCE WITHOUT BORDERS" PROGRAM: On September 10, 2012, Forbes Magazine reported that Brazil's president, DILMA ROUSSEFF aims to train more - and better -scientists and engineers. Until now few Brazilians have studied abroad. Last year only 9,000 Brazilians studied in the U.S. (excluding language students), compared with 260,000 from China and India. Under Rousseff's SCIENCE WITHOUT BORDERS PROGRAM, by 2015 that figure will jump to 100,000 (U.S. schools have already agreed to take 20,000)." See, Forbes Magazine, September 10, 2012, "THE REAL DEAL,", by Alexis Glick with Meghan Casserly and Ricardo Geromel, page 65 thru 69. Id. at 69. Are the students obtaining education to advance Brazil's "MIND CONTROL PROGRAM" through implanted, computer devices in human beings that continues within experiments by Brazilian government and corporate laboratories in which HUMAN SUBJECTS -- usually unwilling and unsuspecting GUINEA PIGS - ARE HAVING COMPUTER CHIPS AND TRANSMITTING DEVICES IMPLANTED INTO THEIR CEREBRAL HEMISPHERES (e.g. their brains), auditory (ear) organ, and elsewhere in their bodies? The real question is how many of the Brazilian students that will be part of the "SCIENCE WITHOUT BORDERS" program will be implanted with radio-transmitters in their heads and brains illegally and legally by Brazil's president, DILMA ROUSSEFF BEFORE THEY STUDY IN THE UNITED STATES??

BRAZILIAN LAW FIRMS

  1. February 5, 1996 letter from Carvalho Tess and Fleury E Rubira
  2. March 26, 1996 letter from Vietnam Veterans of American, Chapter #75 to Brazilian Law Firms
  3. April 6, 1996 letter from Lambros to Eduardo Carvalho Tess
  4. June 14, 1991, LETTER AND "LEGAL OPINION" from the Rio de Janeiro, Brazil law firm of ESCRITORIO DE ADVOCACIA RUY RIBEIRO, Av. Erasmo Braga, 277s/608-612, Tel. No. 242-9408, 252-8796, 242-4873, 242-4874. Fax (021) 242-1154. This law firm was selected from a list of law firms offered to LAMBROS by the U.S. Embassy when they visited LAMBROS after his arrest. Counsel JOHN LOWELL offered the list to LAMBROS. Attorneys within this firm in May 1989 included: Affonso C.S. Bandeira de Mello, Albert Dau, Arnaldo C.R. Moreira, Caetano.E. Fonseca Costa, Carla Bandeira de Mello, Renato Cunha Ribeiro, Ruy Ludolf Ribeiro, Ronald Madeira Maia, and Vernon Dale McNamee. This firm allegedly specializes in the following areas of law: general practice, civil law, PENAL LAW, commercial law, taxation, capital market, maritime/aeronautical, estate, investments, administrative law, and government relations. LAMBROS paid an initial fee for the following "LEGAL OPINION," (WHICH IS NOT A VALID ASSESSMENT OF BRAZILIAN LAW, See, State of Washington vs. Martin Shaw Pang, 940 P.2d 1293 (Wash. 1997)) and decided not to pay the $100,000.00 fee the firm requested with no guarantees. This document includes a two (2) page letter and a four (4) page "LEGAL OPINION" as to Extradition Process Number 539 - 1/120: JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

    DOWNLOAD LETTER AND "LEGAL OPINION" DOCUMENTS IN PDF.

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL ATTORNEY CARLOS ROBERTO SCHLESINGER AND ATTORNEY NELIO ROBERTO SEIDL MACHADO. BOTH ATTORNEYS REPRESENTED JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS DURING HIS EXTRADITION TO THE UNITED STATES FROM RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL IN 1991 AND 1992.

  1. June/July 2000 MEMORANDUM from Lambros to all Boycott Brazil Supporters requesting assistance in placing internet message within Brazil and Argentine internet newsgroups requesting assistance in DISBARMENT PROCEEDINGS against Attorneys Schlesinger and Machado.
  2. June 29, 2000, letter from the Central Intelligence Agency, Washington, D.C. to John G. Lambros as to Lambros' June 13, 2000 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request pertaining to Brazilian lawyers Carlos Roberto Schlesinger and Nelio Roberto Seidl Machado, both from Rio de Janeiro,Brazil. Please note that the CIA has refused to confirm nor deny the existence or nonexistence of any CIA records on either attorney. Lambros believes that both attorneys are past and/or present CIA operatives. (2 pages in length).
  3. The following 1991 letter from Brazilian Attorney Carlos Roberto Schlesinger to the Lambros family stating John Gregory Lambros is OK and requesting money. This is an excellent example as to the continued LIES and untruths by Attorneys Schlesinger and Machado. For example, the letter states "We repeat that we don't have material proofs, and that, in Brazil, WE DON'T HAVE THE CRIME OF CONSPIRACY This is not true, as conspiracy is included and referred to in Brazil's Penal Code as "concurso de agentes." In fact, conspiracy to distribute cocaine is specifically addressed in Brazilian Law No. 6368, Article 14, and carries a sentence of 3-10 years and an Statute of Limitations of 16 years. See, December 19, 1997 letter to John Gregory Lambros from Martin Shaw Pang's Attorney Timothy Dole, Seattle, Washington and Attorney Roberto B. Dias da Silva, Sao Paulo, Brazil. This is a two (2) page letter in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

    DOWNLOAD 1991 LETTER BY BRAZILIAN ATTORNEY CARLOS ROBERTO SCHLESINGER HERE IN PDF.

  4. August 28, 1991, Motion to Senior Brazilian Supreme Court Judge CARLOS VELLOSO by Lambros' Brazilian Attorneys Machado and Schlesinger, OAB/RJ 23,532 and OAB/RJ 30.054, in the extradition of Lambros from Brazil. This document is typed in the PORTUGUESE LANGUAGE and eighteen (18) pages in length in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. (This document has been reduced to nine (9) pages, two pages per page).

    DOWNLOAD AUGUST 28, 1991, MOTION TO BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CARLOS VELLOSO HERE IN PDF.

  5. March 6, 1992, Motion to the Brazilian Supreme Court by Lambros' Brazilian Attorney Nelio Roberto Seidl Machado, OAB/RJ 23.532, in the extradition of Lambros from Brazil. This document is typed in the PORTUGUESE LANGUAGE and twenty (20) pages in length in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. (This document has been reduced to ten (10) pages, two pages per page)

    DOWNLOAD MARCH 6, 1992, MOTION BY NELIO ROBERTO SEIDL MACHADO TO BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT HERE IN PDF.

  6. May 17, 1993, FAX to Attorney Carlos Roberto Schlesinger from Minnesota Attorney at Law JEFFREY L. ORREN, St. Paul, Minnesota. Attorney Orren requested Attorney Schlesinger for the extradition numbers of LOUIS CARLOS ANDREACI and Aly Ayoub (a/k/a/ TONY) and also CONFIRMED THE PLACEMENT OF BIO-MEDICAL IMPLANTS IN BRAZILIAN JAILS. ATTORNEY SCHLESINGER NEVER RESPONDED. Also attached is an information sheet on Luis Carlos Andreaci. The two (2) documents are in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT. Schlesinger's fax number was 011-55-21-222-3822.

    DOWNLOAD MAY 17, 1993, FAX FROM ATTORNEY ORREN TO ATTORNEY SCHLESINGER HERE IN PDF.

UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN BRAZIL

1. May 29, 1991, letter from John A. Lowell, Consul for the United States of America Embassy in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil to John G. Lambros, as to his visit on May 24, 1991 with Lambros. PLEASE NOTE THAT LOWELL HAD GUARANTEED LAMBROS HE WOULD RECEIVE A "HEARING" IN RIO de JANEIRO. The hearing never occurred and Lambros was taken to Brasilia, Brazil and tortured. Also attached is my October 16, 2000 letter to Attorney Stenmoe requesting that he forward John A. Lowell's May 29, 1991 letter to the court.

2. June 19, 1996, letter and addendum to U.S. Assistant Attorney Douglas Ray Peterson, St. Paul, Minnesota, requesting a MATERIAL WITNESS WARRANT FOR THE ARREST OF MARGARET MURPHY, U.S. CONSEL GENERAL FOR THE AMERICAN EMBASSY IN BRASILIA, BRAZIL. On January 11, 1993, the American Embassy in Brasilia, Brazil received a SUBPOENA for Margaret Murphy, Counsel General, American Embassy Brasilia, to appear on January 14, 1993, in the United States District Court, District of Minnesota, Courtroom three (3) at 9:00 a.m. MARGARET MURPHY DID NOT APPEAR NOR FORWARD "ANY AND ALL RECORDS RELATING TO JOHN LAMBROS." The subpoena was issued by U.S. Federal Judge Diana E. Murphy. Copy of the January 11, 1993 SUBPOENA is attached as an exhibit. WHY WASN'T LAMBROS' TRIAL STOPPED UNTIL THE U.S. MARSHALS COULD SECURE AND TRANSPORT MARGARET MURPHY TO LAMBROS' TRIAL???? This eight page document has been copied so two pages appear on one page, thus a TOTAL OF FIVE (5) PAGES IN PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD JUNE 19, 1996 LETTER AND SUBPOENA FOR MARGARET MURPHY HERE IN PDF.

FRANCISCO TOSCANINO - COVER-UP BY BRAZIL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND MINNESOTA U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE

1. In January 1973s Francisco Toscanino was lured and kidnapped from his home in Montevideo, Uruguay and turned over Brazilians who brought him to to Brasilia, Brazil where he was tortured and interrogated while the U.S. Government and the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York received reports. Furthermore, during his period of torture and interrogation a member of the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs was present at one or more intervals and actually participated in portions of the interrogation. Toscanino's captors denied him sleep for days at a time. Nourishment was provided intravenously in a manner precisely equal to an amount necessary to keep him alive. Toscanino was forced to walk up and down a hallway for seven or eight hours at a time. When he could no longer stand he was kicked and beaten but all in a manner contrived to punish without scarring. When he would not answer, his fingers were pinched with metal pliers. Alcohol was flushed into his eye and nose and other fluids .... were forced up his anal passage. Incredibly, these agents of the United States government attached electrodes to Toscanino's earlobes, toes, and genitals. Jarring jolts of electricity were shot throughout his body, rendering him unconscious for indeterminate periods of time but again leaving no physical scars. Finally on January 25, 1973 Toscanino was brought to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil drugged by Brazilian-America agents and placed on a flight to New York and delivered to Thomas Puccio, Assistant U.S. Attorney to be arrested on a indictment returned by a grand jury on February 22, 1973. See, U.S. vs. FRANCISCO TOSCANINO, 500 F.2d 267, 269-270 (2nd. Cir. 1974).

2. On October 20, 1991, the Sunday newspaper article from CAMPINAS, [Sao Paulo, Brazil] entitled "MAFIOSO DA CAMORRA PRESO SOFREU TORTURAS NA DITADURA" by Jose Francisco Pacola, states FRANCISCO TOSCANINO is currently being held at the Federal Police Station in Brasilia, Brazil awaiting his extradition to Italy. The article appears below without the picture of Francisco Toscanino due to poor image quality.

The above October 20, 1991, article was mailed to Lambros by the son of FRANCISCO TOSCANIN0 - MAXIME TOSCANIN0 - on February 12, 1996, thru Attorney Jeff Orren.
Maxime stated that his father Francisco Toscanino was in a maximum security prison near Naples, Italy and offered the name of Francisco Toscanino's lawyer DURING HIS EXTRADITION TO ITALY - DR. JULIO CARDELLA, RUA GENERAL OSORIO, 939, CAMPINAS SAO PAULO, BRAZIL AND PHONE NUMBER.

DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 12, 1996, LETTER FROM MAXIME TOSCANINO TO LAMBROS AND ORREN HERE IN PDF.

3. On September 8, 1995, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the U.S. District Court's record and findings of U.S. Judge Diana E. Murphy and stated, "Although a specific finding on the question whether Lambros had been tortured with American complicity would have been preferable, the state of the record obviates the need for remand. First, as discussed below, Lambros' testimony is UNRELIABLE because he PERJURED HIMSELF in other regards at trial, and it is also FANTASTIC. (For instance, Lambros maintains that he was held in the same Brazilian cell where the mistreatment alleged in United States vs. TOSCANINO, 500 F.2d 267 (2nd Cir. 1974), occurred, AND EVEN ASSERTS THAT HE MET TOSCANINO THERE.)" See, U.S. vs. LAMBROS, 65 F.3d 698, 701 (8th Cir. 1995)

4. JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS AND FRANCISCO TOSCANINO SPENT OVER FOUR (4) MONTHS TOGETHER AT THE FEDERAL POLICE STATION IN BRASILIA, BRAZIL IN 1991, INCLUDING OCTOBER 20, 1991. IN FACT, THE REPORTERS WHO INTERVIEWED TOSCANINO ALSO TOOK PICTURES OF LAMBROS IN 1991. THEREFORE, LAMBROS' TESTIMONY TO THE DISTRICT COURT, JUDGE DIANA E. MURPHY, WAS NOT UNRELIABLE OR FANTASTIC. The government of Brazil, United States Department of State, and the U.S. Department of Justice lied to the fact that I was jailed with Francisco Toscanino and my torture. U.S. Department of State General Counsel MARGARET MURPHY refused to obey Judge Murphys' SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY at Lambros' trial. General Counsel Margaret Murphy knew FRANCISCO TOSCANINO was being held with Lambros and visited Lambros several times at the Federal Police Station in Brasilia, Brazil as to Lambros' torture within the facility.

5. March 6, 1996, letter from Lambros to Senator Jesse Helms, Senator Rod Grams, Fernando Henrique Cardoso, Senator Nancy Landon Kassebaum, Senator Paul Wellstone, Dr. Antony C. Sutton, Editor of the Phoenix Letter, Francesco TOSCANINO, and Attorney Julio Cardella, Campinas-Sao Paulo, Brazil (TOSCANINO'S ATTORNEY). Lambros' March 6, 1996 letter requests a "SENATE INQUIRY AS TO TORTURE OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS AND OFFERS PROOF THAT FRANCESCO TOSCANINO WAS BEING HELD IN THE SAME BRAZILIAN POLICE DETENTION STATION AS JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS." Senator Jesse Helms responded to Lambros on May 20, 1996 stating "I contacted the proper authorities of the Bureau of Prisons and in doing so, I have requested their careful attention and consideration of the situation." No other action was taken by Senator Jesse Helms. None of the other persons named responded except the TOSCANINO FAMILY. This document is six (6) pages in total with exhibits and being offered in PDF FORMAT. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD MARCH 6, 1996 LETTER OFFERING PROOF TOSCANINO WAS HELD WITH LAMBROS IN BRASILIA, BRAZIL IN 1991 HERE IN PDF.

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LIONS CLUBS

ARGENTINA

BRAZIL'S MILITARY

CHUBB GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES

June 22, 1996 letter from Lambros to Chubb Insurance Companies relating his torture n Brazil and warning about the threat to persons, especially company executives, traveling and working in Brazil.
July 20, 1996 follow-up letter from Lambros to Chubb Insurance Companies transmitting more evidence and information about torture in Brazil.

BUILDING SHAREHOLDER PRESSURE TO BOYCOTT

June 22, 1996 letter from Lambros to an Analyst at Franklin Research & Development seeking assistance and information in organizing shareholder pressure on companies doing business in Brazil.
June 22, 1996 follow-up letter from Lambros to an Analyst at Franklin Research & Development transmitting additional information to Franklin regarding Lambros's activities.
BRAZIL'S CHIEF OF STATE AND CABINET MEMBERS. May 22, 2012 list of Brazil's chief of state and cabinet members as offered by the U.S. Government's CIA. You may obtain the current list by surfing to https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/world-leaders-1/world-leaders-b/brazil.html and clicking on the BRAZIL link.
Chiefs of State and Cabinet Members of Foreign Governments
FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL

As of May 22, 2012

COUNTRY STUDIES FROM THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. This is only a LINK to the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS COUNTRY STUDIES web site that contains reports on over 100 countries, including BRAZIL. To find what you need, browse the table of contents for BRAZIL, or search for a particular word or words in the entry for one country, BRAZIL, or a combination of countries. This database covers everything from history and business to government and NATIONAL SECURITY. (http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/cshome.html)
EGG AND YOLK BRAZILIAN POLITICIANS. Boycott Brazil supporters can vent there immediate feelings against Brazilian politicians, celebrities, and other factions within Brazil with virtual eggs. Visit www.ovoneles.com.br by clicking here and voice your EGG AND YOLK as to the torture of John Gregory Lambros and your support of the BOYCOTT OF BRAZIL. You may also email death-like ripper flatulents (a.k.a. FARTS) to Brazilian politicians by visiting Create-a-fart by clicking here www.createafart.com
BRAZILIAN COMPANIES THAT TRADE ON U.S. STOCK EXCHANGES (ADR'S)
November 2011 list of Brazilian publicly traded corporations that ALSO trade legally with the U.S. market. The following list may be updated by going to the BANK OF NEW YORK'S WEB SITE that offers a listing of every foreign company that trades in the U.S. and links to research reports, organizations and STOCK EXCHANGES AROUND THE WORLD: www.bankofny.com/adr/ J.P. Morgan & Co. also runs a web site that offers a variety of news, financial data and research tools on the following Brazilian companies, that will assist you in notifying everyone that does business with those companies as to the torture of John Gregory Lambros. www.adr.com

• Bombril-Cirio
• AmBev (ABV)
• Banco Bradesco (BBD)
• Banco Santander Brasil (BSBR)
• Brasil Telecom (BTM)
• Brasil Telecom Participacoes (BRP)
• Braskem (BAK)
• Brasil Foods (BRFS)
• Centrais Eletricas Brasileiras-Eletrobras (EBR)
• Comp. Paranaense de Energia (ELP)
• Companhia Brasileira de Distribuicao (CBD)
• Companhia Energetica de Minas Gerais (CIG)
• Companhia Siderurgica Nacional (SID)
• CPFL Energia CPL
• Embraer (ERJ)
• Fibria Celulose (FBR)
• Gafisa   (GFA)
• Gerdau (GGB)
• Gol Linhas Aereas Inteligentes (GOL)
• Itau Unibanco Holding (ITUB)
• Net Servicos de Comunicacao (NETC)
• Petroleo Brasileiro (PBR)
• Sadia (SDA)
• Tele Norte Leste (TNE)
• Telecomunicacoes de Sao Paulo (TSP)
• TIM Participacoes (TSU)
• Ultrapar (UGP)
• Vale (VALE)
• Vivo Participacoes (VIV)

CONTACT STOCK EXCHANGES GLOBALLY AS TO THE BOYCOTT OF BRAZIL.
Please take a few minutes and help spread the word globally to publicly traded companies and stock exchanges by researching these sites. Most exchanges have home pages and most offer an English-language version - though frequently you'll have to hunt for the link, this is also true for non- English speaking foreign companies:

a. Global Securities Information, a Washington, D.C., firm runs a site that provides links to just about every known stock exchange. Visit: www.gsionline.com/exchange.htm

b. IntlTrader.com provides links to non-U.S. Corporate web sites. The Winter Park, Florida online broker allows U.S. residents to trade in 32 foreign markets, and to do research on companies in many more. IntlTrader also supplies clients and GUESTS with access to research compiled by Wright Investors' Service, SUCH AS THE COMPANY AND ITS COMPETITORS - A USEFUL TOOL. Visit: IntlTrader.com

C. Globeshare.com, New York, provides country-specific data on company's, foreign-exchange rates and individual-company research published by a variety of foreign brokerage firms. (Some of this research is dated.) The information is available to clients and NON-CLIENTS who register at the site. Visit: Globeshare.com

d. Web sites for overseas brokers can be located at: www.globalinvestor.com

e. Local newspapers across the globe, many of which report, in English, on local companies and investment/boycott ideas, may be accessed from links from www.onlinenewspapers.com

f. If you need to locate the specific BRAZILIAN COMPANY you are BOYCOTTING and information on the city or town the Brazilian company is located within, visit MSN ENCARTA: GEOGRAPHY at encarta.msn.com/category/geography.asp or NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC: MAPS & GEOGRAPHY at www.nationalgeographic.com/maps

SELECTIVE PURCHASING ORDINANCES

August 13, 1998 MEMORANDUM from LAMBROS to all supporters of BOYCOTT BRAZIL regarding SELECTIVE PURCHASING ORDINANCES.
BOYCOTT BRAZIL is requesting your assistance in contacting PURCHASING AGENTS,
state and municipalities, to adopt "SELECTIVE PURCHASING ORDINANCES."

: www.PetitionOnline.com/jlambros/petition.html

IMPEACHMENT PETITIONS TO FIGHT CORRUPT BRAZILIAN OFFICIALS

LOCAL MARIJUANA ACTIVISTS USE THREAT OF IMPEACHMENT TO EDUCATE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS. Marijuana advocate Roger Christie lead local activists in Hawaii County (the State's Big Island) in the filing of impeachment petitions against Mayor Stephen Yamashiro and the council members over its support of Green Harvest, the $265,000.00 DEA drug enforcement grant to eradicate cultivated marijuana plants. The activists effectively overturned the council's earlier 5-4 vote approving the grant. Under the Hawaii County Charter, officials must pay their expenses to fight IMPEACHMENT PETITIONS. Worried about that prospect, before voting narrowly to receive the DEA grant, the council added language calling for some of the grant to be used to provide "IMPEACHMENT INSURANCE." THEY COULDN'T FIND ANY INSURERS, AND WITHOUT THE INSURANCE, THE GRANT WENT UNSPENT. This story, "Hawaii Inches Forward on Medical Marijuana, Rejects DEA Eradication Funds," may be accessed within the Drug Reform Coordination Network (DRCNet.org) past issues at: www.drcnet.org/wol/158.html#hawaiiaction

IMPEACHMENT OF PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: I am attaching pages 657, 658, and 659 from the AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE 2d, 63C, PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES, Sections 218 thru 222, which offers an excellent overview on the impeachment of public officers and employees in the United States, as of 1997. CLICK HERE to view these pages in PDF format. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD THE IMPEACHMENT DOCUMENT HERE IN PDF.

THE TWENTY (20) TOP TECH "PRODUCT BRANDS" PERCEIVED By BRAZILIAN INTERNET USERS

Boycott Brazil is offering supporters the results of the annual "ImagePower brand survey" from international image consultancy Landor Associates, as to the staying power of 250 Tech-related brands in Brazil. The following list of vendors should be notified as the current BOYCOTT OF BRAZIL and requested to contact Brazilian Government Officials as to the torture and denial of due process to John Gregory Lambros: Disney; Sony; Brastemp; Napster; Nokia; Pentium; MP3; Microsoft; Philips; Linux; Motorola; AltaVista; Apple; HP; Kodak; Xerox; PlayStation; Time Warner; Internet Explorer; and Intel.

THE $64,000.00 QUESTION!!!!!!!

WHY HASN'T BRAZIL OR ANY OF ITS' CITIZENS OR CORPORATIONS SUED JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS AND/OR BOYCOTT BRAZIL FOR ALLEGING FALSE STATEMENTS OF FACT IN A COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING ABOUT BRAZIL AND ITS JUSTICE SYSTEM, IN VIOLATION OF 43 OF THE LANHAM ACT????????

John Gregory Lambros is requesting the citizens and corporations of BRAZIL to bring legal action and injunctions against Lambros for the alleged falsity of statements of fact that appear within the BOYCOTT BRAZIL Web Site:

vww.brazilboycott.org

as the Boycott Brazil web site is material, in that it is intended to influence the purchasing decisions of every citizen globally, thus injury to the citizens and corporations of Brazil.

LAMBROS is requesting the citizens and corporations of Brazil to review the ELEMENTS of the LANHAM ACT 43(a), codified at Title 15 U.S.C. 1125(a), as to false advertising claims: (1) a false statement of fact by the defendant in a commercial advertisement about its own or another's product; (2) the statement actually deceived or has the tendency to deceive a substantial segment of its audience; (3) the deception is material, in that it is likely to influence the purchasing decision; (4) the defendant caused its false statement to enter interstate commerce; and (5) the plaintiff has been or is likely to be injured as a result of the false statement, either by direct diversion of sales from itself to defendant or by a lessening of the goodwill associated with its products. To demonstrate falsity within the meaning of the Lanham Act, a plaintiff may show that the statement was literally false, either on its face or by necessary implication, or that the statement was literally true but likely to mislead or confuse consumers. See, SOUTHLAND SOD FARMS vs. STOVER SEED CO., 108 F.3d 1134, 1139 (9th Cir. 1997).

BOYCOTT BRAZIL supporters support all statements of fact within the Boycott Brazil web site and intend to support the boycott of all Brazilian products until Brazil offers an AFFIDAVIT OF FACT as to all issues within the Boycott Brazil web site.

Global citizens are drawing adverse inference from Brazil's silence. It is well established that in a criminal trial a judge or prosecutor may not suggest that the jury draw an adverse inference from a defendant's failure to testify. GRIFFIN vs. CALIFORNIA, 380 U.S. 609, 614-15 (1965). In civil proceedings, however, the Fifth Amendment does not forbid fact finders from drawing adverse inferences against a party who refuses to testify. BAXTER vs. PALMIGIANO, 425 U.S. 308, 318-20 (1976); LEFKOWITZ vs. CUNNINGHAM, 431 U.S. 801, 808 n.5 (1977).

BRAZIL IMPORTS ELECTRICITY! WHY?????

1. Brazil is in the top five countries importing electricity. WHY?????? The attached article from WIRED MAGAZINE, September 2003, pages 52 and 53 entitled "POWER UP/1" states Brazil currently produces 342.3 billion kilowatt hours of electricity and over ninety (90%) is produced from hydr. The WIRED MAGAZINE article is being offered in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD "POWER UP!" ARTICLE, HERE IN PDF

BRAZIL RESISTS PLAN TO ALLOW SPOT INSPECTION OF NUCLEAR SITE. WHY???

December 28, 2003, Larry Rohter, New York Times, reported that Brazilian Minister of Science and Technology, ROBERTO AMARAL, stated in an interview that "It is necessary to be worried about what goes on out there, not here." After years of resistance, Brazil adhered to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty in 1997 and has since permitted LIMITED, CONTROLLED VISITS to its nuclear facilities. But it has refused to approve an additional protocol that authorizes spot inspections. During Brazil's military dictatorship, from.1964 to 1985, the government clandestinely pursued a nuclear weapons program. In 1981, Brazil and IRAQ signed a nuclear cooperation agreement that, according to an IAEA report issued last year, led the government to ship 26.7 tons of uranium dioxide to BAGHDAD. The New York Times article is being offered from the December 28, 2003, Star Tribune, Page A19, in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD ARTICLE ON BRAZIL RESISTING INSPECTION OF NUCLEAR SITE HERE IN PDF.

BRAZIL VS. MONSANTO

Thirty-five (35) Brazilian exporters of SOYBEANS, accounting for 95% of Brazil's soy shipments, will take on MONSANTO if they try to stop ships hauling illegal Roundup Ready soybeans derived from seeds smuggled from Argentina and Paraguay. Monsanto has no PATENT for for Roundup Ready in China, Brazil's main soy market, which accounts for around a third of bean exports. The article, "BRAZIL v. MONSANTO" appeared in the November 2003, edition of SMALL FARM TODAY, Page 13. This article is being offered in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD "BRAZIL vs. MONSANTO" ARTICLE HERE IN PDF.

BIRD FLU ROOSTING IN BRAZIL??? WAKE-UP BRAZIL!!!!!

1. March 20, 2006: Boycott Brazil is starting to receive reports that Brazilian Government Officials are withholding information as to the deadly strain of avian influenza, known as the H5Nl virus, is emerging in Brazil. In fact, Nancy Shute reported in the March 13, 2006, U.S. News & World Report, that a stray CAT in Germany died of bird flu and at least 94 people worldwide have died from H5NI. Id. at 13. Across Europe, demand for poultry has plummeted as the virus has spread westward. In Greece, poultry consumption has dropped 75 percent since H5NI was reported last month. In France, where bird flu has infected TURKEYS on commercial farms, farmers began vaccinating DUCKS AND GEESE. The U.S. Government announced that it had ORDERED 14 MILLION COURSES OF ANTIVIRAL DRUGS TO ADD TO THE 5.5 MILLION ALREADY STOCKPILED. THE FEDS WANT ENOUGH ANTIVIRAL TO TREAT 25 PERCENT OF THE POPULATION AGAINST A PANDEMIC FLU STRAIN.

2. March 21, 2006: BRAZIL WHY HAVEN'T YOU ORDERED ANTIVIRAL DRUGS FOR THE POPULATION OF BRAZIL AGAINST A PANDEMIC FLU STRAIN?????????

"TIP BOX"

If you would like to make a donation for the updating, promotion, and legal reserch of the BOYCOTT BRAZIL ORGANIZATION web site, please click the Tip Box for instructions on to make a donation. Thank you.

Support Boycott Brazil by shopping at Amazon.com!
Click the logo to shop

In Association with Amazon.com

POST FREE CLASSIFIED ADS, BUSINESS DIRECTORY LISTING AND YELLOW PAGE LISTING FOR YOUR BUSINESS - WITHIN 50 COUNTRIES. SEARCHING FOR A SPECIAL ITEM? SEARCH OVER 35 MILLION CLASSIFIED ADS WITH OVER 500,000 NEW ADS DAILY!!! Visite: www.NoPayClassifieds.com.

Buy tickets and make reservations at the Internet's largest travel site!

: www.PetitionOnline.com/jlambros/petition.html

LEGAL DOCUMENTS AND RELATED MATERIALS

PLEA NEGOTIATIONS - THE RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL DURING A PLEA OFFER

March 21, 2012: The U.S. Supreme Court held in two (2) decisions as to the right of effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations. See, MISSOURI vs. FRYE, No. 10-444; and LAFLER vs. COOPER, No. 10-209. Both decisions help John G. Lambros, as the U.S. Attorney and Lambros' attorney INCORRECTLY advised Lambros that the ONLY SENTENCE HE COULD RECEIVE WAS A "MANDATORY LIFE TERM OF IMPRISONMENT WITHOUT PAROLE". Lambros went to trial and received a sentence of "MANDATORY LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE". On September 8, 1995, The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit VACATED Count One (1) of his sentence - "MANDATORY LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE" - as the sentence was illegal during the time of the conspiracy. See, U.S. vs. LAMBROS, 65 F.3d 698 (8th Cir. 1995).

To help educate those persons following my legal proceedings, I'm offering the following information to support the resentencing of Lambros by VACATING HIS CONVICTION AND REQUIRE THE U.S. ATTORNEY TO REOFFER THE PLEA DEAL:

1. April 11, 2012: Lambros' overview of facts that occurred within U.S. vs. LAMBROS, Docket No. Cr.-4-89-82(05), U.S. Federal Court for the District of Minnesota. This document is four (4) pages in length with no exhibits. THIS DOCUMENT IS IN PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD APRIL 11, 2012, OVERVIEW OF LAMBROS' "PLEA AGREEMENT", HERE IN PDF.

2. April 14, 2012: QUESTION PRESENTED -- IS JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS ENTITLED TO A SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE 28 U.S.C. 2255 MOTION DUE TO "A NEW RULE OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW", BASED ON - LAFLER vs. COOPER, No. 10-209 and MISSOURI vs. FRYE No. 10-444? This document is two (2) pages in length with three (3) pages of exhibits, a total of five (5) pages. THIS DOCUMENT IS IN PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD APRIL 14, 2012, ADDENDUM TO APRIL 11, 2012 OVERVIEW OF "PLEA AGREEMENT", HERE IN PDF.

3. NOVEMBER 16, 1992 and NOVEMBER 17, 1992: On November 16, 1992, U.S. Attorney Heffelfinger and Assistant U.S. Attorney Peterson mailed the government's written PLEA AGREEMENT to Lambros' Attorney Charles W. Faulkner. The plea agreement stated on page two (2) that the "Conviction on the Count I charge, however, would carry a "MANDATORY TERM OF IMPRISONMENT OF LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE..." The November 17, 1992, letter from Attorney Faulkner to John Lambros restates that Count One (1) carries a "MANDATORY LIFE COUNT". This document is four (7) pages in length. THIS DOCUMENT IS IN PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 16, 1992 and NOVEMBER 17, 1992 LETTERS AND "PLEA AGREEMENT", HERE IN PDF

4. FEBRUARY 10, 1997: This is the first seven pages of the transcripts from John Lambros' RESENTENCING HEARING before Judge Robert G. Renner in USA vs. JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS, Criminal No. 4-89-82(05). The Court offers a brief overview as to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals vacating Lambros' MANDATORY LIFE SENTENCE WITHOUT PAROLE. Also, what is important is the fact the Court ILLEGALLY CONVERTED LAMBROS' PRO SE FEDERAL RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 33 MOTIONS INTO TITLE 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2255 MOTIONS AND DENIED SAME. Therefore, Lambros was not able to file any INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL CLAIMS THAT CAN ONLY BE PRESENTED WITHIN TITLE 28 U.S.C. 2255 MOTIONS. Judge Renner was the U.S. Attorney in 1975 and signed a federal indictment that listed Lambros as a defendant. Most people think Judge Renner should of RECUSED HIMSELF FROM LAMBROS' RESENTENCING. This document is seven (7) pages in length. THIS DOCUMENT IS IN PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 10, 1997, RESENTENCING HEARING, HERE IN PDF.

5. For an excellent overview of the U.S. SUPREME COURT RULES OF HOW THEY DECIDE IF A LEGAL DECISION IS TO BE APPLIED RETROACTIVE TO CASES ON COLLATERAL REVIEW - IN ORDER FOR A COURT OF APPEALS TO GRANT LAMBROS PERMISSION TO FILE HIS SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE 2255 - PLEASE REVIEW:

IN RE: CARNELL TURNER, 267 F.3d 225 (3rd Cir. 2001);

IN RE: OLOPADE, 403 F.3d 159, 162-164 (3rd Cir.2005).

6. LAMBROS FILES MOTION WITH COURT ON JUNE 8, 2012

Lambros filed the following motion with the U.S. District Court in Minnesota on June 8, 2012, "MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255(f)(3) and 2255(h)(2) BY A PRISONER IN FEDERAL CUSTODY AND MEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW IN SUPPORT OF SAME. Dated: June 8, 2012. This document is 26 pages in length with an additional 31 pages of exhibits and 1 page cover letter to the Clerk of the Court - 58 pages total. THIS DOCUMENT IS IN PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD JUNE 8, 2012 MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255(f)(3) AND I 2255(h)(2), HERE IN PDF.

7. "UNITED STATES RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT LAMBROS' APPLICATION TO FILE SUCCESSIVE SECTION 2255 HABEAS PETITION", DATED: July 23, 2012.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann M. Anaya and U.S. Attorney B. Todd Jones respond to John Lambros June 8, 2012 "MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255(f)(3) and 2255(h)(2) BY A PRISONER IN FEDERAL CUSTODY." Please note that the District Court Clerk for the District of Minnesota did not file Lambros' motion and mailed it directly to the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, Case No. 12-2427. The government's motion is ten (10) pages and nineteen (19) pages of exhibit - 29 pages total. This document is in PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD JULY 23, 2012 GOVERNMENT RESPONSE MOTION TO LAMBROS' 5 2255, HERE IN PDF.

8. August 13, 2012 - "MOVANT LAMBROS' RESPONSE TO "UNITED STATES RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION TO FILE SUCCESSIVE SECTION 2255 HABEAS PETITION" - DATED: July 23, 2012."

Lambros response to the government's response and requests that United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit to proceed in this action, as the government has ADMITTED TO ALL THE ALLEGATIONS WITHIN LAMBROS' 2255, due to violations of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 10(b) and Rule 8(b) and Rule 8(d). THIS IS AN EXCELLENT MOTION THAT HIGHLIGHTS FACTS COVERED-UP BY THE U.S. Department of State and the Government's use of the incorrect criminal statutes against Lambros. This motion is 19 pages in length with another 1 page cover letter and 15 pages of exhibits - 35 pages total. This document is in PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD AUGUST 13, 2012 - LAMBROS' RESPONSE TO U.S. GOVERNMENTS RESPONSE IN JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DOCKET NO. 12-2427, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

9. October 17, 2012 - "SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO INFORM COURT OF NEW RELEVANT PUBLISHED HOLDING THAT CONTAINS PERSUASIVE VALUE ON THE ONLY ISSUE IN THIS ACTION - U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APPLY LAFLER vs. COOPER, 132 S. Ct. 1376 (2012) AND MISSOURI vs. FRYE, 132 S. Ct. 1399 (2012) RETROACTIVELY."

Lambros informs the Eighth Circuit of the September 28, 2012, OPINION in TYRONE W. MILES vs. MICHAEL MARTEL, WARDEN, No. 10-15633, by Circuit Judge Betty B. Fletcher of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, who applied the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions in LAFLER vs. COOPER and MISSOURI vs. FRYE, RETROACTIVELY. "By applying this holding in LAFLER, a habeas petition subject to AEDPA, the Court necessarily implied that this holding applies to habeas petitioners WHOSE CASES ARE ALREADY FINAL ON DIRECT REVIEW; i.e. THAT THE HOLDING APPLIES RETROACTIVELY." This is a short motion with an exhibit containing portions of MILES vs. MARTEL, as to the application of RETROACTIVE APPLICATION. The motion is 4 pages with cover letter and 4 pages of exhibits - 8 pages total. This document is in PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 17, 2012 - LAMBROS' "SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION" AS TO RETROACTIVITY ISSUE WITHIN 2255 - HERE IN PDF.

10. November 5, 2012 - "MOTION FOR RECUSAL OF CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE DIANA MURPHY FROM THE JUDGMENT IN THIS ABOVE-ENTITLED ACTION PURSUANT TO TITLE 28 U.S.C. 9 455 et. al."

11. NOVEMBER 5, 2012 - "PETITION FOR REHEARING (FRAP 40) WITH SUGGESTION FOR PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (FRAP 35)".

Lambros files the above two motion due to the October 24, 2012 denial of his request to file a successive habeas application in the district court. Please note that Judge Diana Murphy denied Lambros' request which is not legal, as she was the District Court Judge that ORIGINALLY CONDUCTED THE TRIAL AND SENTENCING OF LAMBROS IN THIS ACTION. A JUDGE CANNOT JUDGE HIS OR HER OWN WORK! Lambros has requested that the panel of judges vacate the order and assign a new three judge panel to review Lambros' request. Also, of interest is the fact the panel of judges DID NOT offer an opinion within the denial, when the law requires the court to state the REASONS FOR DENIAL EITHER BY INFORMAL MEMORANDUM, BY RECITAL IN AN ORDER, OR BY FINDINGS. The above motions are thirteen (13) pages total, which includes a cover letter to the court and two pages of exhibits. This document is in PDF FORMAT. JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. USA, No. 12-2427 (8th Circuit Court of Appeals)

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 5, 2012 - LAMBROS' "MOTION FOR RECUSAL" AND "PETITION FOR REHEARING' - HERE IN PDF.

12. OCTOBER 24, 2012 - LAMBROS' "PETITION FOR SUCCESSIVE 5 2255" IS DENIED."

Circuit Court Judges Diana Murphy, SMITH and BENTON denied Lambros successive 2255 without offering the reasons for denial either by informal memorandum, by recital in an order, or by findings - as required by law. See, Title 28 U.S.C. 2255 "....... DETERMINE THE ISSUES AND MAKE FINDINGS OF FACT AND WITH RESPECT THERETO. ..." JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. USA, No. 12-2427.

DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 24, 2012 - "JUDGMENT" BY U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR EIGHTH CIRCUIT - HERE IN PDF.

13. NOVEMBER 9, 2012 - LETTER FROM CLERK OF EIGHTH CIRCUIT - NO REHEARING

Michael Gans, Clerk for the Eighth Circuit states that Lambros' petition for rehearing and/or rehearing enbanc is denied, as law does not allow same. LAMBROS vs. USA, No. 12-2427.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 9, 2012 LETTER FROM CLERK OF COURT TO LAMBROS - HERE IN PDF.

14. NOVEMBER 29, 2012 - LAMBROS' MOTION FOR RECUSAL IS DENIED

The Eighth Circuit denies Lambros' "MOTION FOR RECUSAL OF JUDGE DIANA MURPHY". LAMBROS vs. USA, No. 12-2427.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 29, 2012 "ORDER!' DENYING LAMBROS MOTION FOR RECUSAL - HERE IN PDF.

15. LAMBROS ASKS FEDERAL COURT WITHIN THE DISTRICT HE IS INCARCERATED TO MAKE A FINDING OF FACT AND CONCLUSION OF LAW DUE TO THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF "PEALS REFUSAL TO OFFER SAME! LAMBROS FILES A "WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA!' WHICH ALLOWS THE COURT TO RULE ON SAME. See. U.S.A. vs. MILLER, 599 F.3d 484, 487-488 (5th Cir. 2010) (Collecting Cases).

FEBRUARY 26, 2013 - PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN FEDERAL CUSTODY - Title 28 U.S.C. 2241; AND/OR "WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA" - under the "All Writs Act", Title 28 U.S.C. 1651(a). JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. CLAUDE MAYE, Warden for U.S. Penitentiary Leavenworth, Civil Docket No. 5:13-cv-3034-RDR, U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. This motion is twenty (20) pages in length which includes the cover letter. Also attached is the "INDEX AND EXHIBITS" MOTION which is three (3) pages in length NOT INCLUDING THE EXHIBITS. Please note that the exhibits are all available in the above postings. THIS MOTION WAS FILED DUE TO THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS REFUSING TO MAKE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATE CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AS REQUIRED BY LAW. Therefore, Lambros' 28 U.S.C. 2255 was "INADEQUATE AND/OR INEFFECTIVE" thus offering Lambros a remedy of law within the federal court where he is incarcerated. This document is a total of twenty three (23) pages in PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 26, 2013 - LAMBROS' "WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS" and/or "WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA" - HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

16. MAY 17, 2013: U.S. District Judge RICHARD D. ROGERS response to Lambros' February 26, 2013, PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS and/or WRIT OF QUERELA. Judge Rogers "MEMORANDUM AND ORDER" is 17 pages in length. Of interest is the fact that Judge Rogers refuses to rule on Lambros' WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA AND DISMISSES ONLY ON THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS?? Judge Rogers never mentioned the WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA ONE TIM IN HIS RESPONSE! See, LAMBROS vs. CLAUDE MAYE, WARDEN, Civil Docket No. 13-3034-RDR, U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. This document is a total of eighteen (18) pages in PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD MAY 17, 2013 RESPONSE FROM JUDGE ROGERS - HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

17. JUNE 5, 2013: Lambros files "MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT OF THIS COURT'S "MEMORANDUM AND ORDER" FILED MAY 17, 2013, PURSUANT TO RULE 59(e) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE." Lambros admits with the court that it does not have jurisdiction under the WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Lambros offers case law proving that Judge Rogers DOES HAVE JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO THE "WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA, UNDER THE ALL WRITS ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1651(a)." U.S. vs. MORGAN, 346 U.S. 502, 511-512 (1954); U.S. vs. THODY, 460 Fed. Appx. 776 (10th Cir. 2012). This motion is twenty-two (22) pages in length including cover letter and two pages of exhibits in PDF FORMAT. See, LAMBROS vs. MAYE, Warden, Civil Docket No. 13-3034RDR, U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas.

DOWNLOAD JUNE 5, 2013 - MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 59(e) - HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

18. JULY 1, 2013: U.S. District Court Judge RICHARD D. ROGERS responses to Lambros' RULE 59(e) with an "ORDER" that states Lambros "fails to demonstrate the existence of any extraordinary circumstances that would justify a decision to alter or amend the judgment dismissing this action." This "ORDER" is ten (10) pages in length in PDF FORMAT. See, LAMBROS vs. MAYE, Docket No. 13-3034-RDR, U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas.

DOWNLOAD JULY 1, 2013 "ORDER!' FROM JUDGE ROGERS - HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

19. AUGUST 28, 2013: Lambros appeals the denial of his WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Please note that Lambros raises four (4) issues with the 10th Circuit as to his illegal sentence of MANDATORY LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE on Count One (1) - which qualifies as both "A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE" and "ACTUAL INNOCENCE EXCEPTION", within LAFLER vs. COOPER, 132 S.Ct. 1376 (2012) and MISSOURI vs. FRYE, 132 S.Ct. 1399 (2012). This combined opening brief and application for a certificate of appealability is a total of thirty-five (35) pages including a cover-letter and 3 pages of exhibits. See, JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. CLAUDE MAYE, WARDEN, Docket No. 13-3159 (10th Cir. Aug. 2013).

DOWNLOAD AUGUST 28, 2013 - OPENING BRIEF "APPEAL" OF LAMBROS TO TENTH CIRCUIT HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

20. OCTOBER 4, 2013: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denies Lambros' WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA. See, JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. CLAUDE MAYE, No. 13-3159. This ORDER AND JUDGMENT IS THREE (3) PAGES.

DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 4, 2013 "ORDER AND JUDGMENT" BY TENTH CIRCUIT - HERE IN PDF.

20. DECEMBER 9, 2013: Lambros files "PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI" as to October 4, 2013 "ORDER AND JUDGMENT" by U.S. Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit that affirmed the district court's order in dismissal of WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA. Lambros' writ of certiorari offers an excellent overview as to the illegal sentencing information the government used within two (2) plea agreements it offered Lambros, in violation of the considerations set out by the Supreme Court in MISSOURI vs. FRYE and LAFLER vs. COOPER. This motion is 38 pages in length with 52 pages of exhibits. Total pages of document is 102 pages in PDF format. See LAMBROS vs. CLAUDE MAY, No. 13-7980.

DOWNLOAD DECEMBER 9, 2013 "WRIT OF CERTIORARI" - HERE IN PDF.

21. MARCH 3, 2014: Supreme Court DENIES Lambros' December 9, 2013, PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI. See, LAMBROS vs. CLAUDE MAY, Warden, No. 13-7980.

DOWNLOAD MARCH 3, 2014, DENTAL OF WRIT OF CRRTIORARI - HERE IN PDF
.


LAMBROS ATTACKS ILLEGAL CRIMINAL SENTENCES HE WAS INDICTED ON IN 1975 AND 1976:

1. MARCH 7, 2013: Lambros files "MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE MOTION TO VACATE UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255(f)(3) and 2255(h)(2), BY A PRISONER IN FEDERAL CUSTODY. This motion was filed due to the Supreme Court's two March 21, 2012 decisions that expanded the opportunities for defendants to overturn their convictions on the basis of POST-CONVICTION CLAIMS that their attorneys did an unreasonably poor job during PLEA NEGOTIATIONS - MISSOURI vs. FRYE, 132 S.Ct. 1399; and LAFLER vs. COOPER, 132 S.Ct. 1376 (2012). John Gregory Lambros was named as a defendant in the following two (2) indictments that are related, as the plea of guilty was entered at the same time on both indictments: a) INDICTMENT NO. 3-76-17, filed on March 24, 1976; b) INDICTMENT NO. 3-75-128, filed on February 23, 1976. EXHIBIT C is a copy of the ILLEGAL INDICTMENT in USA vs. LAMBROS, No. 3-76-17, pursuant to violations of Title 18 U.S.C. Sections 111 and 114 and the "JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER" for same. INDICTMENT 3-76-17 was illegal, as this crime MUST take place on FEDERAL LAND AND PROPERTY SUCH AS FEDERAL. COURTHOUSES AND MILITARY BASES. This crime allegedly took place at LAMBROS' house located within the city of St. Paul and/or RAMSEY COUNTY. See, Title 18 U.S.C. 114. See, pages 18 thru 22 for exact facts on same. This document is a total of 36 pages including a cover letter and 12 pages of exhibits in PDF FORMAT. Docket No. 13-1561.

DOWNLOAD MARCH 7, 2013 - SUCCESSIVE 2255 MOTION FOR LAMBROS' INDICTMENT M S IN 1975 AND 1976 - HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

2. MARCH 22, 2013: U.S. Attorney B. Todd Jones and Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann M. Anaya respond to Lambros' March 7, 2013 motion, "UNITED STATES RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION TO FILE SUCCESSIVE SECTION 2255 HABEAS PETITION." See, LAMBROS vs. U.S., Docket No. 13-1561, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. This document is a total of four (4) pages in PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD MARCH 22, 2013 - U.S. GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE TO LAMBROS SUCCESSIVE 2255 - HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

3. April 2, 2013: LAMBROS' RESPONSE TO 'U.S. RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION TO FILE SUCCESSIVE SECTION 2255 HABEAS PETITION.' Lambros brings the Court's attention to the fact that the U.S. Attorney's ADMITTED ALL FACTS WITHIN LAMBROS' MOTION, AS THEY DID NOT FOLLOW CIVIL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, RULE 8(b) and 8(d). See Page 2. LAMBROS vs. U.S., Docket No. 13-1561, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. This document is a total of eleven (11) pages including a cover letter in PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD APRIL 2, 2013 - LAMBROS' RESPONSE TO GOVERNMENT'S MARCH 22, 2013 MOTION - HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

JULY 30, 2013: "JUDGMENT" by Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals denying Lambros' petition to file a successive 2255 in the district court in INDICTMENTS No. 3-76-17 and 3-75-128 (1975 amd 1976). See, LAMBROS vs. USA, Docket No. 13-1561. This document is one page in PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD JULY 30, 2013 - JUDGMENT BY EIGHTH CIRCUIT - HERE IN PDF FORMAT.


THIS IS THE CIVIL RACKETEERING (RICO) AND NEGLIGENCE SUIT FILED BY JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS AGAINST HIS CORRUPT COURT-APPOINTED ATTORNEY THAT PROVES LAMBROS IS INNOCENT OF ALL CHARGES AND WAS TORTURED AND FORCED IMPLANTED WITH BRAIN CONTROL IMPLANTS IN BRAZIL. JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. CHARLES W. FAULKNER, sued as Estate/Will/Business Insurance of Deceased Attorney Charles W. Faulkner, Sheila Regan Faulkner, Faulkner & Faulkner, and John & Jane Does, Civil Number 98-1621 (DSD/JMM), United States District Court, District of Minnesota.

DOCKET SHEET- LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, et al., CIVIL NUMBER 98-1621. This docket sheet was downloaded from PACER Service Center, PO Box 780549, San Antoniao, Texas 78278-0549. Telephone number (800) 676-6756, E-mail: pacer@aottsd.uscourts.gov on the following date: April 27, 2000.
DOCKET SHEET- UNITED STATES vs. JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS, et al., U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, CRIMINAL FILE NUMBER CR-4-89-82(15). This is the criminal docket sheet that is being used as to the above CIVIL ACTION against Attorney Charles Faulkner, et al., therefore all filings within this docket sheet are EXHIBITS and EVIDENCE as to RICO violations and negligence against Attorney Faulkner et al. by John Gregory Lambros. This document is 18 total pages in length. YOUR MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE

DOWNLOAD THE ABOVE DOCKET SHEET DOCUMENT IN PDF

August 4, 1999 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by U.S. Magistrate Judge John M. Mason, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, that offers an excellent overview of the facts and procedural history in this case. Judge Mason states, "For the reasons set forth above, it is recommended that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or for summary judgment [Docket No. 47] be DENIED as presented.
November 15, 1999, ORDER by United States District Court Judge David S. Doty, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, that ADOPTS the August 4, 1999 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Mason after de novo review of the file and record by dismissal of defendants motion to dismiss or for summary judgment.
October 31, 2000, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by United States Magistrate Judge John M. Mason, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER. Please note that Magistrate Mason has not stated the complete facts within his finding of facts on page two (2), where he states LAMBROS was sentenced to a term of at least 360 months in jail. The report should state LAMBROS was sentenced to a MANDATORY LIFE SENTENCE WITHOUT PAROLE that was vacated by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. See, U.S. vs. LAMBROS, 65 F.3d 698 (8th Cir. 1995). Lambros' was then resentenced to thirty (30) years as per Article 75 of the Brazilian Criminal Code, which limits the maximum prison sentence to thirty (30) years in Brazil. See, STATE OF WASHINGTON vs. MARTIN SHAW PANG, 940 P.2d 1293 (Wash. 1997). The REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION is 15 pages with an APPENDIX of 2 pages. Total of 17 pages. (Judge Mason states on page 14, "There is no evidence that Plaintiff ever would have been offered a plea agreement which included an arrangement for the REMOVAL OF BRAIN CONTROL IMPLANTS.")
February 13, 2001, (Filed February 14, 2001) ORDER by United States District Court Judge David S. Doty, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER. Please note that Judge Doty adopts the October 31, 2000 REPORT & RECOMMENDATION and affirms the conclusion that the state court would likely extend its grant of immunity to FAULKNER in this action. Also the Court stated, "plaintiff has adduced no evidence upon which a rational fact-finder could conclude that defense counsel's conduct in any way prejudiced plaintiff's defense or that defendant's coerced witnesses to give false testimony in plaintiff's criminal case." With all respect to Judge Doty, Lambros believes that Judge Doty is currently experiencing alzheimer's and/ or has misplaced some of the above documents in this action. After reading this ORDER please go to LAMBROS' February 23, 2001, RULE 59(e) that responds to Judge Doty's theory in this ORDER. Thank you. This ORDER is a total of five (5) pages.
The Civil RICO suit against Charles W. Faulkner was initially started by giving NOTICE of ACT ION by a COMMERCIAL LIEN filed by Lambros. So as to assist the reader of this site in the theory used by Lambros, he is requesting that you review the following article by Alfred Adask, "COMMERCIAL LIEN STRATEGY, A PRESIDENTIAL OPINION." This article appeared in the AntiShyster Magazine, Volume 3, No. 1, Jan./Feb. 1993.
June 15, 1998 initial filing of Lambros' DECLARATORY JUDGMENT and/or COMPLAINT in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. This document includes the one page CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. EXHIBITS NOT INCLUDED.
June 15, 1998 REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS FROM DEFENDANT SHEILA REGAN FAULKNER, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621.
July 20, 1998 MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THIS DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ACTION/COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FRCP 15 (a), in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. EXHIBITS NOT INCLUDED.
July 28, 1998 REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS FROM: LAW OFFICE MANAGEMENT INC., SUITE 500, 701 FOURTH AVENUE SOUTH, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55415, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621.
July 28, 1998 REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS FROM: LARRY PEEBLES, c/o BURNETT REALITY, 13608 - 80TH CIRCLE, MAPLE GROVE, MINNESOTA 55369, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621.
August 13, 1998 REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS FROM: THE PARVUS COMPANY, 8403 COLESVILLE ROAD, SUITE 610, SILVER SPRINGS, MARYLAND 20910, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621.
August 20, 1998 SECOND MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THIS DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ACTION/COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FRCP 15 (a), in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. PARTIAL EXHIBITS INCLUDED.
August 22, 1998 REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS FROM: CYNTHIA COLLETT, PRESIDENT OF COLLETT ENTERPRISES, 6708 NORTH MONROE, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99208, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621.
August 24, 1998 REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS FROM: RICHARD STARK, PRESIDENT OF SmartAds AND STARK COMMUNICATIONS, 6094 PERIMETER LAKES DRIVE, DUBLIN, OHIO 43016, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621.
September 7, 1998 REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS FROM: SEITLIN & COMPANY, and Officers/Directors Richard Johnson, Stephen M. Jackman, and Barry Ladis, Suite 200, 2001 NW 107th Avenue, Miami, Florida 33172. (A Kidnap, ransom & Insurance Company), in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. Five (5 pages in length).
September 15, 1998 and September 17, 1998, MOTION BY PLAINTIFF FOR SUBSTITUTION OF PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES W. FAULKNER FOR DECEASED DEFENDANT CHARLES W. FAULKNER. [F.R.C.P. Rule 25 (a) (1)] (two (2) pages) and PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S ANSWER. (Eleven (11) pages), both documents served on September 18, 1998, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. Five (5 pages in length).
October 26, 1998 MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT ATTORNEY SHEILA REGAN FAULKNER TO ANSWER FIRST SET OF WRITTEN INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDED UNDER RULES 34(b), 37(a), and 69 (a), FRCP, FOR ORDER TO COMPEL. (four (4) pages. Attached to this document is copy of Lambros' September 1, 1998, PLAINTIFF LAMBROS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDED TO DEFENDANT ATTORNEY SHEILA REGAN FAULKNER. (Fifteen (15) pages), both documents served on October 27, 1998, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. Total pages twenty (20).

November 4, 1998 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ALTER THE PLEADINGS IN THIS MATTER AS PER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN M. MASON'S ORDER, DATED OCTOBER 15, 1998, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. Twenty five (25) pages in length.

November 5, 1998 MOTION BY PLAINTIFF FOR SUBSTITUTION OF PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES W. FAULKNER FOR DECEASED DEFENDANT CHARLES W. FAULKNER, [F.R.C.P. RULE 25 (a) (1)], in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. Four (4) pages total including Certificate of Service page.
November 27, 1998, Attorney Donna Rae Johnson's letter to the Clerk of the Court with copy to Lambros with the following enclosures: (1) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO AMEND ORDER OF 10/15/98, dated November 13, 1998; (2) Attorney Donna Rae Johnson's letter to Lambros, dated November 13, 1998; (3) Attorney Donna Rae Johnson's letter to Magistrate Judge John M. Mason, dated November 13, 1998; (4) Attorney Donna Rae Johnson's MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO AMEND ORDER DATED 10/15/98, dated November 25, 1998, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. Thirteen (13) total pages.
December 14, 1998, letter from Attorney Donna Rae Johnson to the Clerk of the Court and Lambros with copy of the following motions attached: (1) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS ET AL, dated December 14, 1998, two (2) pages; (2) MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS AND IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTIONS, dated December 12, 1998, nine (9) pages; (3) AFFIDAVIT OF SHEILA REGAN FAULKNER, dated December 14, 1998, four (4) pages; 4) DEFENDANT SHEILA REGAN FAULKNER'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES, dated December 14, 1998, nine (9) pages; (5) DEFENDANT SHEILA REGAN FAULKNER'S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS, dated December 14, 1998, ten (10) pages; in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. Total document pages within combined set of documents is 35 pages.
January 5, 1999, REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS FROM: JUDGE BALTASAR GARZON, National Court in Madrid, Spain, Audiencia National, Garcia Gutierrez, #1, Madrid, Spain 28004. Five (5) total pages without exhibits.
January 2, 1999, PLAINTIFF LAMBROS’ RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS: 1.) December 12, 1998, Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motions and in Support of Defendant’s Motions; 2.) December 14, 1998, Defendant’s motion to dismiss et al.; 3.) December 14, 198 Affidavit of Sheila Regan Faulkner; 4.) December 14, 1998, Defendant Sheila Regan Faulkner’s Response to Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions; 5.) December 14, 1998 Defendant Sheila Regan Faulkner’s Response to Plaintiff’s First Set of Interrogatories. Served on January 5, 1999, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. Total page fourteen (14) including Certificate of Service and NO EXHIBITS.
January 8, 1999, Plaintiff Lambros’ letter to Judge Mason and Attorney Donna Rae Johnson as to an overview of Title 18 U.S.C.A. 201(c)(2), in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. Total of two (2) pages.
January 26, 1999, ORDER and MEMORANDUM by Judge Mason in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. Total of four (4) pages.
January 26, 1999, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Judge Mason in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. Total of two (2) pages.
February 17, 1999, Plaintiff Lambros’ MOTION TO AMEND in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. Served on February 19, 1999. Total of five (5) pages including CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.
February 17, 1999, Plaintiff Lambros' AMENDED COMPLAINT in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. Served on February 19, 1999. Total of twenty seven (27) pages. NO EXHIBITS SCANNED.
March 26, 1999, ORDER by Judge Mason in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. Total of three (3) pages.
May 3, 1999, Plaintiff Lambros’ letter to Attorney Donna Rae Johnson and Attorney Donna Deborah Ellis as to Defendant Faulkner’s INSURER’S DUTY TO DEFEND, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. Total of two (2) pages.
May 11, 1999, Plaintiff Lambros’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (one page) and PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT, MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT AND REQUESTED ORDER DATED APRIL 26, 1999, (23 pages), in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. Total of twenty-five (25) pages including Certificate of Service. NO EXHIBITS SCANNED.
May 19, 1999, Plaintiff Lambros' “PART II (DELAYED FILING AS PER MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME) PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT, MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT AND REQUESTED ORDER DATED APRIL 26, 1999, (23 pages), in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. (Pages 24 thru 43). Total of twenty-one (21) pages including Certificate of Service page. NO EXHIBITS SCANNED.
August 13, 1999, Plaintiff Lambros’ motion “PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE MASON’S AUGUST 4, 1999, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS,” in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. Total of four (4) pages including Certificate of Service page.
September 4, 1999, Plaintiff Lambros’ motion “PLAINTIFF LAMBROS’ REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANTS ATTORNEYS UNDER A COMBINATION OF RULE 11 AND SECTION 1927,” in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621. Total of eleven (11) pages including Certificate of Service page. NO EXHIBITS SCANNED.
November 19, 1999, and November 20, 1999. PLAINTIFF LAMBROS' OBJECTION TO THE ORDER OF U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DAVID S. DOTY, DATED NOVEMBER 15, 1999, AS TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANTS' ATTORNEYS UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 11 AND 28 U.S.C. 1927 BEING DENIED. Total of one (1) page. Also, SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION AS TO PLAINTIFF LAMBROS' REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANTS ATTORNEYS UNDER A COMBINATION OF RULE 11 AND SECTION 1927. Total of four (4) pages. Combined total of both documents with CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE is six (6) pages. NO EXHIBITS SCANNED.
November 23, 1999. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO RESUME DISCOVERY AND/OR OTHER PRETRIAL ACTIVITIES. Total of two (2) pages including CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.
December 11, 1999. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION REQUESTING COURT TO COMPEL DEFENDANTS TO DISCLOSE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL INSURANCE COMPANIES THAT MAY HAVE LIABILITY FOR CLAIMS WITHIN THIS ACTION, SO PLAINTIFF MAY FILE ATTACHMENTS ON INSURANCE CONTRACTS. FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, RULE 64. Total of three (3) pages including CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.
December 30, 1999. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. Total of eight (8) pages including CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.
January 6, 2000. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR A RULING BY THIS COURT AS TO THE ADDITION OF NEW DEFENDANTS WITHIN THIS ACTION DUE TO AFFIDAVITS AND EXHIBITS INTRODUCED BY DEFENDANTS ON AUGUST 30, 1999, SO AS TO PRESERVE PLAINTIFF'S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS UNDER RES JUDICATA AND COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL, IN THIS ACTION. Total of eight (8) pages including CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. NO EXHIBITS SCANNED.
January 12, 2000, (RELEASED TO PUBLIC ON JULY 06, 2004) confidential letter from Lambros to Judge John M. Mason and David S. Doty in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, Civil No. 98-1621(DSD/JMM). This letter offers documents from Raymond H. Lavas, Technical consultant for Ted L. Gunderson and Associates, International Security Consulting and Investigation, Santa Monica, California and Dr. Antony C. Sutton, D.Sc., editor of the PHOENIX LETTER and author of over 25 books. Lambros believes the governments of Brazil and the United States have placed pressure on both individuals to keep quiet as to the documents I'm releasing within the letter. Neither Judge Mason or Doty have held evidentiary hearings to review information contained within the letters offered. The above letter is a total of twenty-seven (27) pages including exhibits and being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD JANUARY 12, 2000, LETTER FROM LAMBROS TO JUDGE MASON AMD JUDGE DOTY HERE IN PDF.

January 20, 2000. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO COURT'S ORDER DATED DECEMBER 22, 1999, REGARDING DISCOVERY AND EXPERT WITNESSES, SO COURT MAY ISSUE A PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AS PER RULE 26(A) (2) (A) AND (B). Total of twenty one (21) pages including CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. NO EXHIBITS SCANNED.
March 1, 2000, NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Attorney Gregory J. Stenmoe to represent John G. Lambros in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, et. al, Civil No. 98-1621. Total of one (1) page.
March 15, 2000, ORDER FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE by U.S. Magistrate Judge John M. Mason. Total of two (2) page.
March 16, 2000, Lambros' letter to Attorney Stenmoe (two (2) pages) and three attachments. (a) February 1, 2000, Plaintiff Lambros' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' SECOND MOTION FOR JUDGEMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT, AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT. Both dated January 19, 2000, (19 pages in length); (b) February 1, 2000, LEGAL CASES to support Lambros' right to effective assistance of counsel at plea bargaining in correctly advising Lambros of potential maximum sentence, (4 pages in length); (c) March 1, 2000, "PLAINTIFF LAMBROS REQUESTS LEAVE OF THE COURT TO AMEND THIS PLEADING TO ADD NEW CLAIM THAT RELATES BACK TO ORIGINAL COMPLAINT." Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 15(a), (5 pages in length). Total of 30 pages within all documents.
March 29, 2000, RULE 26(F) REPORT submitted to the Court by all attorneys in this action as to April 5, 2000 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Total of 7 pages.
April 5, 2000, ORDER by United States Magistrate Judge John M. Mason. Total of two (2) pages.
June 30, 2000, DEFENDANTS' (Faulkners') COMPREHENSIVE MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Total two (2) pages.
June 30, 2000, DEFENDANTS' (Faulkners') MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF COMPREHENSIVE MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Total of twenty five (25) pages.
June 29, 2000, AFFIDAVIT OF ATTORNEY JOSEPH S. FRIEDBERG, 250 Second Avenue South, Suite 205, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401. Attorney FRIEDBERG's AFFIDAVIT was submitted with Defendant FAULKNER's June 30, 2000, MOTION and MEMORANDUM in support of their request for dismissal and/or summary judgement. Please note that Attorney FRIEDBERG states that he is familiar with applicable standards for competency of criminal defense lawyers and is of the opinion Attorney FAULKNER's representation DID NOT fall below an objective standard of reasonableness for counsel in a criminal case. Lambros can only wonder how many times Attorney FRIEDBERG has MISINFORMED his criminal clients of the INCORRECT criminal sentence they could receive??? Please refer to LAMBROS' May 11, 1999, motion, "PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT, MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT AND REQUESTED ORDER DATED APRIL 26, 1999," pages 14, 15, 16, and 17, and YOU decide if you would hire Attorney Friedberg to represent you in a criminal or civil case. FRIEDBERG's AFFIDAVIT is a total of three (3) pages.
Also see CLAIM 17 within the August 3, 2000, AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS, paragraph 52 thru 60, pages 15 thru 17, where CHARLES FAULKNER ALLOWED the Court to offer jury instructions that DID NOT require proof of the ACTUAL AMOUNT OF THE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE that was part of the alleged transactions. The amount and/or quantity of a controlled substance is an ESSENTIAL ELEMENT of every drug offense and must be established beyond a REASONABLE DOUBT by the jury.
August 15, 2000, introduction letter from Briggs and Morgan to the Clerk of the Court as to the filing of the following motions, two (2) pages; August 15, 2000, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF A LEGAL EXPERT, two (2) pages; August 15, 2000, PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' COMPREHENSIVE MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, twenty-nine, (29) pages. 33 total pages.
August 3, 2000, AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS, seventeen (17) pages. NO EXHIBITS SCANNED.; August 7, 2000, AFFIDAVIT NUMBER TWO (2) OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS AS TO CORRECTIONS WITHIN AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS, DATED AUGUST 3, 2000, two (2) pages. Both the August 3, 2000 AFFIDAVITS were included with the August 15, 2000 filings by Briggs and Morgan to the Clerk of Court. 19 Total pages.
August 30, 2000, Defendant Faulkner's attorney's letter to the Clerk of the Court as to the filing of "DEFENDANTS' REPLY MEMORANDUM TO PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS OR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT. Total of one (1) page. The attached (undated) "DEFENDANTS' REPLY MEMORANDUM TO PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS OR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT. Total of ten (10) pages. Both documents are a total of (11) pages.
August 25, 2000, DEFENDANT'S [Faulkner] MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF A LEGAL EXPERT. Total of five (5) pages. Please note that the document is not dated and I did not receive a certificate of service with this document.
November 22, 2000, MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE MASON'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [dated October 31, 2000]. This document is being offered in PDF format due to the attachments which include letters from Lambros to Attorney Stenmoe dated November 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, and 15, 2000. Total pages including attachments are fifty-five (55). Please note that the 55 pages within this total document are hand numbered in the lower right hand corner of each page. Of interest is the fact that Faulkner committed fraud when he told Lambros that he could receive a seven (7) year sentence, as it was not within the plea agreement. See, U.S. vs. COLEMAN, 895 F.2d 501, 504-07 (8th Cir. 1990)(Notice must appear within plea agreement). Also Lambros did not provide assistance to the government, thus he is not a RAT and/or SNITCH. For some reason the Court does not want to give Lambros his Brazilian Constitutional Rights as required by the U.S.-BRAZIL Extradition Treaty. YOU MUST HAVE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 22, 2000 DOCUMENT IN PDF.
January 8, 2001, LAMBROS' LETTER TO JUDGE DAVID S. DOTY. Lambros' letter to Judge Doty offers an overview as to the June 26, 2000, United States Supreme Court decision in APPRENDI vs NEW JERSEY, 120 S.Ct 2348 and its effects as to LAMBROS' unconstitutional sentence. The facts and law within this letter supports the worst case scenario of LAMBROS receiving a sentence of 46 to 57 months of incarceration. Total of six (6) pages including the Certificate of Service. NO EXHIBITS SCANNED.
February 23, 2001, (Filed March 01, 2001) MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT AND/OR HAVE JUDGMENT VACATED UNDER FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 59(e). This document requests Judge Doty to amend and/or vacate his February 13, 2001 ORDER. Please note that LAMBROS raises four excellent issues with the most important being that the Minnesota Supreme Court decision CANNOT be applied retroactively. See, DZIBUBAK vs. MOTT, 503 N.W.2d 771, was decided on August 6, 1993 and LAMBROS' trial ended on January 15, 1993. Therefore, FAULKNER did not have immunity. Also an excellent overview on the new U.S. Supreme Court case GLOVER vs. U.S., No. 99-8576 (2001) which proves that PREJUDICE occurs if an attorney's ineffectiveness increases a prisoners time by one day. The issue of CAUSATION is a matter of fact to be decided by a jury, not a judge, is covered in issue four. The motion is a total of eleven (11) pages which includes a one page certificate of service.
March 5, 2001. SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT. This document was prepared by Attorney Stenmoe in support of LAMBROS February 23, 2001, RULE 59(e) MOTION. This motion is a total of two (2) pages.
March 12, 2001, PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO ATTORNEY STENMOE'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL WITHOUT SUBSTITUTION, DATED MARCH 6, 2001. This document is a total of three (3) pages which includes a one page certificate of service.
March 15, 2001, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENTER NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE INTO THIS ACTION. "CLAIM EIGHTEEN (18)" Dated: March 15, 2001. This document offers proof as to the 1976 indictment that prejudiced Lambros during his sentencing that FAULKNER either covered-up and/or was ineffective in not researching. Please note that the motion clearly proves that the following government officials violated Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1001, in offering false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations to the GRAND JURY: (a) Deputy United States Marshall James L. Propotnick; (b) Special Agent Donald E. Nelson of the Federal Drug Enforcement Administration; (c) James P. Braseth of the Federal Drug Enforcement Administration; and (d) Deputy United States Marshall Leon A. Cheney. This motion is a total of seven (7) pages which' includes a one page certificate of service. EXHIBITS NOT SCANNED.
May 21, 2001, APPEAL TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. This document is being offered in PDF format due to exhibits and requests that I've received in keeping the documents in original PDF format for possible filing in other jurisdictions. Documents within Lambros' appeal include: (a) BRIEF OF PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, total of 38 pages; (b) EXHIBITS OF PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, total of 35 pages; (c) May 22, 2001 cover letter to the Clerk of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, total of 1 page. Therefore this document has a GRAND TOTAL OF 74 PAGES and the pages, starting with the letter to the Clerk, BRIEF and EXHIBITS are all numbered from 1 thru 74 in the lower right hand corner of the documents in longhand, so Lambros' supporters are insured that they do not mix-up exhibit order, as they maybe confusing. CLICK HERE to view these pages in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD MAY 21, 2001 "APPEAL BRIEF AND EXHIBITS TO 8th CIRCUIT HERE IN PDF

The following is a copy of the STATEMENT OF ISSUES as it appears on pages vi. and vii. of Lambros May 21, 2001, BRIEF OF PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. Lambros is presenting five (5) issues for the Eighth Circuits review.

STATEMENT OF ISSUES

I. DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR IN DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT AGAINST GOVERNMENTAL OFFICIALS ON GROUNDS OF OFFICIAL IMMUNITY WITHOUT DETERMINATION THAT THE COMPLAINED-OF ACTS WERE OFFICIAL ACTS?

TOWER vs. GLOVER, 467 U.S. 914, 81 L.Ed.2d 758 (1984)

SCHEUER vs. RHODES, 416 U.S. 232, 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974)

DZIUBAK vs. MOTT, 503 N.W.2d 771 (Minn. 1993)

II. WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN RULING THAT APPELLANT LAMBROS WAS NOT PREJUDICED BY APPELLEE'S DEFICIENT PERFORMANCE THAT LEAD TO AN INCREASED PRISON SENTENCE FOR APPELLANT LAMBROS?

GLOVER vs. U.S., 121 S.Ct. 696, 148 L.Ed.2d 604 (2001)

U.S. vs. LAMBROS, 65 F.3d 698 (8th Cir. 1995)

III. WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED WHEN IT GAVE RETROACTIVE EFFECT TO A MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT JUDICIAL DECISION, WHERE THERE WAS NOTHING IN THE DECISION INDICATING THAT IT WAS TO HAVE RETROACTIVE EFFECT, THAT GAVE IMMUNITY TO STATE PUBLIC DEFENDERS, NOT FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS, WHEN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HAS DENIED FEDERAL COMMON LAW IMMUNITY TO COURT-APPOINTED ATTORNEYS SUED FOR MALPRACTICE BY HIS OWN CLIENT?

FERRI vs. ACKERMAN, 444 U.S. 193, 62 L.Ed.2d 355 (1979)

CHEVRON OIL CO. vs. HUSON, 404 U.S. 97, 30 L.Ed.2d 296 (1971)

IV. WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN RULING THAT THE ISSUE OF CAUSATION, UNDER MINNESOTA STATE LAW, IS A MATTER OF FACT TO BE DECIDED BY A JUDGE?

ST. PAUL, FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY vs. HONEYWELL, 2000 WL 685007 (Minn. App. 2000)

CHRISTY vs. SALITERMAN, 288 Minn. 144, 179 NW2d 288 (1970)

U.S. vs. COLEMAN, 895 F.2d 501 (8th Cir. 1990)

V. WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH RESPECT TO THE RACKETEERING (RICO) CLAIMS UNDER TITLE 18 U.S.C. f 1962(c) and (d) WHEN THERE ARE GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT REGARDING THE COMMISSION OF PREDICATE ACTS?

SEDIMA, S.P.R.L. vs. IMREX CO., 473 U.S. 479, 87 L.Ed.2d 346 (1985)

ANDERSON vs. LIBERTY LOBBY, INC., 477 U.S. 242, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986)

U.S. vs. EISEN, 974 F.2d 246 (2nd Cir. 1992)

BROWN vs LaSALLE NORTHWEST NATIONAL BANK, 820 F.Supp. 1078 (N.D.III. 1993)

July 26, 2001, "APPELLANT LAMBROS REQUESTS THIS COURT TO SANCTION ATTORNEY DEBORAH KAY ELLIS AND ATTORNEY DONNA RAE JOHNSON FOR THE JULY 18, 2001, FILING PURSUANT TO RULE 47A, EIGHTH CIRCUIT RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE." This document is seven (7) pages including cover-letter to Eighth Circuit and one (1) page exhibit. CLICK HERE to view these pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD JULY 26, 2001, MOTION TO 8TH CIRCUIT REQUESTING SANCTIONS HERE IN PDF.

October 17, 2001, "JUDGMENT" from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Please note that Clerk Michael E. Gans entered the ORDER. Of interest is the fact that the "JUDGMENT" states, "This court has reviewed the original file of the U.S. District Court. It is ordered by the court that the judgment of the district court is summarily affirmed and the motion for sanctions is denied. See, Eighth Circuit Rule 47A(a)." No judge signed this order only the Clerk!!!!!! This document is one (1) page in length in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 17, 2001, "JUDGMENT" BY EIGHTH CIRCUIT HERE IN PDF.

October 24, 2001, "MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR REHEARING (FRAP 40) WITH A SUGGESTION FOR PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (FRAP 35)." Also included is the October 30, 2001, ORDER by the Clerk of the Eighth Circuit granting LAMBROS an extension of time until November 13, 2001 to file a petition for rehearing. This package of documents is three (3) pages in length in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 24, 2001, MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND OCTOBER 30, 2001, ORDER HERE IN PDF.

October 27, 2001, LAMBROS submitted the following motions to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals: a) "APPELLANT LAMBROS OPPOSES THE JUDGMENT ENTERED BY THE CLERK ON OCTOBER 17, 2001, AND REQUESTS THE CLERK TO SUBMIT THE OCTOBER 17, 2001 JUDGMENT TO A PANEL OF THREE (3) JUDGES TO ACT. RULE 27B" This motion is two (2) pages in length; b) "PETITION FOR REHEARING (FRAP 40) WITH A SUGGESTION FOR PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (FRAP 35)." This motion is twelve (12) pages in length. I have also included the one page cover letter to the court. Therefore, there is a total of fifteen (15) pages in this total document, with the pages numbered in longhand in the lower right hand corner from 1 to 15. The documents are in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 27, 2001, MOTIONS REQUESTING REHEARING HERE IN PDF.

November 28, 2001, ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND FOR REHEARING EN BANC, by Eighth Circuit Judges JAMES B. LOKEN, MORRIS S. ARNOLD, and KERMIT E. BYE. This denial has completed the appeal process to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER, et al., Appeal file number 01-2037. This document is a total of one (1) page in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 28, 2001 ORDER DENYING REHEARING BY EIGHTH CIRCUIT HERE IN PDF.

UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION--BREACH OF U.S.-BRAZIL EXTRADITION TREATY.

May 8, 2000, served May 10, 2000, Appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. WARDEN J.W. BOOKER and the UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Case No. 00-3118, on Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas, Case No. 98-3148-RDR. This is Lambros' appeal as to the United States Parole Commission NOT honoring and breaking the law as to the Extradition Treaty between the U.S. and BRAZIL in forcing Lambros to serve a 5,357 day sentence that he was NOT extradited on nor required to serve, as per the rulings by the Brazilian Supreme Court on April 30, 1992, (see Exhibit A). This document is 56 total pages in length. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD THE DOCUMENT IN PDF

June 13, 2000, ORDER AND JUDGMENT from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. J.W. BOOKER; U.S. BOARD OF PAROLE, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, Case number 00-3118. The appeals court allowed the lower court's ruling to stand. Therefore, LAMBROS is now serving a CONSECUTIVE 5,357 day sentence that he WAS NOT EXTRADITED ON. What good are extradition treaties if the U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Justice, and the U.S. Parole Commission will not obey same??? This document is 5 total pages in length. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ADOBE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
DOWNLOAD THE DOCUMENT IN PDF


Lambros has tried for years to have the U.S. Department of Justice investigate and disclose the torture he experienced in Brazilian custody, to no avail. Lambros was arrested on May 17, 1991 by DEA AGENT TERRY ANDERSON IN RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL PURSUANT TO THE AUGUST 21, 1989 "WARRANT" BY THE U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION.

On December 7, 2011, The Wall Street Journal published an article entitled "U.S. Says Mexico Tortured American in Custody", by Nicholas Casey, Page A15. The article stated that on December 1, 2011, the U.S. Parole Commission made a finding that American citizen SHOHN HUCKABEE, 24, was "TORTURED IN FOREIGN CUSTODY" after his arrest on drug charges. The article also stated:

"The parole board reduced the five-year sentence given to him [Shohn Huckabee] by a MEXICAN JUDGE, AND RELEASED HIM WITH 'TIME SERVED,' or 26 months, under a treaty signed between the two countries. The commission didn't comment on the marijuana charges."

"The Dec. 1 finding could raise tensions between Washington and Mexico City over how Mexico is pursuing the drug war. Under terms of the MERIDA INITIATIVE, the $1.4 billion aid package given to Mexico and Central America government to fight drugs, Mexico could lose 15% of the aid if there is EVIDENCE OF HUMAN-RIGHTS VIOLATIONS."

"A spokesman for SENATOR KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON (R., Texas), warned Tuesday that the State Department "should be very carefully vetting MERIDA FUNDING," and asked that it "investigate the reported torture of SHOHN HUCKABEE."

Lambros has taken the following steps requesting Johanna Markind, Assistant General Counsel for the United States Parole Commission to open an investigation into Lambros' torture in Brazil by Brazilian authorities:

1. JANUARY 7, 2012: John Gregory Lambros' letter to Johanna Markind, Assistant General Counsel for the United States Parole Commission, requesting assistance in opening an investigation into Lambros' torture by Brazilian authorities AFTER being arrested by both U.S. and Brazilian authorities in May 1991. Lambros included as exhibits the December 7, 2011, article "U.S. SAYS MEXICO TORTURED AMERICAN IN CUSTODY", by Nicholas Casey that appeared within THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, Page A15 and page 699 from U.S. vs. LAMBROS, 65 F-3d 698 (8th Cir. 1995). This document is two (2) pages in length with two (2) pages of exhibits, a total of four (4) pages. THIS DOCUMENT IS IN PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD JANUARY 7, 2012 LAMBROS LETTER TO U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, HERE IN PDF.

2. JANUARY 25, 2012: Attorney Johanna E. Markind, U.S. Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission letter to John Gregory Lambros, as to receipt of Lambros' January 7, 2012 letter. This letter is from Rockne J. Chickinell, General Counsel by J. Markind. J. Markind states "Please note that the Commission does not have jurisdiction over your sentence, which was imposed by a federal district court (D.Minn.) under the Sentencing Reform Act. It is not a transfer case."

DOWNLOAD JANUARY 25, 2012 MARKIND LETTER TO LAMBROS, HERE IN PDF.

3. FEBRUARY 6, 2012: John Gregory Lambros' letter to Attorney Johanna E. Markind, Assistant General Counsel for the U.S. Parole Commission via U.S. Certified Mail No. 7008-1830-0004-2646-8997. Lambros responded to Attorney Markind's letter dated January 25, 2012, stating that she was incorrect that the U.S. Parole Commission did not have jurisdiction. Lambros stated the following facts: a) On August 21, 1989 the U.S. Parole Commission issued a WARRANT for Lambros' arrest and sentencing to 5,357 DAYS (141 years); b) On May 17, 1991, DEA Agent Terryl Anderson arrested John Gregory Lambros in Brazil PURSUANT TO THE AUGUST 21, 1989 "WARRANT" BY THE U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION; c) Lambros was TORTURED IN BRAZILIAN CUSTODY AFTER BEING TRANSFERRED TO THE TORTURE INVESTIGATION FACILITY IN BRASILIA, BRAZIL; d) Lambros was not allowed to see a judge or any type of court administrator while in custody in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil after his arrest and was ILLEGALLY MOVED to Brasilia, Brazil to be tortured and interrogated; e) Lambros offers court documents from DEA Agent Terryl Anderson as to his arrest of Lambros PURSUANT TO THE AUGUST 21, 1989 "PAROLE VIOLATION WARRANT". This document is four (4) pages in length with four (4) pages of exhibits, a total of eight (8) pages. THIS DOCUMENT IS IN PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 6, 2012 LAMBROS LETTER TO U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, HERE IN PDF.

4. MAY 5, 2012: John Gregory Lambros' letter to Attorney Johanna E. Markind, Assistant General Counsel for the U.S. Parole Commission via U.S. Certified Mail No. 7008-1830-0004-2646-9277. Lambros informs Attorney Markind that he has not received a response from his February 6, 2012 letter. Also Lambros offers an overview of documents as to proof of his torture in Brasilia, Brazil, which included: a) October 20, 1991, Sunday newspaper article from CAMPINAS [Sao Paulo, Brazil] entitled "MAFIOSO DA CAMORRO PRESO SOFREU TORTURAS NA DITADURA!" by Jose Francisco Pacola, states FRANCISCO TOSCANINO is currently being held at the Federal Police Station in Brasilia, Brazil AWAITING HIS EXTRADITION TO ITALY. B) February 12, 1996 letter from MAXIME TOSCANINO the son of FRANCISCO TOSCANINO offering information as to the name of FRANCISCO TOSCANINO'S lawyer in Brazil - Dr. Julio Cardella - and the location of his father - a maximum security prison near Naples, Italy. Maxime also included a copy of the October 20, 1991 newspaper article from Campinas. FRANCISCO TOSCANINO was tortured in the same facility and cell block Lambros was tortured in January 1973. See, U.S. vs. FRANCISCO TOSCANINO, 500 F.2d 267, 269-270 (2nd Cir. 1974). Finally, Lambros offers information regarding the January 11, 1993 "SUBPOENA" the U.S. Embassy received for MARGARET MURPHY, COUNSEL GENERAL FOR THE U.S. EMBASSY IN BRASILIA, BRAZIL. The Subpoena was an ORDER for Margaret Murphy to appear on January 14, 1993, in the U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, Courtroom 3 at 9:00 a.m. - Margaret Murphy did not appear to testify as to the torture Lambros received in Brasilia, Brazil. This document is four (4) pages in length with no exhibits. THIS DOCUMENT IS IN PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD MAY 5, 2012 LAMBROS LETTER TO U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, HERE IN PDF.

5. MARCH 8, 2012: CARLOS QUIJAS, 38 WAS RELEASED FROM A U.S. PRISON FRIDAY BY THE U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, which reduced his five-year sentence to time served. Carlos Quijas was the second American released from jail WHO WAS CONVICTED OF DRUG TRAFFICKING IN MEXICO AFTER CLAIMING THAT HE HAD BEEN TORTURED BY THE COUNTRY'S MILITARY. [Shohn Huckabee was the first] Mr. Quijas and Shohn Huckabee, were convicted in a Mexican court of drug trafficking in 2010 and transferred to the United States to serve their sentences. The two men deny the charges. This information appeared in an article entitled "U.S. Releases American In Cross-Border Drug Case", by Nicholas Casey. See, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, Thursday, March 8, 2012, Page A12.

MOTIONS AND OTHER LEGAL PLEADINGS

May 27, 1996, Lambros motion to U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, Third Division, U.S. v. Lambros, Criminal File No. CR-4-89-82, RE-SENTENCING OF LAMBROS. Request to have Department of State Employees given polygraph testing and questioning.
LAMBROS et al. vs. PETERSON et al., Civil Action File Number 3-95-836. TRAVERSE REPLY MOTION -- This pleading tells you everything you always wanted to know about the right of an American citizen to bail in a foreign country.
July 6, 1996 Motion in the criminal action UNITED STATES V. JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS, Criminal File Number CR-4-89-82(05) for an Order to Show Cause requiring the U.S. Embassy in Brazil to show why it should not be subject to sanctions for failure to comply with a Subpoena issued by the Federal District Court in Minnesota.

PLEADINGS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE RE-SENTENCING OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS ON REMAND FROM THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

October 20, 1995 Informational Memorandum from National Legal Professional Associates [NLPA] to interested counsel and clients regarding the appellate court victory in the Lambros criminal case with information on avoiding statutory life sentences. NLPA assists attorneys with legal research and in preparation of legal pleadings and oral arguments, specializing in federal post-conviction relief.
July 1, 1996 letter from Lambros to his Public Defender Colia Ceisel about issuing subpoenas, conducting depositions, and collecting of evidence for his re-sentencing.
July 2, 1996 letter from Lambros to the Clerk Federal District Court in Minneapolis requesting a formal investigation of Lambros's failure to receive notice of the actions of the United States Supreme Court.
July 9, 1996 letter from Lambros to 2 Leavenworth prison doctors about the competency hearing that will be held prior to Lambros's re-sentencing, and transmitting documents of interest to the doctors.
June 26, 1996 Lambros motion to the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, Third Division, U.S. v. Lambros, Criminal File No. CR-4-89-82, to require the Bureau of Prisons to transport Lambros's legal documents with him when he travels to the re-sentencing.
October 1, 1996 Order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, Third Division, U.S. v. Lambros, Criminal File No. CR-4-89-82, requiring the Bureau of Prisons to transport Lambros's legal documents with him when he travels to the re-sentencing.
July 5, 1996 letter from Lambros to the U.S Parole Office in Minneapolis transmitting information that Lambros wants considered in preparation of the Pre-Sentence Report to be prepared by that office for the re-sentencing
November 12, 1996, letter from Lambros to Judge Renner and Douglas Ray Peterson, as to newly discovered information regarding U.S. Army "DEPATTERNING/ GRID ROOMS" KNOWN AS THE "BOX" OR "WHITE ROOM." This letter explains the use of depatterning/grid rooms by the U.S. Army in Brasilia, Brazil after installation by the U.S. Corps of Engineers in the late 1960's and Army personal that trained the Brazilians in the use of same. The letter also offers locations of other depatterning/grid rooms at INSCOM HEADQUARTERS and INSCOM FIELD STATIONS globally. Past U.S. Penitentiary Officer M. Bridges offered information during the week of November 11, 1996 as to implants being being removed from government employees at U.S. Army Walter Reed Medical Hospital, 3rd Ward during the mid-1980's, as he was in charge of guarding the 3 or 4 persons per year treated for implant removal. This document is two (2) pages in length in PDF FORMAT. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 12, 1996, LETTER AS TO "DEPATTERNIENG/GRIED ROOMS" HERE IN PDF.
November 20, 1996 letter from Lambros to Federal Judge Renner and Lambros's attorney requesting that Dr. Criqui be subpoenaed to testify at the re-sentencing, and that he be paid by the government.

ROBERT G. RENNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, AS TO VIOLATIONS OF TITLE 28 U.S.C. 455(a) AND 455(b) (3). DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.WILL THE COURT CONDUCT A HEARING AT WHICH THERE WOULD BE FULL DISCLOSURE ON RECORD OF BASIS FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE RENNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 28 U.S.C.A. I 455(e)? See, IN RE KANSAS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, 85 F.3d 1353, 1359 (8th Cir. 1996); MORGAN vs. CLARKE, 296 F.3d 638, 648 (8th Cir. 2002); BARKSDALE vs. EMERICK, 853 F.2d 1359, 1361-1363 (6th Cir. 1988).

April 13, 2001, "MOTION TO VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS BY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ROBERT G. RENNER PURSUANT TO RULE 60(b)(6) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR VIOLATIONS OF TITLE 28 U.S.C.A. 455." This document was filed in U.S. vs. LAMBROS, Civil File No. 99-28 (RGR), Criminal File No. 4-89-82(05) and is a TOTAL OF 57 PAGES with some of the exhibit pages containing two (2) pages that have been reduced to assist in lowering coping costs to the courts. Therefore, what you are reviewing in PDF format is an exact copy of the document as presented to the court on April 20, 2001 via U.S. Certified Mail with Return Receipt Requested. Please note that Lambros has numbered each page, in longhand, in the lower right hand corner so his readers are insured that they don't mix-up exhibit order as they maybe confusing. CLICK HERE to view these pages in PDF format. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD APRIL 13, 2001 JUDGE RENNER DOCUMENT HERE IN PDF.

September 14, 2001, ORDER, by United States District Chief Judge JAMES M. ROSENBAUM, filed stamped by Clerk on September 18, 2001. Judge Rosenbaum ORDERED he government to respond to LAMBROS' MOTION TO VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS AND ORDER, by Monday, October 22, 2001. Also attached is the mailer slip that states this is part of Case No. 99-cv-28. This document contains two (2) pages. CLICK HERE to view these pages in PDF format. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE. PLEASE NOTE: IT APPEARS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ROBERT G. RENNER HAS RECUSED HIMSELF FROM LAMBROS' CASE, AS PER THIS ORDER. See, U.S. vs. ARNPRIESTER, 37 F.3d 466 (9th Cir. 1994)(U.S. District Judge cannot adjudicate case that he or she as U.S. Attorney began).

DOWNLOAD SEPTEMBER 14, 2001, ORDER BY U.S. DISTRICT CHIEF JUDGE JAMES M. ROSENBAUM HERE IN PDF

September 20, 2001, Civil Case No. 99-CV-28, LAMBROS' motion entitled, "SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO ASSIST THE COURT AND THE GOVERNMENT IN THEIR RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS, AS ORDERED BY JUDGE ROSENBAUM ON SEPTEMBER 14, 2001, FILED SEPTEMBER 18, 2001." This is a continuation of criminal file number 4-89-82(5). This document is a TOTAL OF 9 PAGES including a one page certificate of service, two page motion, and six pages of exhibits. LAMBROS has numbered each page, in longhand, in the lower right hand corner so his readers are insured that they don't mix-up exhibit order. CLICK HERE to view these pages in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD SEPTEMBER 20, 2001, MOTION DOCUMENT HERE IN PDF.

October 19, 2001, Civil Case No. 99-28 (RGR), criminal number 4-89-82(5), governments' motion entitled, "OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS." This document is a total of five (5) pages in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE TO VIEW THIS DOCUMENT. (The exhibits are not included within this download as they are court opinions and documents that appear within this web site). DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 19, 2001, OPPOSITION OF U.S. HERE IN PDF.

DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 19, 2001, OPPOSITION OF U.S. HERE IN PDF.

October 20, 2001, Civil Case No. 99-28 (RGR), criminal number 4-89-82(5), LAMBROS' "MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS FILED BY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ROBERT G. RENNER IN THIS ACTION." This document is a total of seven (7) pages including the one (1) page certificate of service in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 20, 2001, MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS BY JUDGE RENNER IN THIS ACTION HERE IN PDF.

October 30, 2001, Civil Case No. 99-28 (RGR), criminal number 4-89-82(5), LAMBROS' "MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO GOVERNMENTS' OPPOSITION DATED OCTOBER 19, 2001." This document is a total of two (2) pages including the one (1) page certificate of service in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. (The one page exhibit not included).

DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 30, 2001, MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME HERE IN PDF.

November 02, 2001, Civil Case No. 99-28 (RGR), criminal number 4-89-82(5), LAMBROS filed two (2) motions: a) "PETITION LAMBROS REQUESTS PERMISSION FROM THE COURT TO AMEND THIS ACTION UNDER RULE 15(a) & 19(a), FRCP." This motion is a total of four (4) pages with two (2) pages of exhibits. PLEASE NOTE that LAMBROS is including United States Chief Magistrate Judge FRANKLIN LINWOOD NOEL to this action, as Magistrate Judge NOEL was an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Minnesota, MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE, from 1983 thru 1989, the same years LAMBROS was alleged to have conspired in drug transaction that ended in LAMBROS' INDICTMENT on May 17, 1989, from the MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE of the U.S. Attorney's Office. Therefore, Magistrate Judge NOEL's violations of Title 28 USCS Sections 455(a) and 455(b)(3). b) "MOTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL." This motion is a total of two (2) pages. Therefore, there is a TOTAL OF NINE (9) PAGES including one (1) page for the certificate of service in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. (please note that the exhibits in this package may not be clear, as they where faxed copies to start with).

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 02, 2001 MOTIONS TO AMEND AND APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL HERE IN PDF.

November 09, 2001, Civil Case No. 99-28 (RGR), criminal number 4-89-82(5), LAMBROS' "PETITIONER LAMBROS' RESPONSE TO OCTOBER 19, 2001, 'OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS."' This document is fifteen (15) pages in length plus four (4) exhibit cover pages and one (1) page certificate of service page. Therefore, a TOTAL OF TWENTY (20) PAGES IN PDF FORMAT. PLEASE NOTE that the exhibit are not included in this download, but are available within the "SECOND AND SUCCESSIVE MOTIONS TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCES UNDER TITLE 28 U.S.C. 2255 BY JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS" section of this web site. See EXHIBIT INDEX within this document for exact descriptions. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 09, 2001, LAMBROS' RESPONSE TO U.S. GOVERNMENT HERE IN PDF.

November 10, 2001, Civil Case No. 99-28 (RGR), criminal number 4-89-82(5), LAMBROS' motion entitled, "ADDENDUM TO: PETITIONER LAMBROS' RESPONSE TO OCTOBER 19, 2001, 'OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS."' This motion is two (2) pages in length plus one (1) page for the certificate of service. Therefore, a TOTAL OF THREE (3) PAGES in PDF FORMAT. PLEASE NOTE that this addendum introduced Lambros' August 09, 2001, two page letter to The Honorable Charles E. Grassley, United States Senator, regarding the "INVESTIGATION INTO TORTURE AND ILLEGAL EXTRADITION PROCESS FROM BRAZIL TO THE UNITED STATES IN U.S. vs. LAMBROS, CR-4-89-82(5), DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA." Also, LAMBROS' August 09, 2001, "AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS TO THE UNITED STATES SENATE, 'COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY."' Copy of the August 09, 2001, letter and affidavit was attached to this motion when submitted to the Court. You may access copy of both the letter and affidavit by going to the beginning of this web sites' index and looking within the MAJOR DIVISION section under "UNITED STATES SENATOR CHARLES ERNEST GRASSLEY AND 'COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY' INVESTIGATE LAMBROS' TORTURE AND EXTRADITION FROM BRAZIL." THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 10, 2001, LAMBROS' ADDENDUM TO GOVERNMENT RESPONSE HERE IN PDF.

January 02, 2002, Civil Case No. 99-28(RGR), criminal number 4-89-82(5), LAMBROS' motion entitled, "MOTION TO DISCLOSE CURRENT INVESTIGATION BY THE MINNESOTA OFFICE OF LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY." This motion is three (3) pages in length plus a one (1) page certificate of service. Also there are thirty (30) pages of exhibits. Therefore, a TOTAL OF 34 PAGES. Please note that this motion discloses the investigation of Attorney Colia F. Ceisel; U.S. Assistant Attorney Douglas Peterson; and U.S. Attorney David L. Lillehaug, by the Minnesota Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, as to Lambros' February 10, 1997 resentencing hearing held before Judge Robert G. Renner. This motion is in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD JANUARY 02, 2002 MOTION DISCLOSING INVESTIGATION BY MINNESOTA OFFICE OF LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY HERE IN PDF.

March 08, 2002, ORDER by U.S. District Court Judge David S. Doty in criminal action 4-89-82(5)(DSD) and civil action 99-28(DSD). Judge Doty dismissed this action against Judge Renner stating, "Because the court concludes that these motions are collateral to the substantive motion which is being dismissed and since the court concludes that it lacks jurisdiction over this matter, the court will dismiss all of these motions." This motion is five (5) pages and being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD MARCH 08, 2002 ORDER BY JUDGE DAVID S. DOTY HERE IN PDF.

MARCH 27, 2002, NOTICE TO PERFORM AND/OR ACTUAL NOTICE to Robert G. Renner, U.S. Senior District Court Judge from John G. Lambros, dated March 27, 2002. Why was Judge Rosenbaum assigned the case when Judge Renner had been assigned from 1997 thru February 20, 2001? This letter is 7 pages in total with exhibits and being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD MARCH 27, 2002 LAMBROS' LETTER TO JUDGE RENNER HERE IN PDF.

April 10, 2002, Civil No. 99-28(DSD) and Criminal No. 4-89-82(5)(DSD). Lambros submits the following three (3) motions to the court, as to the appeal of Judge Doty's ORDER. (1) NOTICE OF APPEAL; (2) MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; and (3) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND/OR DIRECT APPEAL. A total of 39 pages including exhibits and cover letter to the Clerk of the Court in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. (Pages hand-numbered 1 thru 39 in lower right corner to assist you).

DOWNLOAD APRIL 10, 2002, LAMBROS' NOTICE OF APPEAL, CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY, AND WRIT OF MANDAMUM/DIRECT APPEAL HERE IN PDF.

April 16, 2002, Civil No. 99-28(DSD) and Criminal No. 4-89-82(DSD). Lambros submits his "ADDENDUM TO: MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY, Dated: April 10, 2002." This motion is 2 pages. The total document with exhibits and cover letter to the clerk of the court is six (6) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. (Pages hand-numbered 1 thru 6 in lower right corner to assist you).

DOWNLOAD APRIL 16, 2002 ADDENDUM TO: MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY HERE IN PDF.

April 23, 2002, letter from U.S. Court of Appeal for the Eighth Circuit offering the APPEAL NUMBER in this action, 02-2026, USA vs. LAMBROS. The clerk states that he received Lambros' notice of appeal and DOCKET ENTRIES from the district court and that Lambros' appeal has been referred to the appeals court for consideration. PROBLEM: Why didn't Judge Doty make an ORDER as to Lambros' April 10, 2002 motions before the Eighth Circuit was given Lambros' motions? This letter with attachments is three (3) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD APRIL 23, 2002 LETTER FROM EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL HERE IN PDF.

June 10, 2002, Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Number 02-2026, District of Minnesota Civil No. 99-28(DSD) and Criminal No. 4-89-82(DSD). Lambros' "MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY BY THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS." Please note that the U.S. Supreme Court has granted certiorari on the very same question Lambros is presenting to the Court. This motion is seven (7) pages including the cover letter to the court and Exhibit A and being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. Exhibit B of this document is Lambros' April 10, 2002, Motion for Issuance of Certificate of Appealability and is available within this section. Thank you.

DOWNLOAD JUNE 10, 2002, COA TO EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF "APPEALS HERE IN PDF.

July 1, 2002, Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals No. 02-2026, District of Minnesota Civil No. 99-28(DSD) and Criminal No. 4-89-82(DSD). ORDER by the Eighth Circuit DENYING Lambros' Motion for a COA, for the reasons stated by the district court. The court's order is two (2) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD JULY 1, 2002, ORDER BY EIGHTH CIRCUIT HERE IN PDF.

July 11, 2002, Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals No. 02-2026, USA vs. LAMBROS, District of Minnesota No. 99-28(DSD) and Criminal No. 4-89-82(DSD), Lambros' filing of PETITION FOR REHEARING (FRAP 40) WITH A SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (FRAP 35). This motion and cover letter to the court is eighth (8) pages, NOT including exhibits in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. (Please note that exhibit B is Lambros' February 15, 2002 FILING OF COMPLAINT against U.S. Attorney Renner with the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, St. Paul, Minnesota. This document is available within this web site by entering February 15, 2002 into the search engine of this web site)

DOWNLOAD JULY 11, 2002, PETITION FOR REHEARING WITH SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC HERE IN PDF.

October 19, 2002, filed on November 1, 2002, and placed on the docket of the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES on November 12, 2002, as docket number 02-7346, JOHN G. LAMBROS vs. UNITED STATES, Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. This is the final stage for Lambros' "MOTION TO VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS BY U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ROBERT G. RENNER PURSUANT TO RULE 60(b)(6) OF FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR VIOLATIONS OF TITLE 28 U.S.C.A. 455." This petition is a total of 93 pages including exhibits and is numbered in the lower right hand corner to assure order in your review. This PDF FORMATTED DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT. (On December 5, 2002 the Solicitor General requested an extension of time to respond.

DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 19, 2002, WRIT OF CERTIORARI HERE IN PDF.

January 13, 2003, United States Supreme Court docket number 02-7346, LAMBROS vs. USA, BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES IN OPPOSITION. This is Solicitor General Theodore B. Olson, Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff, and Attorney Michael A. Rotker's response to Lambros' October 19, 2002, Writ of Certiorari. Please note that the government does not respond to the actions of MAGISTRATE JUDGE FRANKLIN LINWOOD NOEL'S within the response. Thus, "establishing a claim or right to relief by evidence satisfactory to the court." See, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55(e). This document is a total of twenty-one (21) pages in PDF FORMAT and numbered in the lower right hand corner to assure order in your review. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD JANUARY 13, 2003, GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO WRIT OF CERTIORARI HERE IN PDF.

January 29, 2003, filed January 30, 2003, United States Supreme Court number 02-7346, LAMBROS vs. USA, PETITIONER LAMBROS' RESPONSE BRIEF TO BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES IN OPPOSITION DATED JANUARY 13, 2003. This is Lambros' response to the Solicitor General's brief. Please note that Lambros advises the court that AT LEAST FOUR (4) MEMBERS OF THE COURT GRANTED CERTIORARI ON THE SAME QUESTION LAMBROS IS PRESENTING AND JUSTICE STEVENS, WHO REMAINS OUTSIDE THE POOL, BELIEVES THE QUESTION LAMBROS PRESENTS SHOULD BE ANSWERED. Therefore, five (5) members (at LEAST five) of the United States Supreme Court, meeting the unwritten "rule of four", have already decided LAMBROS' question should be granted and placed on the calendar for hearing and decision. Also, Solicitor General Olson, has sent a not-so-subtle signal to the court that it SHOULD NOT IGNORE Lambros' question, as the government ONLY responds to approximately five (5%) percent of all "in forma pauperis" filings, the so-called "pauper" docket. This document has forty-nine (49) pages, including exhibits, in PDF FORMAT and numbered in the lower right hand corner in long hand to assure order in your review. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD JANUARY 29, 2003, LAMBROS' RESPONSE BRIEF TO WRIT OF CERTIORARI HERE IN PDF.

February 22, 2003, filed February 25, 2003, CORRECTED RESPONSE BRIEF BY LAMBROS, in LAMBROS vs. USA, U.S. Supreme Court docket number 02-7346. This is PETITIONER LAMBROS' RESPONSE BRIEF TO BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES IN OPPOSITION DATED JANUARY 13, 2003. Please note that the Clerk returned Lambros' January 29, 2003 brief due to a violation of Rule 33.2(b) that requires a 15 page limit on response briefs. This document is forty-eight (48) pages, including exhibits, in PDF FORMAT and numbered in the lower right hand corner in long-hand to assure order for your review. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 22, 2003. LAMBROS' "CORRECTED" RESPONSE BRIEF TO WRIT OF CERTIORARI HERE IN PDF.

February 24, 2003, ORDER from U.S. Supreme Court in LAMBROS vs. U.S., No. 02-7346, PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI DENIED. This document is one (1) page in PDF format. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 24, 2003, SUPREME COURT ORDER HERE IN PDF.

March 07, 2003, letter from Clerk of Supreme Court to LAMBROS in LAMBROS vs. USA, returning CORRECTED RESPONSE BRIEF in light of denial of writ of certiorari on February 24, 2003, in Case No. 02-7346. This document is one (1) page in PDF format. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD MARCH 07, 2003 LETTER FROM SUPREME COURT HERE IN PDF.

March 07, 2003, "MOTION TO THE HONORABLE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS, AS CIRCUIT JUSTICE, TO SUSPEND A PREVIOUS ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT DENYING CERTIORARI, PENDING ACTION ON THE PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR REHEARING," in LAMBROS vs. USA, File No. 02-7346. This document is twelve (12) pages including cover letter and DOES NOT include exhibits that are available within this web site already. All pages are hand-numbered in the lower right hand corner to assure order. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD MARCH 07, 2003, MOTION TO SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS HERE IN PDF.

March 17, 2003, letter from Clerk of Supreme Court in LAMBROS vs. USA, File No. 02-7346, returning LAMBROS' March 07, 2003, MOTION TO THE HONORABLE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS. This states that LAMBROS' motion "does not have appended thereto a copy of a stay order that was dissolved upon the denial of certiorari nor does it otherwise clearly indicate the effect of the denial of certiorari." This document is one (1) page in PDF FORMAT. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD MARCH 17, 2003 LETTER FROM U.S. SUPREME COURT HERE IN PDF.

March 13, 2003, PETITION FOR REHEARING in LAMBROS vs. USA, Supreme Court File No. 02-7346. This document is sixteen (16) -pages including cover letter and exhibits in PDF FORMAT All pages are hand-numbered in the lower right hand corner to assure order. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD MARCH 13, 2003, PETITION FOR REHEARING HERE IN PDF.

April 21, 2003, the United States Supreme Court DENIED Lambros' PETITION FOR REHEARING in LAMBROS vs. USA, Supreme Court file No. 02-7346.

May 20, 2003, Lambros RETURNS TO THE DISTRICT COURT and files a MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT DUE TO INTERVENING CHANGE IN CONTROLLING LAW UNDER ANY ONE OF THREE SEPARATE SUBSECTIONS OF FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(b) - SECTIONS ONE, FIVE, AND SIX. This document appears in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota file numbers: Civil No. 99-28(DSD) and Criminal No. 4-89-82 (DSD). This document is thirty-three (33) pages including cover letter and exhibits in PDF FORMAT. All pages are hand-numbered in the lower right hand corner to assure order. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD MAY 20, 2003, MOTION AS TO INTERVENING CHANGE IN CONTROLLING LAW HERE IN PDF.

July 07, 2003, U.S. Attorney Thomas B. Heffelfinger and U.S. Assistant Attorney Jeffrey S. Paulsen's "OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT DUE TO INTERVENING CHANGE IN CONTROLLING LAW." This document appears in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota file number: Criminal NO. 4-89-82(5)(DSD) and Civil No. 99-28(DSD). This document is seven (7) pages including exhibits in PDF FORMAT. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD JULY 07, 2003, OPPOSITION OF UNITED STATES DUE TO-CHANCE IN LAW HERE IN PDF.

July 15, 2003, "PETITIONER LAMBROS' RESPONSE TO THE GOVERNMENT'S "OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT DUE TO INTERVENING CHANGE IN CONTROLLING LAW." LAMBROS vs. U.S.A, Civil No. 99-28(DSD) and Criminal No. 4-89-82(5)(DSD). This document is twelve (12) pages including cover letter in PDF FORMAT. All pages are hand-numbered in the lower right hand corner to assure order. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT. (Please note that the government is lying to the court stating Lambros' appeal was decided on the MERITS.)

DOWNLOAD JULY 15, 2003, RESPONSE BY LAMBROS TO GOVT. DUE TO CHANGE IN LAW HERE IN PDF.

September 30, 2003, filed October 02, 2003, "MOTION OFFERING CLARIFICATION OF FACTS, RECORD, AND EVIDENCE PERTINENT TO EXISTING ISSUES IN THIS ACTION AS TO THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROCEEDING THAT RESULTED IN THE DISTRICT COURT'S JUDGMENT ON FEBRUARY 10, 1997, AT RESENTENCING OF JOHN G. LAMBROS BY THE HONORABLE ROBERT G. RENNER." LAMBROS vs. USA, Civil No. 99-28(DSD) and Criminal No. 4-89-82(5)(DSD). This document is fifty-five (55) pages including cover letter to the clerk and exhibits in PDF FORMAT. All pages are hand-numbered in the lower right hand corner to assure order. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT. Of interest in this document is the fact that Judge Renner would not give Lambros a HEARING as to a marijuana conspiracy when he was required to do so at RESENTENCING when he turned Lambros' Rule 33 MOTIONS into a Section 2255. See paragraph 27 within this document for case law.

DOWNLOAD SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 CLARIFICATION OF FACTS AS TO RESENTENCING HERE IN PDF.

October 23, 2003, ORDER by U.S. District Court Judge David S. Doty in USA vs. LAMBROS, Civil No. 99-28(DSD), Criminal No. 4-89-82(5)(DSD/FLN). Judge Doty states, "Because the court finds no intervening change in law requiring it to vacate its dismissal of defendant's purported Rule 60(b) motion or its denial of defendant's motion for COA, the present motion is denied." This document is seven (7) pages in PDF FORMAT. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT. Of interest is the fact a HEARING FOR FULL DISCLOSURE ON THE RECORD has never been conducted in this case, as required by TITLE 28 U.S.C. 5455(e). See, BARKSDALE vs. EMERICK, 853 F.2d 1359 (6th Cir. 1988).

DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 23, 2003, ORDER BY JUDGE DAVID S. DOTY HERE IN PDF.

October 30, 2003, "MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT OF THIS COURT'S ORDER DATED OCTOBER 23, 2003, PURSUANT TO RULE 59(e) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE." LAMBROS vs. USA, Civil No. 99-28(DSD), Criminal No. 4-89-82(5) (DSD/FLN). This document is twelve (12) pages including cover letter to clerk and exhibits in PDF FORMAT. All pages are hand-numbered in the lower right hand corner to assure order. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 30, 2003, RULE 59(e) MOTION HERE IN PDF.

November 06, 2003, ORDER by U.S. District Court Judge David S. Doty. LAMBROS vs. USA, Civil No. 99-28(DSD), Criminal No. 4-89-82(5)(DSD/FLN). Judge Doty ORDERED that Lambros' Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment be denied. This document is three (3) pages in PDF FORMAT. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 06, 2003, ORDER BY JUDGE DAVID S. DOTY HERE IN PDF.

November 25, 2003, Lambros' "NOTICE OF APPEAL" and "MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY." USA vs. LAMBROS, Civil No. 99-28(DSD), Criminal No. 4-89-82(5)(DSD/FLN). Lambros requests a Certificate of Appealability as to the issue, "WHY CHIEF JUDGE JAMES M. ROSENBAUM NOR JUDGE DAVID S. DOTY DID NOT CONDUCT A FULL-HEARING AT WHICH THERE WOULD BE FULL DISCLOSURE ON RECORD FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE RENNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 28 U.S.C.A. 455(e)?" The District Court was bound to conduct a HEARING as per precedent of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. See, MORGAN vs. CLARKE, 296 F.3d 638, 648 (8th Cir. 2002); IN RE KANSAS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, 85 F.3d 1353, 1359 (8th Cir. 1996); BARKSDALE vs. EMERICK, 853 F.2d 1359, 1361-1363 (6th Cir. 1988). This document is twenty (20) pages including cover letter to clerk and exhibits in PDF FORMAT. All pages are hand-numbered in the lower right hand corner to assure order. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 25, 2003, NOTICE OF APPEAL AND CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY HERE IN PDF.

February 20, 2004, Filed February 23, 2004, ORDER by District Court Judge David S. Doty in USA vs. LAMBROS, Civil No. 99-28(DSD), Criminal No. 4-89-82(5)(DSD/FLN). Judge Doty ordered Lambros' CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILTY denied. PLEASE NOTE that Judge Doty does not state one word in his order as to the reasons he would not conduct a FULL-HEARING AT WHICH THERE WOULD BE FULL DISCLOSURE ON RECORD FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE RENNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 28 U.S.C.A. 455(e). WHY???? This document is six (6) pages in PDF FORMAT. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 20, 2004, FILED FEBRUARY 23, 2004, ORDER BY JUDGE DOTY HERE IN PDF.

March 16, 2004, Lambros' "MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY BY THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS," in USA vs. LAMBROS, Civil No. 99-28(DSD), Criminal No. 4-89-82(DSD/FLN), Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals No. 04-1559. Because "[a] district court by definition abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law," KOON vs. U.S., 135 L.Ed.2d 392 (1996), Quoting, U.S. vs. DICKERSON, 166 F.3d 667, 680 (4th Cir. 1999), Lambros informs the Eighth Circuit the merits of this action have never been ruled on, as NO HEARING WAS CONDUCTED AS TO THE BASIS FOR DISQUALIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 28 U.S.C.A. 455(e). This document is eleven (11) pages including cover letter to clerk and exhibit page informing the reader where to download exhibits in PDF FORMAT. All pages are hand-numbered in the lower right hand corner to assure order. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD MARCH 16, 2004, MOT10N FOR COA BY EIGHTH CIRCUIT HERE IN PDF.

April 13, 2005, Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals PUBLISHED OPINION in USA vs. LAMBROS, No. 04-1559, Published case cite: U.S.A. vs. LAMBROS, 404 F.3d 1034 (8th Cir. 2005). Again, just another cover-up by the courts, as the court does not mention JUDGE RENNER'S name in their order one time nor address why no hearing was conducted in accordance with Title 28 U.S.C.A. 455(e). This document is four (4) pages in length in PDF FORMAT. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD APRIL 13, 2005, U.S. vs. LAMBROS, 404 F.3d 1034 (8th Cir. 2005)

May 17, 2005, Docketed by Clerk of the U.S. SUPREME COURT on May 23, 2005, as NO. 04-10270, LAMBROS vs. U.S.. Lambros presented the following two (2) quesltions to the Supreme Court: (1) Did the Eighth Circuit err in holding, in square conflict with decisions of this court and other circuits, that every federal rule of civil procedure 60(b) motion constitutes a prohibited "second or successive" habeas petition when requesting relief due to change in the law? (2) Did the Eighth Circuit err in holding, in square conflict with decisions of this court and other circuits, that every federal rule of civil procedure 60(b)(1), (b)(5), and (b)(6) motion constitutes a prohibited "second or successive" habeas petition as a matter of law when used to cure procedural violations of Title 28 U.S.C.A. 455('E.) and 455(b)(3) in an earlier proceeding - here, a proceeding that raise questions about that proceeding's integrity? IMPORTANT: On January 14, 2005 the Supreme Court granted certiorari and conducted a hearing on April 25, 2005 in GONZALEZ vs. CROSBY, No. 04-6432, as to the question: (1) Did court of appeals err in holding that every Rule 60(b) motion (other than for fraud under (b)(3)) constitutes prohibited "second or successive" petition as matter of law, in square conflict with decisions of the court and other circuits? Lambros' WRIT OF CERTIORARI is seventy- seven (77) pages in length in PDF FORMAT. The page count includes the cover-letter and exhibits and the pages are numbered by hand in the lower right hand corner to assist. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD MAY 23, 2005, WRIT OF CERTIORARI LAMBROS vs. US, No. 04-10270.

June 20, 2005, The U.S. Supreme Court denied Lambros writ of certiorari in LAMBROS vs. USA, NO. 04-10270. The one (1) page denial is offered in PDF FORMAT. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.
DOWNLOAD JUNE 20, 2005 ORDER BY SUPREME COURT, No. 04-10270.

The above April 13, 2001, "MOTION TO VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS BY U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ROBERT G. RENNER PURSUANT TO RULE 60(b)(6) OF FEDERAL RULES OF-CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR VIOLATIONS OF TITLE 28 U.S.C.A. 455" proves, as per Section 455, that the average person on the street "MIGHT" harbor doubts and reasonably question U.S. District Court Judge Robert G. Renner's impartiality toward JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS during all proceedings when Judge Renner was the United States Attorney for Minnesota that investigated and prosecuted LAMBROS in 1975 and 1976. Title 28 U.S.C. 455(a) states, "[A]ny justice, JUDGE, or magistrate of the United States shall DISQUALIFY himself in ANY proceeding in which his IMPARTIALITY MIGHT REASONABLY BE QUESTIONED." Title 28 U.S.C. 455(b)(3) states, "[(b)] He shall also DISQUALIFY himself in the following circumstances: (3) Where he has served in governmental employment and in such capacity participated as counsel, adviser or material witness concerning the proceeding or expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in controversy." The following facts are exposed within the April 13, 2001, MOTION:

a. U.S. Attorney Robert G. Renner ILLEGALLY indicted LAMBROS on March 24, 1976 and assisted in the illegal sentencing of LAMBROS on June 21, 1976, as to violations of law that did not occur on federal property. Title 18 U.S.C. Sections Ill and 114. See, EXHIBIT A. (as to Criminal File Number CR-3-76-17, District of Minnesota).

b. The U.S. Attorney's Office in Minneapolis FALSIFIED documents to the U.S. Court of Appeals as to the March 24, 1976 INDICTMENT, as the Eighth Circuit stated LAMBROS was indicted on violations of Title 18 U.S.C. H 111 and 1114, not 114 as stated in the indictment and judgment order signed by Judge Devit. See, U.S. vs. LAMBROS, 614 F.2d 179, 180 (8th Cir. 1980).

c. The U.S. Attorney Robert G. Renner and his employees in 1976 used an ILLEGAL indictment to leverage a negotiated plea of guilty from LAMBROS on charges unrelated. See, U.S. vs. LAMBROS, 544 F.2d 962 (8th Cir. 1976).

d.Warden Mickey Ray is requested to investigate why two (2) JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDERS appear within Lambros' U.S. Bureau of Prisons file at Leavenworth Penitentiary, as to U.S. vs. LAMBROS., Docket Number CR-3-76-17, District of Minnesota. This is the same criminal case U.S. Attorney Robert G. Renner, now U.S. Judge Renner, indicted Lambros on March 24, 1976, for ASSAULT and changed the charges to MURDER after Lambros plead to an illegal indictment for assault. Lambros' August 20, 2001 letter to Warden Mickey Ray is a TOTAL OF 9 PAGES including exhibits. CLICK HERE to view these pages in PDF format. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD AUGUST 20, 2001, WARDEN MICKEY RAY LETTER HERE IN PDF.

e. October 12, 2001, Lambros' letter to Warden Mickey E. Ray as to Warden Rays' response to Lambros' filing of administrative remedy case number 250231-F1. This is a continuation of Lambros' above August 20, 2001 letter to Warden Ray as to the actions of Judge Renner. This letter is a total of three (3) pages without exhibits in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 12, 2001, WARDEN MICKEY E. RAY LETTER HERE IN PDF.

f. Attorney Peter Thompson, Thompson & Sicoli, LTD, 2520 Park Ave., Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404-4403, was paid by Lambros to represent him in 1976 and 1977 in Criminal Indictments CR-3-75-128; CR-3-76-17; and CR-3-76-54. Attached for your review are Lambros' letters dated March 30, 2001 and November 20, 2001 to Attorney Thompson. As of January 09, 2002, Attorney Thompson has not responded to Lambros nor provided an AFFIDAVIT to the Court as to Lambros' guilty plea to violations of Title 18 U.S.C. if Ill and 114, in U.S. vs. LAMBROS, CR-376-17. Both letters are a total of two (2) pages without exhibits in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD MARCH 30, 2001 AND NOVEMBER 20, 2001 ATTORNEY PETER TH0MPSON LETTERS HERE IN PDF.

: www.PetitionOnline.com/jlambros/petition.html

SECOND AND SUCCESSIVE MOTIONS TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCES UNDER TITLE 28 U.S.C. 2255 BY JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS.

The following second or successive motions filed under Title 28 U.S.C. 2255 are directly or indirectly due to the actions of United States Attorney ROBERT G. RENNER in 1975 and 1976, now United States District Court Judge ROBERT G. RENNER who resentenced LAMBROS in 1996. You be the judge if "IMPARTIALITY MIGHT BE QUESTIONED" as to the actions of ROBERT G. RENNER, and then review LAMBROS' April 13, 2001, "MOTION TO VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS BY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ROBERT G. RENNER PURSUANT TO RULE 60(b)(6) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR VIOLATIONS OF TITLE 28 U.S.C.A. 455."

1. April 06, 2001, (as to Criminal No. 3-76-54, District Court), "MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER TITLE 28 U.S.C. 2255 BY A PRISONER IN FEDERAL CUSTODY." Total pages one (1). Also the April 06, 2001, "MOVANT'S [Lambros'] MEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW IN SUPPORT OF (AFFIDAVIT FORM) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER TITLE 28 U.S.C. 2255 BY A PRISONER IN FEDERAL CUSTODY." Total pages 41 with exhibits. This document was filed in LAMBROS vs. U.S., No. 01-1954MN, Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals and is a TOTAL OF 43 PAGES WITH EXHIBITS and certificate of service. Therefore, you are reviewing in PDF FORMAT an exact copy of the documents presented to the Eighth Circuit. Of interest is the fact that U.S. Attorney ROBERT G. RENNER, on September 14, 1996, directly or indirectly MANIPULATED a FEDERAL GRAND JURY in returning an illegal indictment against LAMBROS by not informing the GRAND JURY that they needed to make a probable cause finding that LAMBROS had "POSSESSION" and "INTENT" to distribute a controlled substance. Courts have continually held that the "POSSESSION" and "INTENT" element must be contained within the indictment for the indictment to be legally sufficient to comply with the GRAND JURY clause of the Fifth Amendment. See, Issue Two (2), pages 19 thru 23 within the MEMORANDUM OF FACTS AND LAW. During trial LAMBROS was found guilty on Counts 4, 5, & 7 and NOT GUILTY on Counts 1, 2, and 3. LAMBROS has numbered each page, in longhand, in the lower right hand corner so his readers are insured that they don't mix-up exhibit order as they maybe confusing. CLICK HERE to view these pages in PDF format. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD APRIL 06, 2001, SECOND AND SUCCESSIVE 2255 DOCUMENT HERE IN PDF.

2. May 1, 2001, (as to Criminal No. 3-76-54, District Court), "OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO PETITION'S APPLICATION TO FILE SUCCESSIVE SECTION 2255 PETITION," in LAMBROS vs. U.S., No. 01-1954MN, Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Cover letter and motion are a total of two (2) pages.

3. June 6, 2001, (as to Criminal No. 3-76-54, District Court), "JUDGMENT" by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, in LAMBROS vs. U.S., No. 01-1954. Judges LOKEN, BEAM, ARNOLD DENIED Lambros' request to file a successive habeas application. This document is one (1) page.

4. June 02, 2001, (as to Criminal No. 3-75-128, District Court), "MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255 BY A PRISONER IN FEDERAL CUSTODY." (8th Circuit No. 01-2370MN) Total pages one (1). Also the June 02, 2001, "MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255 BY A PRISONER IN FEDERAL CUSTODY." Total of 53 pages with exhibits. This document with cover letter and certificate of service is a TOTAL OF 56 PACES WITH EXHIBITS. Therefore, you are reviewing in PDF FORMAT an exact copy of the documents presented to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Of interest is the fact U.S. Attorney ROBERT C. RENNER returned the February 23, 1976 INDICTMENT in this original action. See, EXHIBIT A. The GRAND JURY was allowed to return an indictment illegally when it was instructed that it DID NOT have to find LAMBROS POSSESSED drugs nor INTENTIONALLY violated the drug laws of the United States as per Title 21 U.S.C. Courts have continually held that the "POSSESSION" and "INTENT" elements must be contained within the indictment for the indictment to be legally sufficient to comply with the GRAND JURY clause of the FIFTH AMENDMENT. This document has been numbered in longhand from I to 56 in the lower right hand corner of each page to ensure readers that pages and exhibits don't get mixed-up. CLICK BELOW to view these pages in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER NAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD JUNE 02, 2001, SECOND AND SUCCESSIVE 2255 DOCUMENT HERE IN PDF.

5. June 18, 2001, (as to Criminal No. 3-75-128, District Court), "OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO PETITIONER'S APPLICATION TO FILE SUCCESSIVE SECTION 2255 PETITION," in LAMBROS vs. U.S., 01-2370MN, Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Cover letter one (1) page, Motion two (2) pages, and exhibit one (1) page, thus a total of four (4) pages in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD JUNE 18, 2001, OPPOSITION OF UNITED STATES IN LAMBROS vs. U.S., 01-2370MN DOCUMENT HERE IN PDF.

6. June 23, 2001, (as to Criminal No. 3-75-128, District Court), "PETITIONER LAMBROS' RESPONSE TO GOVERNMENTS OPPOSITION. Dated June 18, 2001," in LAMBROS vs. U.S., 01-2370MN, Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Certificate of Service one (1) page and the motion and exhibits are twelve (12) pages, thus a TOTAL OF 13 PAGES in PDF FORMAT. Please note that LAMBROS requests the Eighth Circuit to SANCTION Assistant U.S. Attorney JEFFREY S. PAULSEN under a combination of Rule 11 and Section 1927 for not telling the truth to the court as to facts and law. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD JUNE 23, 2001, PETITIONER LAMBROS' RESPONSE TO GOVERNMENT'S OPPOSITION DOCUMENT HERE IN PDF.

7. This space is reserved for "JUDGMENT" in Criminal No. 3-75-128, District Court, by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.

8. June 08, 2001, (as to Criminal No. 3-76-17, District Court), "MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255 BY A PRISONER IN FEDERAL CUSTODY." (8th Circuit Court No. 01-2703). Total pages one (1). Also the June 08, 2001, "MOVANT'S MEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW IN SUPPORT OF (Affidavit form) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255 BY A PRISONER IN FEDERAL CUSTODY." Total of 36 pages with exhibits. This document with cover letter and certificate of service is a TOTAL OF 39 PAGES WITH EXHIBITS. Therefore, you are reviewing in PDF FORMAT an exact copy of the documents presented to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Of interest is the fact that the GRAND JURY was allowed to indict LAMBROS ILLEGALLY as Title 18 Section 114 ONLY ALLOWS FOR THE ALLEGED CRIME TO HAVE TAKEN PLACE ON LAND OWNED BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT. The alleged crime in this indictment occurred at LAMBROS' house that is not located on land owned by the United States Government.

PLEASE NOTE: ROBERT G. RENNER was the U.S. Attorney who signed the indictment. Also the following individuals lied directly or indirectly to the GRAND JURY and other federal employees: Deputy United States Marshall JAMES L. PROPOTNICK, Special Agents DONALD E. NELSON of the DEA, JAMES P. BRASETH of the DEA, and Deputy United States Marshall LEON A. CHENEY, as to the alleged crime occurring on land owned by the United States Government. There are also numerous elements missing from the indictment including the words "WILLFULLY, INTIMIDATES, INTENT TO MAIN, etc." all of which are required to be contained within the indictment to be legally sufficient to comply with the GRAND JURY clause of the FIFTH AMENDMENT. This document has been numbered in longhand from 1 to 39 in the lower right hand corner of each page to ensure readers that pages and exhibits don't get mixed-up. CLICK BELOW to view these pages in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD JUNE 08, 2001, SECOND AND SUCCESSIVE 2255 DOCUMENT HERE IN PDF.

9. July 10, 2001, (as to Criminal No. 3-76-17, District Court), "OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO PETITIONER'S APPLICATION TO FILE SUCCESSIVE SECTION 2255 PETITION," in LAMBROS vs. U.S.A., 01-2703 Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Cover letter one (1) page, Motion one (1) page. Therefore, a TOTAL OF 2 PAGES in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD JULY 10, 2001, OPPOSITION OF U.S. GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT HERE IN PDF.m

10. July 17, 2001, (as to Criminal No. 3-76-17, District Court), "PETITIONER LAMBROS' RESPONSE TO OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO PETITIONER'S APPLICATION TO FILE SUCCESSIVE SECTION 2255 PETITION, DATED JULY 10, 2001," in LAMBROS vs.U.S.A., No. 01-2703 Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Certificate of service one (1) page, Motion five (5) pages. Therefore, a TOTAL OF SIX (6) PAGES in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD JULY 17, 2001, LAMBROS' RESPONSE TO GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT HERE IN PDF.

11. This space is reserved for the "JUDGMENT" in Criminal No. 3-76-17, District Court, by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.

12. June 18, 2001, (as to Criminal No. 4-89-82, District Court), "MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255 BY A PRISONER IN FEDERAL CUSTODY." (8th Circuit Court of Appeals No. 01-2671). Total of one (1) page. Also the June 18, 2001, "MOVANT'S MEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW IN SUPPORT OF (Affidavit form) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255 BY A PRISONER IN FEDERAL CUSTODY." Total of 75 pages with exhibits. This document with cover letter and certificate of service is a TOTAL OF 78 PAGES WITH EXHIBITS. Therefore, you are reviewing in PDF FORMAT an exact copy of the documents presented to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Of interest is the fact that the government does not want to admit that LAMBROS was given MARIJUANA by a GOVERNMENT PAID INFORMANT BY THE NAME OF DONALD HENDRICKSON (who has a brother in Duluth, Minnesota) and that the jury did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt the quantity and type of controlled substance involved within the alleged crime. This document has been numbered in longhand from I to 78 in the lower right hand corner of each page to ensure readers that pages and exhibits don't get mixed-up. CLICK BELOW to view these pages in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD JUNE 18, 2001, SECOND AND SUCCESSIVE 2255 DOCUMENT HERE IN PDF.

13. July 16, 2001, (as to Criminal No. 4-89-82, District Court), "OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO PETITIONER'S APPLICATION TO FILE SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE SECTION 2255 PETITION," in LAMBROS vs. U.S.A., No. 01-2671 EIGHTH CIRCUIT Court of Appeals. Cover letter one (1) page, Motion one (1) page. Therefore, a TOTAL OF 2 PAGES in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD JULY 16, 2001, OPPOSITION OF U.S. GOVERNMENT HERE IN PDF.

14. July 23, 2001, (as to Criminal No. 4-89-82, District Court), "PETITIONER LAMBROS' RESPONSE TO OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO PETITIONER'S APPLICATION TO FILE SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE SECTION 2255 PETITION, DATED JULY 16, 2001," in LAMBROS vs. U.S.A., No. 01-2671 EIGHTH CIRCUIT Court of Appeals. Certificate of service one (1) page, Motion five (5) pages. Therefore, a TOTAL OF SIX (6) PAGES in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD JULY 23, 2001, LAMBROS' RESPONSE TO GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT HERE IN PDF.

15. This space is reserved for the "JUDGMENT" in Criminal No. 4-89-82, District Court, by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.

OFFICE OF LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minnesota Judicial Center, 25 Constitution Avenue, Suite 105, St. Paul,
Minnesota 55155-1500. Tel. (651) 296-3952; Toll-Free No. 1-800-657-3601;
Fax (651) 297-5801; Web site:
www.courts.state.mn.us/Iprb

The Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility for the State of Minnesota has jurisdiction over all attorneys practicing law within the State of Minnesota.

1. All attorneys, by their very admission, agree whether knowingly or not, to subscribe to the CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY as adopted by the American Bar Association as well as the ethical considerations.

2. The functions of the Canons, the Ethical Considerations and the DISCIPLINARY RULES are discussed in the Preliminary Statement of the Code which states that: "The Canons are statements of axiomatic norms, expressing in general terms the standards of professional conduct EXPECTED of lawyers in their relationships with the public, with the legal system, and with the legal profession. They embody the general concepts from which the Ethical Considerations and the Disciplinary Rules are derived. The Ethical Considerations are aspirational in character and represent the objectives toward which every member of the profession should strive. They constitute a body of principles upon which the lawyer can rely for guidance in many specific situations. The DISCIPLINARY RULES, UNLIKE THE ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS, ARE MANDATORY IN CHARACTER. The Disciplinary Rules state the minimum level of conduct below which no lawyer can fall without being subject to disciplinary action. . . . . An ENFORCING AGENCY, in applying the Disciplinary Rules, may find interpretive guidance in the basic principles embodied in the Canons and in the objectives reflected in the Ethical Considerations." Quoting, HANDELMAN vs. WEISS, 368 F.Supp 258, 262 Foot Note 6 (S.D.NY 1973).

3. The U.S. Supreme Court has held, "It would verge on INCOMPETENCE for a lawyer to file an initial pleading without RESEARCHING SUCH ISSUES AS JURISDICTION, venue, standing, exhaustion of remedies, proper parties plaintiff and defendant and TYPES OF RELIEF AVAILABLE. MOST IMPORTANTLY, OF COURSE A LAWYER MUST KNOW THE LAW IN ORDER TO DETERMINE WHETHER A COLORABLE CLAIM EXISTS, and if so, what facts are necessary to state a cause of action." See, BOUNDS vs. SMITH, 430 U.S. 817, 825, 52 L.Ed.2d 72, 81, 97 S.Ct. 1491 (1977).

The following documents have been filed with the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility for the State of Minnesota in this action:

October 30, 2001, Lambros letter to the OFFICE OF LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY in St. Paul, Minnesota. This letter is a COMPLAINT against Minnesota Attorneys: a) COLIA F. CEISEL; b) DOUGLAS PETERSON; and c) DAVID L. LILLEHAUG, in allowing LAMBROS to be RESENTENCED on February 10, 1997, before the Honorable Judge Robert G. RENNER. This letter is two (2) pages in length with three (3) pages of exhibits. Therefore, a TOTAL OF FIVE (5) PAGES in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 30, 2001, LETTER TO OFFICE OF LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY HERE IN PDF.

November 21, 2001, letter from Edward J. Cleary, Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, State of Minnesota, DECISION NOT TO INVESTIGATE the October 30, 2001, COMPLAINT against Attorney DOUGLAS R. PETERSON. This document is two (2) pages in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 21, 2001 LETTER AS TO ATTORNEY DOUGLAS R. PETERSON HERE IN PDF.

November 21, 2001, letter from Edward J. Cleary, Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, State of Minnesota, DECISION NOT TO INVESTIGATE the October 30, 2001, COMPLAINT against Attorney DAVID L. LILLEHAUG. This document is two (2) pages in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 21, 2001 LETTER AS TO ATTORNEY DAVID L. LILLEHAUG HERE IN PDF.

November 26, 2001, letter from Edward J. Cleary, Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, State of Minnesota, to Lambros. DECISION NOT TO INVESTIGATE the October 30, 2001, COMPLAINT against Attorney COLIA F. CEISEL. This document is two (2) pages in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 26, 2001 LETTER AS TO ATTORNEY COLIA F. CEISEL HERE IN PDF.

November 28, 2001, LETTER OF APPEAL from Lambros to Edward J. Cleary, Office Of Lawyers Professional Responsibility against Attorneys DAVID L. LILLEHAUG and DOUGLAS R. PETERSON. This document is twelve (12) pages in length in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. (Pages hand-numbered I thru 12 in lower right corner to assist you.)

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 28, 2001 APPEAL LETTER AGAINST ATTORNEYS LILLEHAUG AND PETERSON HERE IN PDF.

December 03, 2001, LETTER OF APPEAL from Lambros to Edward J. Cleary, Office Of Lawyers Professional Responsibility against Attorney COLIA F. CEISEL. This document is four (4) pages in length in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. (Pages hand-numbered 1 thru 4 in lower right corner to assist you.)

DOWNLOAD DECEMBER 03, 2001 APPEAL LETTER AGAINST ATTORNEY CEISEL HERE IN PDF.

January 14, 2002, letters, three (3) letters, from Attorney Timothy J. Gephart, as to his review pursuant to the Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility as to LAMBROS' complaint dated October 30, 2001, as to the actions of Attorney Colia F. Ceisel, Attorney Douglas R. Peterson, and Attorney David L. Lillehaug of Minnesota. Attorney Gephart approved the Director's disposition that no sanctions would be taken against Attorney's CEISEL, PETERSON, or LILLEHAUG. The full history, including the information offered to the Minnesota Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board, is available within the January 02, 2002, "MOTION TO DISCLOSE CURRENT INVESTIGATION BY THE MINNESOTA OFFICE OF LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY" that is a within this section. The three (3) letters are 3 pages in length and being offered in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD JANUARY 14, 2002, LETTERS FROM MINNESOTA LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD HERE IN PDF.

February 15, 2002, Lambros' FILING OF COMPLAINT against Minnesota Attorneys PETER J. THOMPSON, JOSEPH T. WALBRAN, and ROBERT G. RENNER, to Edward J. Cleary, Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, St. Paul, Minnesota. This document is twenty-nine (29) pages in length including exhibits in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE. (Pages are hand numbered 1 thru 29 in lower right corner to assist you.)

DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 15, 2002 C0MPLAINT AGAINST ATTORNEYS THOMPSON, WALBRAN, AND RENNER HERE IN PDF.

April 12, 2002, letter from Edward J. Cleary, Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, State of Minnesota. DECISION NOT TO INVESTIGATE Lambros' February 15, 2002, COMPLAINT against Attorney PETER J. THOMPSON. This document is two (2) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD APRIL 12, 2002 LETTER AS TO ATTORNEY PETER J. THOMPSON HERE IN PDF.

April 12, 2002, letter from Edward J. Cleary, Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, State of Minnesota. DECISION NOT TO INVESTIGATE Lambros' February 15, 2002, COMPLAINT against Attorney JOSEPH T. WALBRAN. This document is two (2) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD APRIL 12, 2002 LETTER AS TO ATTORNEY JOSEPH T. WALBRAN HERE IN PDF.

April 20, 2002, Lambros' LETTER OF APPEAL as to the April 12, 2002, DECISIONS NOT TO INVESTIGATE from Edward J. Cleary, Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, State of Minnesota regarding Attorneys PETER J. THOMPSON and JOSEPH T. WALBRAN. The letter of appeal is 12 total pages including exhibits in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD APRIL 20, 2002, LETTER OF APPEAL AS TO ATTORNEY TH0MPSON AND WALBRAN HERE IN PDF.

May 08, 2002, letter from Attorney Wallace Neal, Designated Board Member for the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, State of Minnesota, to Lambros affirming the Director's determination that discipline IS NOT warranted for Attorney Peter J. Thompson. This letter is one page in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD MAY 08, 2002 LETTER FROM ATTORNEY NEAL REGARDING PETER J. THOMPSON HERE IN PDF.

May 08, 2002, letter from Attorney Wallace Neal, Designated Board Member for the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, State of Minnesota, to Lambros affirming the Director's determination that discipline IS NOT warranted for Attorney Joseph T. Walbran. This letter is one page in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD MAY 08, 2002, LETTER FROM ATTORNEY NEAL REGARDING JOSEPH T. WALBRAN HERE IN PDF.

May 14, 2002, letter from Attorney Cassie Hanson, Assistant Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, State of Minnesota, to Lambros as to the reasons a complaint file was not opened against Minnesota Attorney Robert G. Renner in this action. This letter is one page in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD MAY 14, 2002, LETTER FROM ATTORNEY CASSIE HANSON REGARDING ROBERT G. RENNER HERE IN PDF.

DECEMBER 15, 2003, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT RULES THAT DISTRICT COURT'S CAN NOT RECHARACTERIZE PRO SE LITIGANT'S MOTIONS, AS WAS DONE IN THE CASE OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS ON FEBRUARY 10, 1997, BY JUDGE ROBERT G. RENNER. CASTRO vs. UNITED STATES, 157 L.Ed.2d 778, 124 S.Ct. 786 (2003). LAMBROS REQUESTS DISTRICT COURT TO VACATE SENTENCE ON SEPTEMBER 07, 2004.

September 07, 2004, "MOTION TO VACATE FEBRUARY 10, 1997, JUDGMENT DUE TO INTERVENING CHANGE IN CONTROLLING LAW, CASTRO vs. U.S., 157 L.Ed.2d 778 (December 15, 2003), UNDER ANY ONE OF THREE SEPARATE SUBSECTIONS OF FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(b) - SECTIONS ONE (1), FIVE (5), AND SIX (6)." This document is a total of sixty-four (64) pages including cover letter to clerk of the court, main pleading and exhibits in LAMBROS vs. U.S., Criminal No. 4-89-82(05). This motion offers the complete sentencing transcript of the February 10, 1997 resentencing of John G. Lambros as Exhibit C. The sentencing transcript of February 10, 1997 offers an excellent overview as to the bias of Judge Robert C. Renner towards Lambros. Lambros requested Judge Renner several times for a ruling on the GENERAL JURY VERDICT issue which was required by the Eighth Circuit, U.S. vs. OWENS, 904 F.2d 411, 414415 (8th Cir. 1990), but Judge Renner refused due to the fact he could only sentence Lambros to no more than five (5) years. See pages five thru nine in the main pleading. This document is in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD SEPTEMBER 07, 2004, MOTION TO VACATE FEBRUARY 10, 1997 JUDCMENT HERE IN PDF.

CASTRO vs. UNITED STATES, 157 L.Ed.2d 778, 124 S.Ct. 786 (December 15, 2003). The CASTRO decision is being offered in PDF FORMAT, seven (7) pages. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD CASTRO vs. U.S., 157 L.Ed.2d 778 (2003) HERE IN PDF.

November 03, 2004, Government's "OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO VACATE FEBRUARY 10, 1997 JUDGMENT," in LAMBROS vs. USA, No. 4-89-82(5)(DSD), by Thomas B. Heffelfinger and Jeffrey S. Paulsen. Of interest is the governments' statement, Castro does not help Lambros as Castro only applies to pro se petitioners. Lambros was represented by an attorney even though Lambros filed the Rule 33 motions himself. This motion is a total of ten (10) pages including cover letter and exhibits. This PDF FORMAT document requires ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 03, 2004 "OPPOSIITON OF USA TO FEBRUARY 10, 1997 JUDGMENT HERE IN PDF.

November 15, 2004, Filed November 16, 2004, ORDER, by Judge David S. Doty, in LAMBROS vs. USA, No. 4-89-82(5) (US) (DSD). The court denied Lambros' motion, stating "Because he was represented by counsel and thus in the same position as other litigants who rely on their attorney,' defendant was not entitled to a legal explanation from the court." Remember Lambros filed all of his sentencing motions and Rule 33 motions himself and the resentencing court turned sentencing motions and/or issues into a Title 28 U.S.C. 2255 Motion illegally. This ORDER from the court is four (4) pages in length. This PDF FORMAT document requires ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOU COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 16, 2004, ORDER BY JUDGE DAVID S. DOTY HERE IN PDF.

November 23, 2004, MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT OF THIS COURT'S ORDER DATED NOVEMBER 15, 2004, FILED NOVEMBER 16, 2004, PURSUANT TO RULE 59(e) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, in LAMBROS vs. USA, No. 4-89-82(5)(DSD). This motion included MOTIONS DATED NOVEMBER 16, 2004 DUE TO LOCK-DOWN AT LEAVENWORTH. The following November 16, 2004 Motions attached are: (1) MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL; (2) MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF RECORDS; (3) MOVANT LAMBROS' TRAVERSE RESPONSE TO OPPOSITION TO THE UNITED STATES TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO VACATE FEBRUARY 10, 1997 JUDGMENT, DATED NOVEMBER 03, 2004. This PDF DOCUMENT including the cover letter to the clerk and all motions are twenty-seven (27) pages in length and the one download is numbered 1 thru 27 in the lower right hand corner to assist all readers in maintaining order within the documents. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 23, 2004, RULE 59(e) MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT HERE IN PDF.

January 06, 2005, MOTION TO CLARIFY THAT LAMBROS WAS PROCEEDING PRO SE ON FEBRUARY 10, 1997, WHEN THE DISTRICT COURT WRONGLY CONVERTED HIS FORTY (40) MOTIONS TO A 28 U.S.C. 2255 HABEAS PETITION WITHOUT NOTICE OR OPPORTUNITY TO ARGUE, MODIFY, OR WITHDRAW, PURSUANT TO CASTRO vs. UNITED STATES, 157 LEd.2d 778 (2003), in LAMBROS vs. USA, File No. 4-89-82(5)(DSD). This PDF DOCUMENT including the cover letter to the clerk and exhibits is twenty-two (22) pages in length. The document is hand-numbered in the lower right hand corner to assist the reader in maintaining order within the document. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD JANUARY 06, 2005 MOTION TO CLARIFY, HERE IN PDF.

July 11, 2005, ORDER, by Judge David S. Doty, in USA vs. LAMBROS, Criminal No. 4-89-82(5). The court denies Lambros' MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND, Motion for Appointment of Counsel and Motion for production of documents. NOTE: For some reason the court makes a ruling as to Lambros' RULE 60(b) MOTION AS TO CRAWFORD vs. WASHINGTON, which is currently in front of the Eighth Circuit. This document is four (4) pages in length and in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD JULY 11, 2005, ORDER, HERE IN PDF.

July 28, 2005, NOTICE OF APPEAL and MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY, in LAMBROS vs. USA, Criminal No. 4-89-82(5)(DSD). Under the standards of adjudication for a COA, Lambros' should be granted a COA by the district court as the district court denied Lambros his RULE 60(b) due to law that is not valid. The Court basically stated CASTRO does not apply to Lambros because Lambros was represented by an attorney. The court sited a case that relied on COMMON LAW HAVING BEEN INVENTED IN HOUSTON vs. LACK. Rule 4 was rewritten in 1993 and revised in 1998. REMEMBER: The Supreme Court in CASTRO did not expressly limit CASTRO's application to cases involving unrepresented prisoners. This motion is short but to the point in proving Lambros should be given a 2255 motion. This PDF FORMATTED document is twenty-one (21) pages in length including cover letter and exhibits and is numbered in the lower right hand corner to assist readers. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD JULY 28, 2005, NOTICE OF APPEAL AND COA, HERE IN PDF.

August 16, 2005, ORDER, by Judge David S. Doty, in USA vs. LAMBROS, Criminal No. 4-89-82(5)(DSD). The Court denied Lambros' application for a certificate of appealability. NOTE: The court states Lambros has not made a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" as required by 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). This is somewhat strange as the United States Constitution offers everyone the right for a WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, Art. 1, 9, cl. 2. This document is one (1) page in length and in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD AUGUST 16, 2005, ORDER, HERE IN PDF.

August 30, 2005, "MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY (COA) BY THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS," in LAMBROS vs. USA, No. 05-3383, Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals filing. The standards for the court in granting a COA, is the violation of a constitutional law. Lambros again has argued that the District court SUSPENDED HIS RIGHT TO FILE HIS FIRST WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, as guaranteed within the United States Constitution, Art. 1, 9, cl.2. This document is eight (8) pages in length including cover letter with no exhibits in PDF FORMAT. Exhibit A can be downloaded above. See, July 28, 2005, NOTICE OF APPEAL and MOTION FOR COA. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD AUGUST 30, 2005, COA TO 8th CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, HERE IN PDF.

November 1, 2005, JUDGMENT by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in USA vs. LAMBROS, No. 05-3383. Circuit Court Judges RILEY, FAGG, and GRUENDER DENIED Lambros' August 30, 2005, application for a certificate of appealability. Lambros believes he met all standard for the granting of a certificate of appealability. This document is one (1) page in length and in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 1, 2005, JUDGMENT BY 8th CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, HERE IN PDF.

November 09, 2005, "PETITION FOR REHEARING AND/OR PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC. FRAP 40," in USA vs. LAMBROS, No. 05-3383, Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals filing. Lambros requests the appeals court to reconsider the November 1, 2005, denial of his certificate of appealability in this action. THIS FILING OFFERS COPY OF THE LEGAL CASES THAT UNDERMINED THE COURT'S NOVEMBER 1, 2005 JUDGMENT. This PDF FORMATTED document is twenty-two (22) pages in length including the cover letter and exhibits and is numbered in the lower right hand corner to assist readers. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 09, 2005, PETITION FOR REHEARING, HERE IN PDF.

December 06, 2005, "CITATION OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY - FRAP 28(j)", in USA vs. LAMBROS, No. 05-3383, Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals filing. Lambros requests the Eighth Circuit to consider the September 06, 2005, holding by the Third Circuit which applied CASTRO vs. U.S., RETROACTIVELY. See, IN RE WAGNER, 421 F.3d 275 (2005). There is no reason for the Eighth Circuit not to grant Lambros a COA at this point. This PDF FORMATTED document is three (3) pages in length with exhibit. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD DECEMBER 6, 2005, "CITATION OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY - FRAP 28(j), HERE IN PDF.

December 15, 2005, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, USA vs. LAMBROS, No. 05-3383, ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND FOR REHEARING EN BANC. If you would like a copy go to the following WRIT OF CERTIORARI, EXHIBIT E.

February 28, 2006, Filed March 02, 2006, WRIT OF CERTIORARI in JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS vs. UNITED STATES, NO. 05-9611. Lambros is requesting the Supreme Court to rule CASTRO vs. U.S., 157 L.Ed.2d 778 (2003) retroactive and whether the court of appeals failed to apply any of the considerations set out in CASTRO to Lambros to determine whether such a dismissal precluded an unconstitutional suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus, as embodied within the U.S. Constitution, Art. 1, 9, cl. 2. This PDF FORMATTED document is seventy-nine (79) pages in length with exhibits. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 28, 2006, CASTRO vs. USA, "WRIT OF CERTIORARI" - HERE IN PDF.

April 17, 2006, ORDER from U.S. Supreme Court in LAMBROS vs. USA, No. 05-9611, as to the DENIAL of Lambros' WRIT OF CERTIORARI, as to the Courts ruling in CASTRO vs. U.S., 157 L.Ed.2d 778 (2003) retroactivity. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT IN PDF FORMAT.

MARCH 08, 2004, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT RULES THAT "OUT-OF-COURT STATEMENTS CAN NOT BE ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE WHEN NOT SUBJECT TO CROSS MAMINATION", AS WAS DONE IN THE CASE OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS DURING HIS JURY TRIAL. CRAWFORD vs. WASHINGTON, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). LAMBROS REQUESTS DISTRICT COURT TO VACATE SENTENCE ON FEBRUARY 15, 2005.

February 15, 2005, "MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT OR ORDER, DUE TO INTERVENING CHANGE IN CONTROLLING LAW, CRAWFORD vs. WASHINGTON, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (March 08, 2004), UNDER ANY ONE OF THREE SEPARATE SUBSECTIONS OF FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(b) - SECTIONS ONE (1), FIVE (5), AND SIX (6)." This document is a total of twenty-two (22) pages including cover-letter to clerk of the court, main pleading and exhibits in LAMBROS vs. USA, Criminal No. 4-89-82(05), District of Minnesota. Lambros' attorney was not allowed to interview or cross-examine the out-of-court statements entered into evidence that where testimonial in nature by DONALD HENDRICKSON (paid government informant), ROGER LEWIS, REBECCA LEWIS, and DAVID PAGEL (Past President of First Preferred Investments, 4000 IDS Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, past employer of John G. Lambros). This document is in PDF FORMAT. YOUR MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 15, 2005, MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT HERE IN PDF.

April 20, 2005, "OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE A SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255." This document has been filed with the EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, LAMBROS vs. USA No. 05-1992. PROBLEM: Lambros filed his Rule 60(b) motion with the district court and DID NOT request permission to file a second or successive 2255. Also, the district court never ruled on Lambros' RULE 60(b) motion and Lambros never gave permission to the clerk to transfer his motion to the Eighth Circuit. Lambros believes the Clerk of the Court is in violation of CRIMINAL STATUTES: Title 18 U.S.C. Sections 2076 and 2071. This document is a total of four (4) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD APRIL 20, 2005, GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO CRAWFORD vs. WASHINGTON HERE IN PDF.

April 28, 2005, "PETITIONER LAMBROS' RESPONSE TO GOVERNMENT'S APRIL 20, 2005 OPPOSITION," in LAMBROS vs. USA, No. 05-1992, Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. This motion offers an excellent overview as to Lambros' attempt to have the clerks from the district court and the Eighth Circuit return Lambros' RULE 60(b) motion back to the district court for a ruling. This document is a total of eight (8) pages including the cover letter and exhibit and the pages are hand-numbered on the lower right hand corner of each page to assist the reader. This document is in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD APRIL 28, 2005, LAMBROS RESPONSE TO CRAWFORD ISSUE HERE IN PDF.

June 2, 2005, Lambros' letter to the Clerk for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the EIGHTH CIRCUIT, in LAMBROS vs. USA, No. 05-1992. This letter states to the Clerk for the EIGHTH CIRCUIT that Lambros' RULE 60(b) MOTION was NEVER TRANSFERRED TO THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT BY THE DISTRICT COURT, as per the June 24, 2005 letter from Mary Kay Furchner, Criminal Docket Supervisor for the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota which is attached as an exhibit. HOW DID THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT RECEIVE JURISDICTION??????? This one (1) page letter is a total of four (4) pages including exhibits and is numbered in the lower right hand corner to assist the reader. This document is in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT..
DOWNLOAD JUNE 2, 2005 LAMBROS LETTER TO CLERK FOR EIGHTH CIRCUIT HERE IN PDF.

JANUARY 12, 2005, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT RULES THAT "SENTENCING
GUIDELINES TO BE VIOLATIVE OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION
IN THAT IT CONFLICTS WITH AN ACCUSED'S RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL." LAMBROS WAS
SENTENCED TO AN ENHANCED SENTENCE OF THIRTY (30) YEARS ON TWO (2) COUNTS UNDER
THE GUIDELINES AND ONLY TO TEN (10) YEARS ON TWO (2) COUNTS NOT UNDER THE
GUIDELINES. LAMBROS REQUESTS DISTRICT COURT TO VACATE HIS SENTENCES UNDER
UNITED STATES vs. BOOKER, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

DOWNLOAD SEPTEMBER 27, 2005, U.S. vs. BOOKER MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT, HERE IN PDF.

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUESTS

GOVERNMENT INFORMANTS, SNITCHES, RATS, FINK, STOOL PIGEON

ROGER LEWIS and REBECCA LEWIS: Both Roger and Rebecca Lewis who lived in Southern Minnesota from Austin to Rochester, Minnesota work for the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) and the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). Attached for your review are the trial transcripts from John Gregory Lambros' criminal action where Agent James Hessel of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension testifies as to the employment of both Roger and Rebecca Lewis. It is also believed that Roger Lewis has been employed by U.S. Military Intelligence due to possible contracting from the Tomah, Wisconsin facility. This document contains pages 673 thru 685 from the trial transcript and is presented within seven (7) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD ROGER LEWIS AND REBECCA LEWIS INFORMATION HERE IN PDF.

DONALD HENDRICKSON FROM DULUTH, MINNESOTA: Donald Hendrickson works for the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) and the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) as a full time paid informant. It appears that Donald Hendrickson actively works throughout Minnesota and Florida as a paid bounty hunter lying and stealing for the BCA and DEA. Please note that Donald Hendrickson has served time in prison and within a mental institution, specifically the Anoka Regional Treatment Center, and is dangerous. This document contains pages 529 thru 533 and pages 639 thru 642 from the trial transcript. This document contains nine (9) pages in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.
DOWNLOAD DONALD HENDRICKSON FROM DULUTH, INFORMATION HERE IN PDF.

STATE OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA "DEPARTMENT OF STATE."

COUNSELOR RELATIONS

October 24 1995 letter from Lambros to the Ambassador from Brazil about Brazilian breaches of the extradition treaty between the United States and Brazil.

THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

June 26, 1996 letter from Lambros to a Special Agent for the FBI regarding his interview of Lambros at USP Leavenworth, and transmitting information about his torture in Brazil.

CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION OF THE TORTURE OF JOHN LAMBROS

May 20, 1996 letter from U.S. Senator Jesse Helms to Lambros confirming that he is working on the case and saying, "I contacted the proper authorities of the Bureau of Prisons and in doing so, I have requested their careful attention and consideration of the situation."
June 6, 1996 letter from Lambros to U.S. Senator Jesse Helms and the Foreign Relations Committee thanking Senator Helms for his interest and transmitting additional information about Lambros's treatment while being held by the government of Brazil.
July 1, 1996 letter from Lambros to U.S. Senator Jesse Helms, the Foreign Relations Committee, and others about getting the testimony of foreign nationals for the Lambros re-sentencing hearing.
July 4, 1996 letter from Lambros to U.S. Senator Jesse Helms , the Foreign Relations Committee, and others regarding the re-sentencing of Lambros.

$500 BILLION COMMERCIAL LIEN DEFAULTED BY FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL AND OTHERS. THE STATE OF MINNESOTA CONSTITUTION ARTICLE I, SECTION 8 GUARANTEES "EVERY PERSON IS ENTITLED TO A CERTAIN REMEDY IN THE LAWS FOR ALL INJURIES OR WRONGS WHICH HE MAY RECEIVE TO HIS PERSON, PROPERTY, OR CHARACTER . . ."

The 1988 new constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil (Republica Federative do Brasil) clearly states within Title II, Fundamental Rights and Guarantees, Chapter I, Individual and Collective Rights and Duties, ARTICLE 5:

Article 5. - All persons are equal before the law, without any distinction whatsoever, and Brazilians and foreigners resident in Brazil are assured of inviolability of the right to life, to liberty, to quality, to security and to property, on the following terms:

III: no one shall be submitted to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment;

IV: the expression of thought is free, and anonymity is forbidden;

V: the right to answer is ensured, in proportion to the offense, besides compensation for property or moral damages or damages to the image;

X: the privacy, private life, honor and image of person are inviolable, and the right to COMPENSATION for property or moral damages resulting from the violation thereof is ensured;

XXXIX: there is no crime without a previous law which defines it, nor is there any punishment without a previous legal imposition;

XL: THE PENAL LAW SHALL NOT BE RETROACTIVE, EXCEPT TO THE BENEFIT OF THE DEFENDANT; (How can the Treaty of Extradition Between the United States of America and the United States of Brazil, signed on January 13, 1961, be legal?)

XLI: the law shall punish any discrimination against fundamental rights and liberties;

XLVII: there shall be NO SENTENCE: b) of life imprisonment; e) which is cruel.

IXXIV: the State shall provide full and gratuitous legal assistance to whoever proves not to have sufficient funds;

LXXV: THE STATE SHALL INDEMNIFY A PERSON CONVICTED BY A JUDICIAL ERROR, AND ALSO A CONVICT WHO REMAINS IMPRISONED LONGER THU THE PERIOD ESTABLISHED IN THE SENTENCE;

LXXVII: Paragraph 2. - The rights and guarantees established in this Constitution DO NOT PRECLUDE others arising out of the regime and the principles adopted by it, or out of INTERNATIONAL TREATIES TO WHICH THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL IS A PARTY.

DOWNLOAD ARTICLE 5 OF THE 1988 CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL HERE IN PDF.

On December 17, 1997, John Gregory Lambros served FINAL NOTICE FOR PAYMENT in LAMBROS vs. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, et al. in the amount exceeding $500 BILLION. The following lien debtors have defaulted: FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL; FERNANDO HENRIQUE CARDOSO; CATHOLIC CARDEAL DOM JOSE FREIRO FALCAO; LUIZ CARLOS ANDREACI; FRANCESCO TOSCANINO: ITAMAR FRANCO; FERNANDO COLLOR de MELLO; and all persons connected with this action. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit APPROVED AND ALLOWED THE USE OF THE "COMMON LAW LIEN" that was filed in the deed records office in Denton, Texas against a criminal investigator with the Criminal Investigation Division of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). See, U.S. vs. REEVES, 752 F.2d 995 (5th Cir. 1985). When, as a practical matter, legal remedy may be inadequate because it operates too slowly, self-help remedy provided by lien is allowable under Illinois law. See, LAKE RIVER CORP. vs. CARBORUNDUN CO., 769 F.2d 1284 (7th Cir. 1985). Please review the Final Notice for Payment as to the history of this action and documents filed. The following Brazilian Supreme Court Justices (1992) supported the massive cover-up of authorized slavery and torture to John Gregory Lambros: MARCO AURELIO; LLMAR GALVAO; CELSO de MELLO; SEPULVEDA PERTENCE; PAULO BROSSARD; SYDNEY SANCHES; CARLOS VELLOSO; NERI da SILVEIRA; OCTAVIO GALLOTI; CELIO BORJA; MOREIRA ALVES; and MAURICO CORREA. This document is a total of fifty-nine (59) pages including the certificate of service and exhibits in PDF FORMAT Please note all pages are hand-numbered in the lower right corner to assure order. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD DECEMBER 17, 1997, FINAL NOTICE OF COMMERCIAL LIEN AGAINST BRAZIL HERE IN PDF.

December 12, 1996 90 Day Notice to comply with the commercial lien that has been filed in Ramsey County, Minnesota, against the government of Brazil and others by John Gregory Lambros, with six attachments.
1996 Public Notice of the lien that has been filed in Ramsey County, Minnesota, against the government of Brazil and others by John Gregory Lambros

WOULD YOU LIKE TO LEARN MORE ABOUT "COMMERCIAL LIENS"? Please review the following article by Alfred Adask, "COMMERCIAL LIEN STRATEGY, A PRESIDENTIAL OPINION." This article appeared in the AntiShyster Magazine, Volume 3, No. 1, Jan./Feb. 1993.

The following major credit bureaus have been placed on notice as to the above commercial lien filed by Lambros against Brazil et al.: (1) Equifax www.equifax.com; (2) Experian www.experian.com; and (3) TransUnion www.transunion.com. Boycott Brazil strongly suggests checking the credit references of ALL BRAZILIAN'S before doing business with them, as most Brazilian's do not pay promptly and have poor payment history. D&B (www.dnb.com) offers a number of products for checking the risk in doing business with Brazilian companies. For instantaneous results, check our D&B's Global DecisionMaker service.

LARGE AWARDS AGAINST FOREIGN COUNTRIES FOR TORTURE AND HOSTAGE TAKING

The following lawsuits by Americans citizens that ended in large awards against foreign countries:

a. ANDERSON vs. THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., 90 F.Supp.2d 107 (D.D.C. 2000). This was the second-largest lawsuit award in 2000, $341.7 million verdict against the Islamic Republic of Iran. Former Associated Press reporter Terry Anderson, whom Iranian-sponsored militants held hostage in Lebanon for seven years won. American law allows Anderson to collect a portion of the judgment from Iranian assets seized and held by the United States.

b. EISENFELD vs. THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Cite as: 2000 WL 1918779 (D.D.C. July 11, 2000). On February 25, 1996, Eisenfeld and Duker boarded a bus in Jerusalem to journey to the Archeological dig at Petra, Jordan. The Hamas claimed credit for the bombing of the bus the two where riding in. The court awarded over $300 million in punitive damages.

c. November 20, 2005, the STAR TRIBUNE reported that a federal jury in Memphis, Tennessee found former Colonel Nicolas Carranza from El Salvador responsible for crimes against humanity during that country's civil war in the 1980's and ordered him to pay six (6) million dollars in damages. The nine-person jury found CARRANZA had "COMMAND RESPONSIBILITY" for the torture of a Salvadoran man who was forced to confess falsely to the 1983 killing of a U.S. Military adviser, Lt. Cmdr. Albert Schaufelberger.

d. POSSIBLE LAWSUIT: December 11, 2005, the STAR TRIBUNE reported that two (2) Brazilian men were convicted of killing an AMERICAN NUN who spent decades trying to save the Amazon rain forest. This appears to be a typical land-related killing. Rayfran das Neves Salas, who shot Dorothy Stang, 73, got 27 years in prison. Clodoaldo Carlos Batista was sentenced to 17 years in prison.

: www.PetitionOnline.com/jlambros/petition.html

Support Boycott Brazil by shopping at Amazon.com!
Click the logo to shop

In Association with Amazon.com

POST FREE CLASSIFIED ADS, BUSINESS DIRECTORY LISTING AND YELLOW PAGE LISTING FOR YOUR BUSINESS - WITHIN 50 COUNTRIES. SEARCHING FOR A SPECIAL ITEM? SEARCH OVER 35 MILLION CLASSIFIED ADS WITH OVER 500,000 NEW ADS DAILY!!! Visite: www.NoPayClassifieds.com.

Buy tickets and make reservations at the Internet's largest travel site!

Return to top of index

THE MEDICAL CONDITION OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS

MRI TESTING OF LAMBROS BY MOBILE TECHNOLOGY INC. [MTI]

January 19, 1994 report of the Competency Evaluation of John Gregory Lambros conducted by psychologist Kenneth J. Criqui. Please note that Dr. Criqui stated within his January 19, 1994, "ADDENDUM TO COMPETENCY EVALUATION JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS," on Page 2, "The government could not have done a better job of instilling fear and paranoia in Mr. Lambros had they hired a psychiatrist to plan this out. First Mr. Lambros was sent to FMC Rochester. The FIRST X-RAY SHOWED SOMETHING, AND WHILE THE SECOND SHOWED NOTHING, IT IS PLAIN AND EVIDENT THAT THE SECOND X-RAY WAS TAKEN AT A DIFFERENT INTENSITY SETTING AND IS THEREFORE QUITE INVALID TO COMPARE TO THE FIRST. HOW BETTER TO MAKE THE SUBJECT THINK THAT THE GOVERNMENT IS JUST INVOLVED IN "ANOTHER ONE OF ITS COVER-UPS'?."

RESEARCH REGARDING MIND CONTROL

ARE BRAZILIAN'S RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLANTING JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS?

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

  1. January 3, 1995 letter from Lambros to the FCC
  2. April 8, 1995 letter from Lambros to the FCC

OTHER VICTIMS OF ELECTRONIC MIND CONTROL

JOHN FINCH - VICTIM AND ACTIVIST - Australia

April 23, 2008 letter from John Finch to John G. Lambros offering a list of good websites on mind control and victim lists of mind control. The following websites offer CASE SUMMARIES (over 460 on April 22, 2008) and TECHNICAL INFORMATION on mind control:
DOWNLOAD APRIL 23, 2008 FINCH LETTER HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

FOR TECHNICAL INFORMATION ON MIND CONTROL:

www.angelfire.com/or/mctrl/akwei.html
www.myspace.com/marsboy683

LIST OF VICTIM CASE SUMMARIES (over 460 on April 22, 2008):
www.organizedcrimewaves.com
www.9-11themotherofallblackoperations.blogspot.com
www.youtube.com/1pat21
www.davidicke.com

DATA BASE OF VICTIMS OF MIND CONTROL, RADIO-IMPLANTS, OR CIA TRACKING CHIPS

  1. January 18, 1996 National Legal Professional Associations [NLPA] MEMORANDUM to "All Interested Counsel and Their Clients" requesting information to start a data base of victims of Mind Control, Radio-implants, and CIA Tracking Chips. NLPA is a nationally renown group of legal research professional and legal assistants that assist both private attorneys and public defenders in seeking post-conviction and other relief for their clients in the federal prison system.
  2. July 1, 1998 MEMORANDUM from the U.S. and London, England offices of National Legal Professional Associates, as to the illegal extradition of John Gregory Lambros from Brazil to the State of Minnesota due to the jurisdictional aspect of interstate commerce that do not cover FEDERAL CRIMES.

BRIAN WRONGE, IMPLANT VICTIM

  1. December 15 - 21, 1993, article from THE CITY SUN newspaper, Brooklyn, New York, by Editor Maitefa Angaza, entitled "SCI-FACT -- NOT FICTION: High-Tech Slavery Is Here." The article offers an excellent X-Ray, showing the IMPLANTS IN BRIAN WRONGE'S HEAD. Surgeons at Billy Seaton Hospital in Staten Island illegally placed the implants within the head and body of Wronge in October 1987.
    DOWNLOAD THE CITY SUN ARTICLE ON BRIAN WRONGE SHOWING IMPLANTS HERE IN PDF.
  2. Article entitled Wronge Revisited: Update on an Implant Victim's Case, The City Sun Newspaper, New York City, Matifa Angaza, Executive Editor
  3. Article entitled Implant Victim Refused Help by Humanitarian Physicians, The City Sun Newspaper, New York City, Roger Hutcheonson, Reporter

GEORGE FARQUHAR, IMPLANT-MIND CONTROL VICTIM

  1. George Farquhar is the director of the PROJECT FREEDOM NETWORK and a mind control victim. Some of the symptoms Mr. Farquhar experiences are nervousness and irritable physical sensations throughout his body, difficulty in thinking clearly, headaches, loud snapping noises in his head, short-term memory loss, disordered thought patterns, lethargy, nausea and insomnia. In 1998, George decided to dedicate his life to exposing the intelligence agencies that use mind control to control humans. Please contact George and review his web site for information and a copy of his publication, "REMOTE MIND CONTROL WEAPONS USED BY THE MIND CONTROL POLICE." Email: pro_freedom_uk@yahoo.com
    Web site: http://www.pro-freedom.co.uk. CLICK HERE TO GO DIRECTLY TO THE PROJECT FREEDOM NETWORK WEB SITE.
  2. Part I of the PROJECT FREEDOM NETWORK REMOTE MIND CONTROL WEAPONS web site was downloaded for your convenience and review. The following 23 articles, web pages, represent 184 printed pages of evidence as to the use of remote mind control weapons used by global intelligence agencies against humanity. Click here to review these articles.

IKE ATKINS

JOHN GINTER, IMPLANT - MIND CONTROL VICTIM FROM CALIFORNIA

DORAN, IMPLANT VICTIM

FACTS FROM ARTICLES AND BOOKS REGARDING IMPLANT VICTIMS

  1. September 8, 1995 Lambros work up sheet on The CIA Stole My Brain, article in The National Examiner, April 30, 1985 issue
  2. September 10, 1995 Lambros feed back sheet on The CIA Stole My Brain, article in The National Examiner, April 30, 1985 issue
  3. September 8, 1995 Lambros work up sheet on Remove the Alien from My Brain, article in The Weekly World News, November 1, 1994 issue
  4. April 11, 1996 Lambros information sheet about U.S. Government Pine Gap Base in Australia
  5. October 22, 2002, RATS TO THE RESCUE, article which appeared in the NATIONAL ENQUIRER, page 59, as to rats implanted and controlled by humans. Dr. John K. Chapin stated, "It takes about 10 days to train rats to go left or right." Dr. Chapin and an international team of colleagues are performing research at State University of New York laboratory in Brooklyn, N.Y. If rats can be controlled by implants why can't humans?

    DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 22, 2002, ARTICLE ON IMPLANTED RATS HERE IN PDF.

IAN CLARK, IMPLANT VICTIM FROM AUSTRALIA

  1. November 2, 1999 letter from Ian Clark to Lambros as to his increased torture from brain control implants. Please contact Ian Clark via email at: Tortured@unforgettable.com and review his web site at http://www.business.fortunecity.com/bassst/872 that offer photos and x-rays of his implants. Click here to go directly to his site. (Ian Clark's letter is 1 page)

PETER JAMTGAARD, IMPLANT VICTIM FROM KENOSHA, WISCONSIN

  1. May 25, 2003, letter from Peter Jamtgaard to Lambros stating that he was implanted by officials in Oregon City, Oregon. Peter stated, "I briefly remember waking up as something was forced up my right sinus .... I awoke in the morning with five (5) scars on the right side of my head. ... I have x-rays that show foreign objects including the item that was removed .... a note from my doctor ... I am a Graduate of Civil Engineering ..." This letter is one (1) page in PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD PETER JAMTGAARD LETTER IN PDF HERE.

CHERYL WELSH - CITIZENS AGAINST HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE.

  1. Cheryl Welsh is the Director of Citizens Against Human Rights Abuse (C.A.H.R.A.) and the author of the January 1998, U.S. HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE REPORT. Ms. Welsh and members of her organization have identified and networked over 1,000 Mind Control victims globally. Please visit her web site at: www.calweb.com/~welsh/7.htm

ANNIE McKENNA - MIND CONTROL SURVIVOR AND AUTHOR OF "PAPERCLIP DOLLS."

  1. Annie McKenna is a mind control survivor that has written the book "PAPERCLIP DOLLS." McKenna recommends that other mind control survivors contact her and other survivors at her web site: www.paperclipdolls.com
  2. Media Bypass, December 2000, www.4bypass.com published Annie McKenna's article entitled, "HEALING FROM THE HORROR, Mind Control Survivor Finds Healing After the Walls of Amnesia Come Tumbling Down."

LINDA MACDONALD AND LEAST 79 OTHER CANADIAN'S "DE-PATTERNED BY CIA AND CANADIAN GOVERNMENT. SETTLE LAW SUIT IN 1988 & 1992.

  1. Linda MacDonald had her "MIND EMPTIED" in 1963 by the CIA and Canadian government during "de-patterning" experiments in Montreal that took place in the 1950's and 1960's. MacDonald was drugged with assorted medicines, including LSD. Making her sleep 86 days. Given repeated electroshocks and "PSYCHIC DRIVING" - the playing of repeated taped messages 16 hours a day for days on end. In 1992 Ottawa, Justice Minister Kim Campbell decided victims still living would receive $79,000 each for brainwashing and torture. The U.S. Government reached a settlement in 1988, agreeing to pay MacDonald and eight (8) others who sued about $100,000.00. You may review the USA TODAY article entitled, "CANADA SETTLES '63 BRAINWASH CASE" by Robert Davis, on November 19, 1992, one (1) page in PDF. YOU MUST HAVE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

    DOWNLOAD THE DOCUMENT IN PDF.

  2. March 11, 1993, letter from Attorney Jeffrey L. Orren to Attorney Erin Burger, 300-174 Water Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA regarding the LINDA MCDONALD brainwashing case. Attorney Burger represented LINDA MCDONALD in several proceedings. 'This letter is two (2) pages in length and available in PDF format. YOU MUST HAVE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

    DOWNLOAD THE DOCUMENT IN PDF.

THOMAS SAVATORE SAVONA - MIND CONTROL VICTIM FROM NEW YORK

  1. Attached for your review are three (3) letters from Mr. Savona as to his 24/7 torture and brain monitoring by a government agency; a) December 7, 2000; b) February 1, 2001; and c) March 16, 2001. The three letter are a total of six (6) pages and offered as one download. LAMBROS has numbered same in the lower right corner, I thru 6. Mr. Savona is currently incarcerated at the Auburn Correctional Facility, Auburn, New York and would appreciate letters and assistance in establishing a web site as to this research. Please note that Mr. Savona has been in contact with Richard J. Boylan, Judy Wall, and Borderland Science Research Foundation. The three letter are offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

    DOWNLOAD SALVATORE SAVONA LETTER HERE IN PDF.

ALFRED LAMBREMONT WEBRE - STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1977 - MIND CONTROL VICTIM

  1. 1. Attached for your review is the testimony of Dr. Alfred Lambremont Webre, a mind control victim during his research and employment as Senior Policy Analyst at the Center for Study of Social Policy at Stanford Research Institute (now "SRI International", Menlo Park, California). The testimony is offered within Dr. Steven M. Greer's book "DISCLOSURE" on pages 444 thru 447 in PDF FORMAT. This download is a total of five (5) pages. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

    DOWNLOAD ALFRED LAMBREMONT WEBRE TESTIMONY HERE IN PDF.

ANGLE HERNANDEZ - MIND CONTROL VICTIM FROM MEXICO - GIB LEWIS UNIT

  1. Angle Hernandez was part of the REMOTE NEUROLOGICAL MIND CONTROL PROGRAM within the Texas Correctional Facility in Woodville, Texas. The Gib Lewis Unit, P.O. Box 1074, Woodville, Texas 76528 USA has a high-security unit for gang members where scientists perform MIND CONTROL RESEARCH. It is believed that inmates are both implanted and maser technology is being used to transfer thought and manipulate emotions, as well as muscles. Computerized EM devices that talk and transfer images to the brain have been used by the USA for over twenty years. Mr. Hernandez is currently incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary Leavenworth, Leavenworth, Kansas 66048, as of December 2003. If you have information on the MIND CONTROL RESEARCH at the Gib Lewis Unit, Woodville, Texas, please contact Miguel Angel Hernandez - Riojas, U.S. Bureau of Prisons #58856-080, U.S. Penitentiary Leavenworth, P.O. Box 1000, Leavenworth, Kansas 66048-1000.

VINCENT MICHAEL MARINO, a/k/a VINCENT MICHAEL PORTALLA - TRACKING DEVICE

  1. MARINO sued the FBI and DEA for surgically implanting an electronic tracking device in this body. See, MARINO vs. GAMMEL, 191 F.Supp.2d 243 (D.Mass. 2002). This is an excellent case showing how the federal courts will allow jurisdiction for implant suits. The DEA admitted that MARINO had been implanted with an "a microchip tracking device" and DEA and FBI had been tracking MARINO. The DEA stated that the implant was "on loan" from the CIA and must be returned to the CIA. See Page 248. The DEA further stated that the device implanted was capable of tracking and listening and that they used staff at the Massachusetts General Hospital to insert the implant. The FBI stated, "we knew where you were from Boston to Nevada to Arizona." See Page 249. It appears that MARINO is incarcerated within the U.S. Bureau of Prisons and his location is available within the U.S. Bureau of Prisons web site.

HARLAN GIRARD - MIND CONTROL VICTIM

  1. This is the Sunday, January 14, 2007, article "MIND GAMES" by Sharon Weinberger, that appeared within www.washingtonpost.com. Harlan Girard is also the Director of the "INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF OFFENSIVE MICROWAVE WEAPONS" group. As stated within other documents of Lambros', Girard has not chosen to assist Lambros after he learned Lambros was incarcerated for drug distribution.

    DOWNLOAD JANUARY 14, 2007 ARTICLE "MIND GAMES" BY SHARON WEINBERGER

ABOUT MIND CONTROL IMPLANTS

ROBERT NAESLUND, STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN - IMPLANT VICTIM AND RESEARCHER

  1. April 19, 1995 letter from Lambros to Naeslund
  2. The Computer-Brain Report, an Overview
  3. "BRANDED BY SECURITY POLICE," by Robert Naeslund of Gruppen, Box 136, 114-79, Stockholm, Sweden, Fax 08-668-60-66. This document is excellent and offers x-ray proof of police in Sweden implanting Mr. Naeslund. Please CLICK HERE to preview the document which appears in another section of this web site. Please support Robert Naeslund and Gruppen. Thank you.

MARGO CHERNEY, IMPLANT VICTIM FROM ADA, OK.

October 30, 2000, letter from Margo Cherney, Ada, OK, to John G. Lambros, as per the request of JoJo Carey, as to her remote neurological manipulation for a little over eight (8) years. Margo Cherney was kind enough to list the different ways she has been attacked, which include: WHISPERY VOICES, VIVID DREAMS, HOT & COLD SENSATIONS ON VARIOUS PARTS OF THE BODY, MUSCLE CONTROL, MANIPULATE SENSE OF TASTE AND SMELL, TACTILE SENSES MANIPULATION, PAIN, SLEEP DEPRIVATION, MEMORY AND CONCENTRATION SEVERELY AFFECTED, CONTROL OF URINATION AND BOWEL MOVEMENTS, VISUAL DISTURBANCES, etc. The foregoing appears somewhat standard as to symptoms experienced by mind control victims. The letter is two (2) pages in length and offered in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD OCTOBER 30, 2000, LETTER FROM MARGO CHERNEY HERE IN PDF.

MANKIND RESEARCH UNLIMITED, INC., SILVER SPRING, MARYLAND - USA

  1. The following article appeared within the Covert Action Magazine, Number 9, June 1980, entitled "MIND CONTROL: The Story of Mankind Research Unlimited, Inc." by A.J. Weberman. Mr. Weberman exposes the scientists and personal at MRU and there links to MIND CONTROL experiments by the CIA and the U.S. Navy. In 1994 Carl Schleicher, Ph.D. was president of Mankind Research Unlimited, Inc., 1315 Apple Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, Telephone (301) 587-8686. The article is seven (7) pages long with a one (1) page letter from Carl Schleicher to Jean Hendrickson and an ALLEGED MRU company background, facilities, and relevant experience background that is four (4) pages in length. These documents are being offered in PDF format. YOU MUST HAVE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

    DOWNLOAD THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS IN PDF.

ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL SECURITY ALUMNI

  1. May 13, 1995 letter from McKinney to Louis Freeh, Director of FBI
  2. July 27, 1995 letter from McKinney to Lambros
  3. August 5, 1995 letter from Lambros to McKinney
  4. December 30, 1995 letter from Lambros to Association of National Security Alumni, Editors Lyon & MacMichael

CATHOLIC CHURCH - VATICAN RADIO - KILLING PEOPLE WITH MIND CONTROL SIGNAL.

1. Attached is the February 20, 2002, article from USA TODAY entitled "CASE AGAINST VATICAN RADIO DISMISSED." The question is: Why is the VATICAN transmitting excessive ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES????? Italian prosecutors alleged that the excessive electromagnetic emissions by Vatican Radio had damaged the health of about 100,000 people living near the transmitters in a suburb of Rome. The one page article is offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU MUST HAVE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 20, 2002, VATICAN ARTICLE HERE IN PDF.

2. May 20, 2005, THE WEEK, published the article, "ROME - "Polluting priests," which stated "A Roman court this week convicted two Vatican Radio officials of "polluting the environment" with ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES FROM A TRANSMISSION TOWER. Cardinal Roberto Tucci, Vatican liaison for the station, and the Rev. Pasquale Borgomeo, the station's director general, were each sentenced to 10 days in jail. ..... Residents of a Roman suburb had been complaining that the Vatican's huge transmitter was causing high rates of LEUKEMIA among children. The court has yet to rule on the amount of civil damages the Vatican must pay." See. Page 10, THE WEEK, May 20, 2005.

Julianne McKinney, Association of National Security Alumni, Electronic Surveillance Project, had identified over 100 victims of Mind Control in 1993.

Harlan Girard, Director, International Committee For The Convention Against Offensive Microwave Weapons, Philadelphia, PA, had identified over 500 victims of Mind Control in 1995.

Walter Bowart, Founder, Freedom of Thought Foundation, Tucson, AZ, had identified over 150 victims of Mind Control in 1995.

Lynne Moss Sharman, Director, Canadian Stone Angels, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada has been active in locating mind control victims.

Michael Quilligan, Freelance Journalist, Muiderberg, Netherlands. Mr. Quilligan requested information on John Gregory Lambros on December 12, 1994 from Attorney Jeff Orren, as to Lambros' implantion in Brazil. Regular contributions by Mr. Quilligan appear in French (Intelligence Newsletter, Paris); Irish (Sunday Business Post); The Phoenix (Dublin); and Dutch (Bres, Amsterdam). Past stories include an outline of the CIA's MK-ULTRA program, and the work of spook-scientist Dr. Sidney Gottlieb and UCLA's Dr. Jolyon West. This letter is one (1) page and being offered in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD MICHAEL QUILLIGAN LETTER DATED DECEMBER 12, 1994, HERE IN PDF.

Jeff Levering, former Defense Intelligence Agency employee offered Lambros information as to his use of ear canal implant transmitter/receiver devices that was manufactured by Motorola and General Electric. Mr. Levering held a M.D. in anesthesiology prior to incarceration. This one (1) page MEMORANDUM from Lambros to his attorneys et al. is dated September 10, 1994 and being offered in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD JEFF LEVERING MEMORANDUM DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 1994, HERE IN PDF.

Colonel BLACKSHEAA, U.S. Army Rangers, Intelligence Division, in 1969 and 1970 while stationed in Brasilia, Brazil. This may not be the correct spelling of Colonel Blacksheaa's name. Colonel Blacksheaa assisted in the implantation of Brazilian's in 1969 and 1970. Attached is a one (1) page letter to Lt. Colonel Richard S. Johnson requesting background information on Colonel BLACKSHEAA, dated May 6, 1995 and being offered in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD COLONEL BLACKSHEAA LETTER DATED MAY 6, 1995, HERE IN PDF.

July 29, 2004, THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE. Dan Vergano of USA TODAY states within his article, "Mind control: More than just a plot point?", "From a psychologist's viewpoint, THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE'S implant scenario sounds far off and reminiscent of some often-reported delusions, says STEVEN HASSAN of the Freedom of Mind Resource Center in Somerville, Mass. 'I have 30 years of doing work in this area, and I have repeatedly met people who claim aliens or the CIA implanted mind-control chips in them. I have yet to see those chips show in brain scans., Boycott Brazil supporters think STEVEN HASSAN works for the U.S. Government, as he is aware of the x-rays of John Gregory Lambros and BRIAN WRONGE which show brain control implants within there brains. The July 29, 2004, article by Dan Vergano is being offered in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD DAN VERGANO JULY 29, 2004 ARTICLE, HERE IN PDF.

U.S. EMBASSY IN OTTAWA, CANADA - ELECTROMAGNETIC SIGNAL

November 18, 2005, THE WEEK, Page 8, reported that a mysterious electro- magnetic signal disabled hundreds of automatic garage-door openers in Ottawa, Canada. "Some angry local residents noted that ONLY homes within a 25 mile radius of the U.S. Embassy were affected."

SUGGESTED BOOKS TO READ

    1. PSYCHIC DICTATORSHIP in the USA, by Author Alex Constantine 1995. Constantine's book uncovers the terrifying extent of electromagnetic and biotelemetric mind control experimentation on involuntary human subjects in America today. John Gregory Lambros is mentioned within the Acknowledgements on page x, "John Lambros, a victim of CIA mind control experiments, contributed a burgeoning file on his tormentors." Also on page 43, "Is it possible, asks JOHN LAMBROS, a prisoner at Leavenworth and mind control experimentee (a claim he corroborates with an X-ray of four strand-shaped foreign objects in his head) that the particle beam intended for enemy missiles alone might now be intended for human minds?"

    2. VIRTUAL GOVERNMENT, CIA Mind Control Operations in America, by Author Alex Constantine. CIA-NAZI-MILITARY mind control operations.

    3. HEARING "VOICES", The Hidden History of the CIA's Electromagnetic Mind-Control Experiments. Global Alert by ALEX CONSTANTINE. (Controlling human behavior by remote radio transmission isn't science fiction - it's a fact. After years of secret experiments, the U.S. Government has achieved its goal: Breaking and entering American minds at will.) This magazine article appeared in JANUARY 1995, "HUSTLER MAGAZINE," pages 104, 113, 120 and 134.
      DOWNLOAD "HEARING VOICES" PAGES 104, 113, 120 and 134 IN PDF HERE.

    4. EARTH RISING THE REVOLUTION, Toward a Thousand Years of Peace, by Dr. Nick Begich and James Roderick. Published by Earthpulse Press, P.O. Box 201393, Anchorage, Alaska 99520. Is it possible to transmit a signal to the brain of a person, from a distance, which deposits specific sounds, voice or other information which is understandable? Is it possible to transfer sound in a way where only the targeted person can hear the "VOICE IN THE HEAD" and no one else hears a thing? Is it possible to shift a person's emotions using remote electromagnetic tools? Dr. Begich and Roderick say YES. See, page 145. You may contact Dr. Begich and Roderick thru there web site at: www.earthpulse.com. If you would like to review Dr. Begich and Roderick's answers to the above, please download pages 145 thru 162 of there book that has been provided to the courts to prove LAMBROS' case. YOU MUST HAVE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
      DOWNLOAD PAGES 145 THRU 162 IN PDF.(Pages 151 & 152 not included)

    5. For your review is a list of books and studies that will assist you in believing the governments of the world have the technology to implant humans to control and monitor them. Sections include "AUDITORY PROSTHESES & E.S.B.". BIOTELEMETRY", "CORTEX", "HEAD-MAGNETIC FIELDS", "MOSCOW SIGNAL", "MICROWAVE & EMF", and "VISUAL PROSTHESES & E.S.B.". The list is six (6) pages in length and being offered in PDF FORMAT. Please note that each page is hand-numbered in the lower right hand corner. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.
      DOWNLOAD INDEX OF BOOKS AND STUDIES ON BIOTELEMETRY, ETC. HERE IN PDF.

    6. JOURNEY INTO MADNESS, The True Story of Secret CIA Mind Control and Medical Abuse, by Gordon Thomas. Gordon Thomas speaks of the results achieved by Dr. Jose Delgado, a Yale psychologist after he implanted a bull with electrodes in its brain. "Dr. Delgado goaded the bull by activating the implants, ... pressed another button and the animal promptly stopped in its tracks, the result of a signal transmitted to the electrode implants in the part of the bull's brain that calmed it." "Dr. Robert G. Heath, a neurosurgeon at Tulane University ... implanted 125 electrodes in the brain and body of a single patient - for which he claimed a world record - and had spent hours stimulating the man's pleasure centers." Other names of interest include, Dr. Gottlieb, Richard C. Helms, Dr. Stephen Aldrich, Ralph K. Schwitzgebel and his brother Robert, Dr. Cameron, and Barton L. Ingraham and JAMES R. SCHLESINGER. Please download pages 276 thru 279 of JOURNEY INTO MADNESS. This PDF document NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.
      DOWNLOAD PAGES 276 THRU 279 OF JOURNEY INTO MADNESS HERE IN PDF.

    7. August 4, 2005, article "REM0TE-CONTROLLED HUMANS" by Leah Hoffmann within www.Forbes.com. Nippon Telegraph and Telephone is currently offering and marketing GALVANIC VESTIBULAR STIMULATION SYSTEMS, or GVS to control humans. The system controls humans movement and balance by delivering weak electric currents behind a persons ears. The system can alter the course of your movements. The article is offered in PDF FORMT and you need Adobe ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.
      DOWNLOAD AUGUST 4, 2005, ARTICLE "REMOTE-CONTROLLED HUMANS" HERE IN PDF.

PUBLISHED INTERVIEWS WITH JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS

1. December 1996 interview of John Gregory Lambros by Reporter Mike Allen for radio program "WAVE STATION X." (Radio Station KKFI, Kansas City, Missouri) The interview is a total of nine (9) pages including a one page cover memorandum in PDF FORMAT. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT.

DOWNLOAD DECEMBER 1996 "WAVE STATION X" INTERVIEW HERE IN PDF.

TOM PETTERS REQUESTS JOHN LAMBROS TO BE HIS "JAILHOUSE LAWYER":

Jailhouse lawyer John Gregory Lambros has prepared and filed the following pleadings for Thomas Joseph Petters due to his denial of his 28 U.S.C. 2255, "MOTION TO VACATE" by the Honorable Judge Richard H. Kyle on December 5, 2013. See, USA vs. THOMAS JOSEPH PETTERS, Criminal No. 08-364(RHK), Docket entry 628. This was also listed under Civil No. 13-1110(RHK), U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota.

1. December 28, 2013: "Motion to Disqualify the Honorable Judge Richard H. Kyle in this Action. Defendant Petters Requests the Recusal of Judge Kyle, Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455(a), 455(b)(5)(i), and 455(b)(5)(iii). Defendant Petters was prejudiced." This motion is 19 pages in length and does not contain the 50 plus pages of exhibits.

DOWNLOAD DECEMBER 28, 2013 "MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE KYLE" - HERE IN PDF.

2. December 28, 2013: "Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment of this Court's 'Memorandum Opinion and Order' Filed December 5, 2013, Pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." This motion is 13 pages in length and does not contain the exhibits.

DOWNLOAD DECEMBER 28, 2013 "MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT" - HERE IN PDF.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON PETTERS AND JAILHOUSE LAWYER LAMBROS IS AVAIIABLE AT:
www.NoPayClassifieds.com/TomPetters
www.TomPettersFacts.com
www.ThomasPetters.com

3. January 8, 2014:  John R. Marti, Acting U.S. Attorney, files the "GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT PETTERS' MOTIONS TO ALTER AND AMEND JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 59(e) AND MOTION TO DISQUALIFY UNDER 28 U.S.C.
455." This motion is six (6) pages in length.

DOWNLOAD JANUARY 8, 2014 "GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE" IN THIS ACTION - HERE IN PDF.

4. JailHouse Lawyer Lambros responds to the government, filing "THOMAS JOSEPH PETTERS" RESPONSE TO 'GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT PETTERS' MOTIONS TO ALTER AND AMEND JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 59(e) AND MOTION TO DISQUALIFY UNDER 28 U.S.C. 455." This motion is 12 pages in length and does not contain the exhibits.      THIS MOTION IS DATED: JANUARY 15, 2014.

DOWNLOAD JANUARY 15, 2014 "PETTERS' RESPONSE TO GOVERNMENT - HERE IN PDF.

5. JANUARY 15, 2014:  JailHouse Lawyer Lambros suggests that his client Petters' request bail and files " .   MOTION FOR BAIL". This motion is 3 pages in length.

DOWNLOAD JANUARY 15, 2014 "MOTION FOR BAIL" IN THIS ACTION - HERE IN PDF.

6. FEBRUARY I0, 2014: Judge Richard H. Kyle, issues "MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER", denying Movant Petter and JailHouse Lawyer Lamhros' Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Doe. No. 630) and Motion to Disqualify (Doc. No. 631). The Motion for Bail (Doc. No. 636) was denied as moot. U.S. vs. PETTERS, Crim. No. 08-364 and Civil No. 13-1110. This ORDER is eight (8) in length. (Doc. No. 637)

DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY I0, 2014 "MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER" IN THIS ACTION - HERE IN PDF.

7. MARCH 3, 2014: Movant Petters and JailHouse Lawyer Lambros file "MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT OF THIS COURT'S 'MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER' FILED FEBRUARY i0, 2014, PURSUANT TO RULE 59(e) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AS TO THE 'MOTION TO DISQUALIFY THE HONORABLE JUDGE RICHARD H. KYLE IN THIS ACTION' Dated: March 3, 2014'" THE SUBJECT OF THIS MOTION: Denial of Recusal Motion dated December 28, 2013 (Doc. No. 631). This motion is 21 pages in length with 12 pages of EXHIBITS and a 1 page cover letter. Total pages 34.

DOWNLOAD MARCH 3, 2014 "MOTION TO ALTER - RULE 59(e) - TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE KYLE" HERE IN PDF.

8. MARCH 11, 2014, Judge Kyle denies PETTERS and JAILHOUSE LAWYER LAMBROS' Rule 59(e) "MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE KYLE.

DOWNLOAD MARCH 11, 2014, ORDER DENYING RULE 59(e) MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE KYLE, HERE IN PDF.

9. MARCH 18, 2014, JailHouse Lawyer Lambros files "NOTICE OF APPEAL" and "MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY" for Tom Petters. USA vs. PETTERS, Criminal No. 08-364 and Civil No. 13-1110. The cover letter and both motions with all exhibits are a total of 70 pages.

DOWNLOAD MARCH 18, 2014, "NOTICE OF APPEAL" AND "COA" MOTION, HERE IN PDF
.

PEOPLE AND BUSINESS FINDER

To locate a PERSON and long lost RELATIVES, try the following search engines and web sites. Start by typing the name into some the search engines by placing the name inside QUOTATION MARKS to get the best results.
www.google.com

Get instant answers to questions by visiting research sites: www.answers.com and www.ask.com

Satellite images of your favorite spot: www.maps.google.com and www.terraserver.com

Telephone white pages: www.infospace.com

Free Mormon search service to locate RELATIVES: www.familysearch.org

Free database to track down RELATIVES. This service allows you to network with others who may be looking for the same information. Voted the Best Genealogy Resource web site by Yahoo! Internet Life Magazine in January 2002:
www.rootsweb.com

GLOBAL YELLOW PAGES -- Search over 300 Yellow Pages Worldwide by SwitchBoard.com

U.S. TOWN AND CITY PURCHASING AGENTS AND OFFICIALS -- www.city.net or www.munisource.org

Need a calculator to compute numbers and measurements in locating your favorite Brazilian? Go to MARTINDALE'S CALCULATORS ON-LINE CENTER which offers over 20,000 calculators to assist you (2005): www.martindalecenter.com/calculators.html

 LOCATE PHOTOGRAPHS OF PEOPLE and other images through these search engines:

WANTED: TALK-RADIO HOSTS - WEBCAST BROADCASTING

BOYCOTT BRAZIL is looking for supporters to host TALK-RADIO shows on the internet. LYCOS Talk Radio allows supporters of Boycott Brazil to do this FREE. Simply register to be a broadcaster, set a schedule for your show and start spreading the word. Registered users can listen via Internet connections and submit instant messages while you're on the air. LYCOS Talk Radio only works with Windows, and computers must be equipped with a microphone to broadcast.

CLICK HERE: www.talkradio.lycos.com

August 2005: The following web sites offer software to assist you in webcasting:
a. www.shoutcast.com Shoutcast is a free service.
b. www.mercora.com Mercora charges $4 per month.
c. www.pirateradio.com Pirate Radio ($40 software package) offers ambitious webcasters the use of jingles, advertising or call-in segments.
d. www.spacialaudio.com SAM Broadcaster ($200 software package) SAM allows you to compress your audio so that you can reach twice as many listeners on the same connection.
e. www.live365.com Live365 offers several packages. The basic service does not allow you to transmit live audio. For $15 per month you can hook up a microphone and transmit live.
f. KEEP IT LEGAL: If you are mixing major artists into your broadcast you need to know about licensing fees, so the lawyers don't knock on your door. Live365 and Mercora INCLUDE FEES IN THERE CHARGES. To avoid the issue go to: www.redferret.net/pmwiki

g. TALK SHOW FORMAT ONLY: You don't need high-quality stereo to beam out the Boycott Brazil message, so convert your message into MONO and use a format like Ogg at www.vorbis.com
h. MAC-CAST: Got a Mac? Only Web-based tools Live365 and Shoutcast are compatible.


WANTED: ANGEL INVESTORS, INCUBATOR, VENTURE CAPITALISTS, AND STRATEGIC PARTNERS

www.brazilboycott.org
We are an educational group who in October 1999 secured the URL: www.brazilboycott.org and commenced building our website to educate the world via the web as to the torture, electronic mind control, and denial of due process to U.S. Citizen John Gregory Lambros, a native of Minnesota.

We presently have over $500 billion (US) worth of commercial liens and active federal law suits pending against Brazil and other parties involved in the torture and denial of due process to Lambros and are looking for ANGEL INVESTORS, INCUBATOR, VENTURE CAPITALISTS, & STRATEGIC PARTNERS to work with us to take this site to greater awareness by increasing global boycotts and selective purchasing ordinances against BRAZIL.

Defendants in current law suit have been denied summary judgement and major law firm has been appointed by court to represent Plaintiff Lambros. Pleadings, Report & Recommendations, and Court Orders are available for review within our web site.

Currently averaging 3,000 hits per day (May 2005) and according to the University of Washington-Stanford study, acquiring firms paid an average of $167 for each monthly visitor to the target company's Web site. Our site is basically a non-linear gold mine as to the human rights violations by Brazil and others. See, THE INDUSTRY STANDARD, July 24, 2000, page 178. (The newsmagazine of the internet economy)

If you feel you have something to offer as an angel investor, incubator, venture capitalist, or strategic partner, please contact us.

John Gregory Lambros, #00436-124, P.O. Box 1000, Leavenworth, Kansas 66048-1000 USA

PLEASE ASSIST IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF THIS AD.

THANK YOU!

FREE LEGAL ACCESS AND SELF-HELP LAW RESEARCH ONLINE:

The following web sites offer mostly FREE legal research to assist you in filing law suits and doing legal research. Get involved and take the law into your own hands online.

NOLO.COM - is a self-help one-stop law resource center for doing your own legal research. Web site: www.nolo.com

THELAW.COM - offers informative articles and ONE-ON-ONE REAL TIME CHATS WITH ATTORNEYS. Founded by former New York City mayor and PEOPLE'S COURT judge Ed Koch. Web site: www.thelaw.com

FINDLAW - The Net library houses all the forms, statutes, and federal regulations you'll need. Web site: www.findlaw.com

LAWOFFICE.COM - this site offers a directory of attorneys throughout the United States. Web site: www.lawoffice.com

National Federation of Paralegal Associations (NFPA). NFPA maintains a web site to assist all legal professionals in their internet research. Web site: www.paralegals.org

ICOURTHOUSE - this site PROVIDES YOU WITH A JURY of unseen peers that will decide your fate of innocent or guilty when you present your legal case. [BRAZIL has been found GUILTY]. Web site: www.i-courthouse.com

USLAW.COM - this site offers LAWYER CHAT to assist you in understanding legal concepts. The site's ASK A LAWYER forum, where you chat with a real attorney, operates 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The site also sells binding legal documents such as wills, leases, employment contracts, and partnership agreements for $25 or less each. Web site: www.uslaw.com

EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS WEB SITE - The web site offers the full text of all opinions, published and unpublished, docket sheets of all cases (back to 1991), the court's oral argument calendars, the Federal and Eighth Circuit appellate rules, practice guides, the Eighth Circuit Model Jury Instructions, and digital versions of all oral arguments from March, 2000 to date. Forms and practice check-lists are also available. Also free access to the full text of all attorney-filed briefs in year 2000 cases. Web site: www.ca8.uscourts.gov

SEARCH THE INVISIBLE WEB

Can't find more on mind control, torture, brain control implants and Brazil when searching the World Wide Web using your typical search engines? It's no wonder. Typical search engines only skim the surface of the Web. What they don't see is known as the "DEEP" or "INVISIBLE" Web. The deep Web contains nearly 550 BILLION DOCUMENT (May 2001), compared with about I billion on the Web's surface, according to internet content company Bright Planet. The deep Web consists of data that search engines generally miss, INCLUDING PDF FILES, streaming audio and video, and information STORED IN DATABASES, such as government records and telephone directories. If your looking for a specific piece of information, search the invisible Web by trying the following sites:

1. InvisibleWeb.com: www.invisibleweb.com

2. CompletePlanet: www.completeplanet.com

3. WebData.com: www.webdata.com

4. ProFusion.com: beta.profusion.com

HELP BOYCOTT BRAZIL SPREAD THE WORD BY POSTING MESSAGES IN THE NEWSGROUPS, FREE INTERNET WEB SITES, AND ONLINE NEWSPAPERS AROUND THE WORLD:

The following internet NEWSGROUPS need you to voice your OPINION as to the information contained within this BOYCOTT BRAZIL web site. Please leave your message and/or chat within the following NEWSGROUPS:

alt.government.abuse
alt.torture
brasil.anuncios
brasil.geral
brasil.noticias
brasil.politica
brasil.teste
br.colmeia
br.comp-net
br.piadas
soc.culture.brazil
alt.activism.latino-youth

If you would like to support Boycott Brazil by establishing a FREE web site with your views and a link to this site, consider using a FREE HOSTING SERVICE for your web site. One of the most popular free hosting service as of October 2001 is Yahoo's GeoCities. Also you may find a helpful listing of the top 20 FREE WEB HOSTING services at STORMLOADER.COM. Thanking you in advance for your consideration in supporting Boycott Brazil.

www.geocities.yahoo.com

www.stormloader.com/toptwenty

www.hypermart.net/index.gsp For a list of free business hosts.

Contact newspaper editors, reporters and place small classified ads with links to the Boycott Brazil web site in NEWSPAPERS AROUND THE WORLD. OnlineNewspapers.com is a no-nonsense site that connects you to newspapers around the world. Choose the place that interests you and get a list of edifying sources. The site is adding new papers regularly.

www.onlinenewspapers.com

SUGGESTED MESSAGE TO LEAVE IN NEWSGROUPS, NEWSPAPERS, AND MAGAZINES.

IF YOU DON'T WANT SOMETHING TO BE TRUE, does that make it propaganda? When we're children and we don't want to listen, we put our hands over our ears. As we grow up, we create new ways to ignore things we don't want to hear. We make excuses. We look the other way. We label things "propaganda" or "scare tactics." But it doesn't work. It doesn't make the truth go away. Government and corporate MIND CONTROL PROGRAMS are used to intimidate, torture, and murder people globally. It may not be what you want to hear. But that doesn't make it any less true. Please visit and support John Gregory Lambros by distributing this ad to free classified advertising sites and newsgroups globally. www.brazilboycott.org THANK YOU!

1. In December 2003 and January 2004, Lambros wrote Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon, Michael Keller, Stanford University Librarian, and Brewster Kahle, CEO of Internet Archive for assistance in converting the BOYCOTT BRAZIL web site into a plain-text database. The three (3) letters are being offered in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT.

DOWNLOAD LAMBROS LETTERS TO JEFF BEZOS, BREWSTER KAHLE, AND MICHAEL KELLER HERE IN PDF.

BOYCOTT BRAZIL SUPPORTS THE LEGALIZATION OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA:

THE FOLLOWING EDUCATIONAL FACTS IN THE WAR TO LEGALIZE MEDICAL MARIJUANA ARE COURTESY OF THE DRCNet FOUNDATION. (www.drcnet.org)

1. Legal marijuana use in Switzerland: Cabinet gives okay, next step is Parliamentary approval. October 7, 2000, Issue #154.

2. Switzerland allows under current law, any form of cannabis may be cultivated, but it may not be used as a drug. Switzerland has 150 "hemp" shops that sell marijuana for smoking as well as hemp products. The shops pack, label, and bar code the weed as "hemp tea," "dried flowers," and "potpourri." The police do not interfere. October 7, 2000, Issue #154.

3. British Columbia, Canada marijuana thrives in its attempt to legalize medical cannabis. Police estimate that there are some 9,000 grow operations in Vancouver alone producing medical marijuana. The maximum sentence for marijuana growing is two (2) years, compared to a possible life sentence in US States such as Texas or a federal sentence of a mandatory minimum of 10 years. September 22, 2000, Issue #152.

4. CALIFORNIA: Sentencing Reform PASSED: 60.8% in favor, 39.2% opposed.
Proposition 36 will require that those convicted of nonviolent drug possession offenses for the first or second time be offered rehabilitation programs instead of state prison. November 10, 2000, DRCNet Issue #159.

5. MENDOCINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA: Marijuana Decriminalization PASSED: 58% in favor, 42% opposed.
Mendocino County, CA. MEASURE G will allow adults to grow twenty-five (25) plants apiece, but not for sale. The measure further directs the county sheriff and prosecutor to make marijuana crimes their last priority and directs county officials to seek an end to state and federal marijuana laws. November 10, 2000, DRCNet Issue #159.

6. CANADA Canada now has legal medical marijuana through governmental certification and is setting up a full-blown regulated system of medical marijuana availability for all patients needing it. November 22, 2000, DRCNet, Issue #161.

7. States within the United States that have enacted medical marijuana laws:
Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii (by action of the legislature), Maine, Oregon, Washington, Nevada, and Colorado. Washington, D.C. residents voted in 1998 to allow medical marijuana use, but Congress blocked the measure from becoming law. December 1, 2000, DRCNet, Issue #162.

8. April 20, 2013: The business of growing marijuana is starting to become mainstream. Eighteen (18) states and the District of Columbia have approved the use and production of marijuana for medical use, including two (2) states, Colorado and Washington, that also allow RECREATIONAL USE. The USA has approximately 2,000 to 4,000 businesses now producing the plant for legal purposes. Total sales: $1.2 billion to $1.3 billion in 2012, according to the National Cannabis Industry Association.

Colorado passed a new law that next January 2014 will allow anyone 21 and older to buy marijuana from retailers, a market currently limited to some 110,000 patients with prescriptions. Industry publication Medical Marijuana Business Daily forecasts a tripling in annual sales in Colorado in 2014 to at least $700 million.

The following states in the USA have legalized marijuana for medical use only: Oregon, Nevada, California, Arizona, New Mexico, Montana, Alaska, Hawaii, Michigan, Vermont, Maine, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Jersey, Delaware, and Massachusetts.

The states that have legalized marijuana for BOTH MEDICINAL AND RECREATIONAL USE are Washington and Colorado.

States that have bills pending that would legalize marijuana for medicinal and/or recreational use are: Iowa, Missouri, Illinois, Kentucky, West Virginia, New York, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Alabama, and Florida. Source: Marijuana Policy Project.

: www.PetitionOnline.com/jlambros/petition.html

Click to view site statistics

BE NOTIFIED WHEN THIS WEB SITE CHANGES! Spyonit offers virtual assistants that will monitor the BOYCOTT BRAZIL Web site and notify you when a Web page is changed. Click here and get your virtual assistant from Spyonit: www.spyonit.com

For more information write (snail mail) JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS directly at:

JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS
Prisoner No. 00436-124
U. S. Penitentiary Leavenworth
1300 Metropolitan Ave.
Leavenworth, KS 66048-1000
USA

THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND ASSISTANCE IN MY BOYCOTT OF BRAZILIAN PRODUCTS.

Donations to the BOYCOTT BRAZIL cause may be mailed to the following address, payable to JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS. U.S. Postal Money Orders and U.S. Bank Checks only. Go to "Tip Box" on how to use paypal or credit cards.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS
Reg. No. 00436-124
PO Box 474701
DES MOINES, IOWA 50947-0001

WEB RINGS


This Close the SOA site owned by John Lambros.

Previous
Skip Previous
Previous 5 Sites
Random Site

Next
Skip Next
Next 5 Sites
List Sites

Join Close The SOA WebRing



Member of

Pages of Wonder (Webring)

View The Index Of Pages Of Wonder

This Area-X site owned by John Lambros.
[ Previous 5 Sites | Previous | Next | Next 5 Sites | Random Site | List Sites ]

 

SEARCH ENGINE AFFILIATES OF BOYCOTT BRAZIL

1. BOYCOTT BRAZIL is a paid subscriber of INKTOMI search solutions who is partners with the following world's leading online services:

a. America Online;
b. Microsoft Network;
c. iWon;
d. HotBot;
e. Looksmart;
f. Goto.com
g. NBCi;
h. Espotting.com; (United Kingdom)
i. About.com;
j. goo.ne.jp (Japan)
k. eoexchange.com
l. Radarruol (Brazil)
m. Anzwers.com.au (Australia)
n. Cnet
o. swisssearch.com (Germany)
p. chello.com (Europe)
q. icq.com.
r. mobilcom.de (Germany)
s. n2h2.com
t. starmedia.com (Latin America)

PLEASE REVIEW AND CONTACT THE BELOW WEBSITES THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES TO ASSIST YOU IN VOICING DISSATISFACTION WITH THE PRESENT STATE OF MATTERS IN THE CIVIL JUSTICE SYSTEM.

Americans for Legal Reform http://www.americans4legalreform.com

American Injustice http://www.fa-ir.org

American Tort Reform Association http://www.atra.org

Antishyster News Magazine http://www.antishyster.com

Center for Judicial Accountability http://www.judgewatch.org

Citizens Against Law Suit Abuse http://www.cala.com

Citizens Against Law Suit Abuse http://calahouston.org

Citizens Against Legal Abuse http://www.ca-la.org

Citizens for Constitutional Property Rights http://ccpr.freedom.org

Citizens for Justice in New Jersey http://www.cjnj.org

Citizens for Legal Responsibility http://www.clr.org

Citizens for Sound Economy http://cse.org

Civil Justice Association of California http://www.cjac.org

Common Cause http://www.commoncause.org

Committee for Judicial Ethics http://www.johnsoncountykansas.net

Committee to Expose Dishonest Incompetent Attorneys and Judges http://www.amoralethics.com

Constitution Society http://www.constitution.org

Family Court Reform Council http://www.familycourts.com

Halt - Americans for Legal Reform http://halt.org

The Injustice Line http://injusticeline.com

Institute for Fist Amendment Studies http://www.ifas.org

Jail 4 Judges http://www.jail4judges.org

Jefferson on Politics & Government: Judicial Branch http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/jefferson/quotations/jeff1270.htm

Judge Watch http://judgewatch.ourfamily.com

Judicial Hall of Shame http://home.earthlink.net/%7Edlaw70/shame.htm

Law Reform Network http://www.lawreform.net/index.htm

Lectric Law Library's stacks http://www.lectlaw.com/filsh/zbk02.htm

Legal Ethics and Reform http://weusers.anet-stl.com

Legal Justice Reform Network http://atps.com/uclr

No One Is Married: Marriage Rescue Initiative http://www.no-one-is married.com

Our Story http://freeweb.pdq.net

Overlawyered http://www.clahouston.org

People Before Lawyers http://perkel.com

Texans Against Lawsuit Abuse http://www.tala.com

United Citizens for Legal Reform http://www.atps.com

Victims of Surrogate's Court http://victimsofsurragatecourt.org

Victims of the System http://www.victimsofthesystem.org

Washington Legal Foundation http://wlf.org

We the People http://givemeliberty.org

"Tip Box"

 

If you would like to make a donation for the updating, promotion, and legal reserch of the BOYCOTT BRAZIL ORGANIZATION web site, please click the Tip Box for instructions on to make a donation. Thank you.

PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION: www.PetitionOnline.com/jlambros/petition.html

INTERNATIONAL EXTRADITION NEWS

1. October 2001, MEXICO's Supreme Court stopped the extradition of more than 70 people to the United States due to Mexico's constitution, which says that all people are capable of rehabilitation. A life sentence, the court ruled flies in the face of that concept. THE MAXIMUM SENTENCE IN MEXICO IS FORTY (40) YEARS, although sometimes a sixty (60) year term may be imposed. Please review the January 20, 2002, STAR TRIBUNE article from the New York Times entitled, "MEXICAN RULING LIMITS EXTRADITION, Those facing life won't go to U.S." This article is one (1) page in length in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD JANUARY 20, 2002 ARTICLE MAXIMUM SENTENCE IN MEXICO IS FORTY (40) YEARS HERE IN PDF.

2. June 29, 2003, ARGENTINE IS EXTRADITED FROM MEXICO TO SPAIN. Ricardo Cavallo, a former member of Argentina's military was extradited to Spain from Mexico City, Mexico on charges of genocide and terrorism for allegedly torturing dissidents during his country's "DIRTY WAR" against government opponents. CAVALLO is accused of torturing and killing suspected dissidents at the NOTORIOUS NAVAL MECHANICS SCHOOL in Buenos Aires during the military dictatorship that ruled Argentina from 1976 to 1983. Story reported on June 29, 2003, page A9, STAR TRIBUNE.

3. June 3, 2003, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, EN BENC, ruled DEA-led kidnapping of Mexican citizen created liability under Alien Tort Claims Act. See, ALVAREZ-MACHAIN, 331 F.3d 604 (9th Cir. 2003). "Mexican citizen's kidnapping in Mexico, at behest of Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), and his transfer to United States for arrest, violated law of nations, such that abductor could be held liable for kidnapping under Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA), even if DEA had extraterritoral criminal jurisdiction; arrest warrant issued by U.S. Court DID NOT AUTHORIZE ARRESTS WORLDWIDE, AND CONGRESS DID NOT GIVE DEA UNLIMITED ENFORCEMENT POWERS ABROAD. 28 U.S.C.A. 1350; Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Laws 432." Head Note 7.

4. July 31, 2003, Peruvian authorities plan to formally request the extradition of former president ALBERTO FUJIMORI from Japan. The extradition applies only to a murder charge that seeks to link FUJIMORI to killings committed by a death squad known as the "COLINA GROUP." Japan said that FUJIMORI is protected from extradition by Japanese citizenship that he got because his immigrant parents registered him as an infant with Japanese diplomats in Lima, Peru. Story reported on July 31, 2003, USA TODAY, Page 6A.

5. September 18, 2003, Spain's leading investigating judge, Baltasar Garzon, issued the first known indictment against Osama Bin Laden and 34 others for the September 11 terrorist attacks. Judge Garzon called for Interpol to arrest bin Laden and extradite him to Spain. Garzon said terrorism is included in Spain's UNIVERSAL JUSTICE LEGISLATION. under which crimes against HUMANITY can be tried there even if they were committed elsewhere. Story reported on September 18, 2003, USA TODAY, Page 11A.

6. September 24, 2003, "Diamond Buyers May Face Criminal Charges." Chief prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo of the International Criminal Court, based at The Hague, Netherlands, said crimes linked to the civil war in the central African nation that killed around 3 million people may have been committed as far away as the USA and Canada. "If they received diamonds and knew that the people delivering them were getting them because of genocide, then they could well be part of the crime." Rough diamonds from illegitimate sources, dubbed "blood" or "conflict" diamonds, are used to fund wars, mostly in Africa. Reported on September 24, 2003, USA TODAY, Page 18A. This article is in PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD SEPTEMBER 24, 2003, "DIAMOND BUYERS MAY FACE CRIMINAL CHARGES" HERE IN PDF.

7. February 1, 2004, Canada frees JOHN GRAHAM on BAIL to fight EXTRADITION to the United States. John Graham and Ario Looking Cloud where indicted by a Rapid City, South Dakota grand jury for the murder of American Indian Movement (AIM) activist Anna Mae Pictou-Aquash in 1973 at Wounded Knee, Pine Ridge, South Dakota. Reported on February 1, 2004, STAR TRIBUNE, Page A4. PLEASE NOTE THAT BRAZIL DOES NOT GIVE RAIL TO FIGHT EXTRADITION TO U.S., AT LEAST NOT TO JOHN LAMBROS. WHY?

8. 2004 list of countries of the world that DO NOT have a Treaty of Extradition with the United States of America. As of 2004, eithty-four (84) nations/countries do not have extradition treaties with the USA. An updated list of countries that have bilateral treaties of extradition with the United States is available in Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 3181 or at the Treaty Office of the United States Department of State. The list is one (1) page in PDF FORMAT. THE FREE ACROBAT READER MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM ADOBE SYSTEMS BY CLICKING HERE.

DOWNLOAD 2004 LIST OF COUNTRIES THAT DO NOT HAVE EXTRADITION TREATIES WITH THE USA HERE IN PDF.

9. July 8, 2005, A judge in British Columbia, Canada ordered the extradition of suspected eco-terrorist TRE ARROW to face firebombing charges in Oregon, USA. Judge Kristi Gill ruled that there was enough evidence that Arrow should face charges. Tim Russell, Arrow's attorney said the evidence is heresay and they will appeal. The FBI states Arrow is linked to the Earth Liberation Front. See, USA TODAY, Friday, July 8, 2005.

10. July 19, 2005, BERLIN - Germany's constitutional court prohibited the extradition of Mamoun Darkazanli, a 46-year-old businessman with dual German-Syrian citizenship to Spain to face trial on charges related to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the USA. This extradition case hinged on the European Union's decision in 2002 to establish a blocwide EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT allowing authorities to move detainee from one member country to another. Germany's constitutional court ruled in a 5-3 decision that a German law enabling extradition of Germans from trial in other EU countries violated a defendant's constitutional right to a review of the surrender order in a German Court. Mr. Darkazanli's lawyer, GUL PINAR, said her client could be rearrested at a later date should Germany pass a new enabling act implementing a European arrest warrant in accord with German law. See, WALL STREET JOURNAL, July 19, 2005, Page A12, by David Crawford.

11. November 18, 2005, It is reported that Chilean police in Santiago arrested ALBERTO FUJIMORI, the former president of Peru, hours after he arrived in Santiago, Chile. Peru is negotiating Fujimori's extradition to stand trial on 21 charges of human-rights violations and corruption. Peru and Chile have an extradition treaty. See, THE WEEK, November 18, 2005, Page 9.

12. August 2005, $50,000 BAIL BOND RELEASE ON U.S. DRUG EXTRADITION FROM CANADA. Marc Emery a Canadian entrepreneur who presided over the world's largest marijuana seed sales business was arrested in July 2005 in Lawrencetown, Nova Scotia where he was due to appear at Hemp Fest 2005, on a three (3) count indictment filed by Todd Greenberg, the assistant U.S. Attorney in Seattle prosecuting the case. Emery was charged with conspiracy to produce and sell marijuana, as well as money laundering crimes that carry up to life sentences. John Conroy, who leads Emery's Defense team states, under the Extradition Act, Canada is not obligated to surrender a citizen if to do so would be unjust or oppressive. Canada limits sentences for cannabis production to a maximum of seven (7) years." BRAZIL WOULD NOT GIVE LAMBROS AN EXTRADITION BAIL HEARING AS REQUIRED BY LAWS AS THE U.S. HAD SET BAIL AT $50,000 WHEN THEY SUBMIT EXTRADITION PAPERS TO BRAZIL. LAMBROS BELIEVES IT WAS THE U. S. EMBASSY AND HIS CORRUPT LAWYERS THAT PREVENTED BAIL HEARINGS AND ADVANCED TORTURE INSTEAD.

13. January 26, 2006, LUCIA PINOCHET, the eldest daughter of former Chilean dictator General Augusto Pinochet, was taken into custody this week at a Washington- area airport because of an arrest warrant in Chile. Lucia Pinochet had been indicted by a Chilean judge on tax evasion and false passport charges.

14. May 19, 2006, PERU'S EX-PRESIDENT FREED ON BAIL IN CHILE ON EXTRADITION CHARGES FROM PERU. Chile's Supreme Court freed former Peruvian president ALBERTO FUJIMORI ON $3,000 BAIL but said he must remain in the country while he fights EXTRADITION on corruption and human rights charges. FUJIMORI, 67, came to Chile in November from Japan, where he lived after the government he headed from 1990- 2000 collapsed in a corruption scandal. By Paul Leavitt with wire report, USA TODAY, May 19, 2006. LAMBROS' ATTORNEY'S STATED BRAZIL DOES MOT GIVE BAIL TO PERSONS WAITING EXTRADITION. THIS WAS JUST ANOTHER LIE BY LAMBROS' ATTORNEY'S AND THE U. S. EMBASSY IN BRAZIL.

15. May 18, 2006, PABLO RAYO-MONTANO ARRESTED IN BRAZIL BY DEA FOR EXTRADITION TO USA. PABLO RAYO-MONTANO, 46, was arrested in Brazil after a grand jury in MIAMI, FLORIDA indicted RAYO-MONTANO this month and 31 others on charges of trafficking cocaine and laundering more than $150 million. The DEA alleges RAYO-MONTANO was a Colombian drug kingpin who allegedly delivered 15 tons of cocaine a month to the USA and EUROPE. PLEASE NOTE: THIS WILL BE AN EXCELLENT CASE TO WATCH AS RAYO- MONTANO CAN ONLY RECEIVE A LIFE SENTENCE IF HE IS EXTRADITED TO THE USA. BRAZIL DOES NOT ALLOW MORE THAN A 30 YEAR SENTENCE. LAMBROS WILL BE MONITORING THIS CASE TO SEE IF BRAZIL EXTRADITES RAY0-MONTANO TO THE USA.

Download MAY 18, 2006, ARTICLE "ALLEGED DRUG KINGPIN NABBED IN BRAZIL" by Donna Leinwand, here in PDF FORMAT. Also attached is the January 20, 2002, article "MEXICAN RULING LIMITS EXTRADITION, Those facing life won't go to the U.S.," by the New York Times. This is a two (2) page PDF FORMAT DOWNLOAD.

16. August 13, 2006, Lambros letter to Boycott Brazil Supporters, as to PABLO JOAQUIN RAYO-MONTANO receiving a life sentence if extradited from Brazil to USA. USA vs. PABLO JOAQUIN RAYO-MONTANO, Criminal Docket No. 06-20139, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Exhibits include U.S. Asst. Attorney ANDREA G. HOFFMAN's "Certificate of Trial Attorney", "PENALTY SHEET for RAYO-MONTANO", May 5, 2006 INDICTMENT, and copy of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines that apply to RAYO-MONTANO if extradited from Brazil to USA. PLEASE DISTRIBUTE THIS DOCUMENT THROUGHOUT BRAZIL VIA E-MAIL and www.ORKUT.COM (a social networking site similar to MySpace that is owned by Google. Orkut is known for its high percentage (70%) of Brazilian users.) THANK YOU!!!! If we can stop RAYO-MONTANO's extradition or limited it to twenty (20) years the Brazilian Supreme Court will have to reconsider Lambros' extradition.

DOWNLOAD AUGUST 13, 2006, LETTER FROM LAMBROS TO SUPPORTERS REGARDING RAYO-MONTANO.
This letter is 29 pages including exhibits and in PDF FORMAT.

17. March 27, 2007, letter from Lambros to ANDREA G. HOFFMAN, Assistant U.S. Attorney in Miami, Florida. Lambros places HOFFMAN on legal NOTICE as to her illegal acts in the extradition of PABLO JOAQUIN RAYO-MONTANO from BRAZIL. This letter is eight (8) pages with exhibits. PLEASE DISTRIBUTE THIS LETTER THROUGHOUT BRAZIL via E-Mail and www.ORKUT.COM. THANK YOU!!!!!

DOWNLOAD MARCH 27, 2007 LETTER TO ANDREA G. HOFFMAN, HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

18. April 05, 2007, "THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM" by Lambros, requesting THE FLORIDA BAR to investigate the ethical conduct of Florida lawyer ANDREA G. HOFFMAN, Court ID# A5500885, U.S. Assistant Attorney in Miami, Florida. Attorney HOFFMAN is requesting the illegal extradition of PABLO JOAQUIN RAYO- MONTANO from Brazil by PREVENTING the enforcement of U.S. Criminal Statutes as defined by the U.S. Congress and punishments prescribed therefor. This complaint was received by THE FLORIDA BAR on April 13, 2007, via U.S. Certified Mail. The inquiry/complaint form is a total of five (5) pages, NOT INCLUDING EXHIBITS which are available within this section, in PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD APRIL 05, 2007, "THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

19. February 08, 2007, U.S. GOVERNMENT WILL NOT ENFORCE RULING BY SUPREME COURT OF VENEZUELA AND MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS IN VENEZUELA AFTER EXTRADITION! On August 17, 1998, the Supreme Court of Venezuela approved the extradition of Cristobal Rodriguez BENITIZ, but stated that if an American Court convicts BENITIZ it "shall not ... impose[] a PENALTY involving [the] death penalty or life imprisonment or PUNISHMENT DEPRIVING HIS FREEDOM FOR MORE THAN THIRTY (30) YEARS." The Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Venezuela received this decision and COMMUNICATED to the United States that BENITIZ's EXTRADITION WAS "CONDITIONED TO THE UNDERSTANDING that [Benitiz] will NOT BE SENTENCED TO . . . life in prison or INCARCERATION FOR MORE THAN THIRTY (30) YEARS." Benitiz was extradited from Venezuela to the U.S. on August 28, 1998. See, BENITIZ vs. GARCIA, 476 F-3d 676, 679 (9th Cir. 2007). On February 8, 2007, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals stated, "The thirty-year (30) limitation that Venezuela sought to impose might be enforceable if that condition were AGREED TO BY BOTH COUNTRIES. We are wary, however, of enforcing extradition conditions that are neither expressly agreed to BY BOTH COUNTRIES nor contemplated by the RELEVANT EXTRADITION TREATY. A THIRTY-YEAR (30) L M TATION IS THEREFORE NOT ENFORCEABLE." Id. at 682. It appears that all decisions by foreign courts in extradition cases to the U.S. will have to be signed and approved by the Department of State, to ensure enforcement of penalty limitations such as thirty (30) years, before the person may be extradited from the foreign country. Lambros believes the Supreme Court of Venezuela should request the return of BENITIZ to Venezuela due to the breach of its ORDER limiting BENITIZ to a thirty (30) year sentence. - Please send e-mails to the Supreme Court of Venezuela, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Venezuela and President HUGO CHAVEZ - requesting that BENITIZ be returned to Venezuela due to the breach of contract in the extradition of BENITIZ.

DOWNLOAD BENITIZ vs. GARCIA, 476 F.3d 676 (9th Cir. 2007), HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

20. July 6, 2007, MOSCOW WON'T EXTRADITE SUSPECT TO BRITAIN. Russia has formally rejected a British request to extradite ANDREI LUGOVOI, the main suspect in the poisoning death of Russian emigre ALEXANDER LITVINENKO. The Russian constitution bars the extradition of Russian citizens. See, USA TODAY, July 6, 2007, Page 4A.

21. August 8, 2007, BRAZIL ARRESTS SUSPECTED DRUG KINGPIN. JUAN CARLOS RAMIREZ ABADIA, Age 44, an alleged Colombian drug kingpin wanted by U.S. AUTHORITIES and accused of shipping 500 tons of cocaine worth 410 billion from Colombia to the USA from 1990 to 2004. ABADIA is also suspected of killing police and informants in Colombia and the USA and had undergone several plastic surgeries to disguise his appearance. See, USA TODAY, August 8, 2007, Page 8A.

22. August 13, 2007, EXTRADITION HEARING FOR PANAMANIAN DICTATOR MANUEL NORIEGA TO FRANCE. A federal judge in Miami hears arguments on a extradition request from France to extradite former Panamanian Dictator MANUEL NORIEGA on charges that he laundered $3.15 million in drug profits by buying luxurious apartments in Paris. Noriega, 72, was captured in Panama by U.S. military in 1989 and has been in U.S. Prisons for 18 years. NORIEGA was to be released by the U.S. on September 9, 2007. See, USA TODAY, August 13, 2007.

23. September 11, 2007, DIEGO MONTOYA - ALLEGED DRUG KINGPIN ARRESTED IN COLOMBIA. The alleged leader of the Norte del Valle cartel, Colombia's most dangerous drug gang, was arrested in western Colombia. MONTOYA, known as Don Diego was on the FBI's 10 MOST WANTED LIST with a reward of up to $5 million for his arrest. If MONTOYA is extradited to the USA, his sentence WILL BE LIMITED TO 30 YEARS, AS COLOMBIA DOES NOT ALLOW MORE THAN A 30-YEAR SENTENCE THAT HAS BEEN ENFORCED WITHIN THE UNITED USA. See, U.S. vs. GALLO-CHAMORRO, 48 F.3d 502, 503 (11th Cir.1995); U.S. vs. ABELLO-SILVA, 948 F.2nd 1168, 1174 (10th Cir. 1991). PLEASE NOTE: The USA cannot legally extradite MONTOYA, as the only sentence he could receive in the USA is LIFE. COLOMBIA nor the USA can enter into an agreement to ALTER AND/OR AMEND A U.S. CRIMINAL STATUTE AS DEFINED BY THE U.S. CONGRESS. Please review John Gregory Lambros' April 05, 2007, letter to "THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM", which appears within paragraph 18 of this section above, for an overview of illegal acts being performed by the U.S. Department of State in extraditing persons illegally from countries to USA. See, USA TODAY, September 11, 2007, Page 10A.

24. January 22, 2008, letter to "THE FLORIDA BAR" by John G. Lambros, requesting an update as to all actions taken by "THE FLORIDA BAR" in their investigation of Florida lawyer Andrea G. Hoffman, Court I.D. #A5500885. See Lambros' April 5, 2007 letter and complaint to "THE FLORIDA BAR." Lambros' January 22, 2008 letter was received on January 28, 2008 and copy was returned.

DOWNLOAD JANUARY 22, 2008 LETTER TO "THE FLORIDA BAR", HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

25. February 06, 2008, MANUEL FELIPE SALAZAR-ESPINOSA - described by the U.S. Government as one of the world's biggest drug lords - was sentenced to thirty (30) years in prison for tons of cocaine entering U.S.A. by Judge Lewis Kaplan, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Salazar-Espinosa was arrested in Colombia and extradited to the USA. PLEASE NOTE: Extradition treaty with Colombia was honored in limiting the maximum sentence to thirty (30) years, when Salazar-Espinosa could only of received a life sentence under U.S. laws. Colombia does not allow more than a 30-year sentence. See, U.S. vs. GALLO-CHAMORRO, 48 F-3d 502, 503 (11th Cir. 1995); U.S. vs. ABELLO-SILVA, 948 F.2d 1168, 1174 (10th Cir. 1991).

DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 06, 2008 ARTICLE FROM USA TODAY, PAGE 3A, HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

25. February 06, 2008, MANUEL FELIPE SALAZAR-ESPINOSA - described by the U.S. Government as one of the world's biggest drug lords - was sentenced to thirty (30) years in prison for tons of cocaine entering U.S.A. by Judge Lewis Kaplan, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Salazar-Espinosa was arrested in Colombia and extradited to the USA. PLEASE NOTE: Extradition treaty with Colombia was honored in limiting the maximum sentence to thirty (30) years, when Salazar-Espinosa could only of received a life sentence under U.S. laws. Colombia does not allow more than a 30-year sentence. See, U.S. vs. GALLO-CHAMORRO, 48 F-3d 502, 503 (11th Cir. 1995); U.S. vs. ABELLO-SILVA, 948 F.2d 1168, 1174 (10th Cir. 1991).

DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 06, 2008 ARTICLE FROM USA TODAY, PAGE 3A, HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

26. February 23, 2008, MANUEL FELIPE SALAZAR-ESPINOSA - Attorney's LAWRENCE MURRAY HERRMANN and LINDA GEORGE. Lambros wrote Mr. Salazar-Espinosa's attorneys, as listed within his docket sheet - USA vs. MANUEL FELIPE SALAZAR-ESPINOSA, Criminal Docket No. 1:05-cr-517-LAK-1, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Foley Square). Lambros informs SALAZAR-ESPINOSA's legal team that Judge Lewis Kaplan gave their client too much time - over 30 years - as the Judge sentenced their client to a term of SUPERVISED RELEASE over an above the 30-years term the Colombian Supreme Court allows as a criminal penalty in every extradition. Three page letter with exhibit.

DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 23, 2008 LETTER TO ATTORNEY HERRMANN & ATTORNEY GEORGE, HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

27. MAY 24, 2008, DAINER CAMACHO-BENITZ - Lambros wrote CAMACHO-BENITEZ Attorney Hugo A. Rodriguez, Miami Beach, Florida, as to CAMACHO-BENITEZ extradition from Colombia to the United States in March 2008, in criminal action USA vs. RAYO-MONTANO, et al., Criminal Docket No. 1:06-cr-20139-DMM-ALL, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Miami). Lambros requests Attorney Rodriguez to submit a MOTION TO THE COURT stating that his client may not be sentenced to a penalty exceeding thirty (30) years INCLUDING THE TERM OF SUPERVISED RELEASE. The letter was mailed U.S. Certified Mail No. 7005-3110-0003-4742-4904. This letter is a four (4) pages with an one (1) page exhibit.

DOWNLOAD MAY 24, 2008 LETTER TO ATTORNEY RODRIGUEZ, HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

28. June 03, 2008, Consulado General de Colombia, Attention Paulina Gomez B. U.S. Certified Mail No. 7005-3110-0003-4742-1682. Lambros wrote the Consulate General for Colombia, Chicago, Illinois requesting an investigation into the illegal conduct of United States Assistant Attorney's when they request extraditions of persons from Colombia. U.S. Attorney's and Judges have been sentencing persons extradited from Colombia to sentences of MORE THAN THIRTY (30) YEARS WHEN THEY INCLUDE THE TERM OF "SUPERVISED RELEASE" IN ADDITION TO THE TERM OF IMPRISONMENT. The Supreme Court of Colombia always includes within the resolution within every extradition decree that a person "MUST NOT be sentenced to prison for more than thirty (30) years." If a person extradited from Colombia to the U.S. violates the conditions of his SUPERVISED RELEASE, the court may revoke his "SUPERVISED RELEASE" AND SEND HIM BACK TO PRISON FOR THE TERN OF "SUPERVISED RELEASE". See, U.S. vs. ROBERTS, 5 F.3d 365, 368-369 (9th Cir. 1993). This letter is three (3) pages with two (2) pages of exhibit, total of 5 pages.

DOWNLOAD JUNE 03, 2008 LETTER TO CONSULDADO GENERAL de COLUMBIA, HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

29. November 17, 2008, LUIS IGNACIO GUZMAN, Consul General for Colombia. Lambros writes Consul General Guzman thanking him for responding to his June 03, 2008 letter and offers additional law as to persons being sentenced to MORE than thirty (30) years when the term of "SUPERVISED RELEASE" is included within the term of imprisonment. Therefore, an injury in fact to all persons extradited from Colombia to the United States, as per the extradition decrees by the Colombian Supreme Court. Colombia is also advised of the current extradition of PABLO JOAQUIN RAYO-MONTANO, a citizen of Colombia, from Brazil to the USA and Brazil's Supreme Court's past failure to enforce a thirty (30) year criminal sentence when extraditing persons to the United States. Consul Guzman's July 30, 2008 letter is attached as an exhibit. See, U.S. vs. ETHERTON, 101 F.3d 80, 81 (9th Cir. 1996) ("it is the original sentence that is executed when the defendant is returned to prison after a violation of the terms of ... SUPERVISED RELEASE"). This letter is five (5) pages with four (4) pages of exhibits, total of 9 pages.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 17, 2008 LETTER TO CONSUL GENERAL GUZMAN OF COLOMBIA, HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

30. March 2, 2009 - LAMBROS REQUESTS MIAMI FEDERAL COURT to allow Petition of Intervention or alternatively Amicus Curiae brief regarding extradition cases from COLOMBIA, BRAZIL, and VENEZUELA, as to the question of law: "Whether the term of SUPERVISED RELEASE must be included within the maximum thirty (30) year sentence limitation as expressed in extradition orders and treaties?" This motion was submitted within the case, USA vs. PABLO JOAQUIN RAYO-MONTANO, DAINER CAMACHO-BENITEZ, et al., Criminal Docket No. 1:06-cr-20139-DMM, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Miami). This Motion is 11 pages with 6 pages of exhibits and a cover letter to the Court, total of 18 pages.

DOWNLOAD MARCH 2, 2009 MOTION OF INTERVENTION - AMICUS CURIAE TO COURT, HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD APRIL 9, 2009, ORDER BY JUDGE MIDDLEBROOKS STATING THAT LAMBROS IS NOT INVITED AS AMICUS CURIAE NOR DOES LAMBROS HAVE STANDING TO INTERVENE, HERE IN PDF FORMAT - ONE (1) PAGE.

31. AUGUST 7, 2009 - LORETTA A. PRESKA, U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, for the Southern District of New York, REFUSES TO FILE "JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A PETITION OF INTERVENTION - OR ALTERNATIVELY - JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF. Dated July 29, 2009." Lambros raises the question of law: "Whether the term of SUPERVISED RELEASE must be included within the maximum thirty (30) year sentence limitation as expressed in extradition ORDERS and TREATIES from COLOMBIA." This motion and refusal to file order was submitted in case USA vs. DANIEL RENDON-HERRERA, FREDDY ENRIQUE RENDON-HERRERA, JHON JAIRO RENDON-HERRERA, DIEGO RIVAS-ANGEL, DATRO ANTONIO USUGA-DAVID, JUAN DE DIOS USUGADAVID, criminal docket numbers 04-CR-962 (LAP) and 08-CR-659 (SAS). This ORDER, MOTION and exhibits is a total of 30 pages.

DOWNLOAD AUGUST 7, 2009 ORDER & MOTION OF INTERVENTION - AMICUS CURIAE TO COURT, HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD COPY OF INDICTMENT IN USA vs. DANIEL RENDON-HERRERA, et al., HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD COPY OF APRIL 21, 2009 "PRESS RELEASE" BY U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE IN USA vs. DANIEL RENDON-HERRERA, et al., Southern District of New York, HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD COPY OF DECEMBER 10, 2009, LETTER FROM "BIBIANA GOMEZ JARAMILLO, Consul de Colombia en Boston" TO LAMBROS, AS TO RECEIPT OF MOTION FILED IN THIS ACTION VIA U.S. CERTIFIED MAIL. The letter is in spanish and states the Consul will forward Lambros' motion to the Attorney General of Colombia for review, lega analysis and response to Lambros. The letter is one (1) page. HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

32. OCTOBER 05, 2009 - EMMET G. SULLIVAN, U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, for the District of Columbia, REFUSES TO FILE "JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A PETITION OF INTERVENTION - OR ALTERNATIVELY - JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS' MOTION TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF," dated September 14, 2009. Lambros raises the question of law "Whether the term of "SUPERVISED RELEASE" must be included within the maximum thirty (30) year sentence limitation as expressed in extradition ORDERS from COLOMBIA, BRAZIL, and VENEZUELA. This motion and refusal to file order was submitted in the case of USA vs. WILBER ALIRITO VARELA, DIEGO LEON MONTOYA-SANCHEZ, LUIS HERNANDO GOMEZ-BUSTAMANTE, ARCANGEL HENAO-MONTOYA, JUAN CARLOS RAMIREZ-ABADIA (arrested in Brazil & awaiting extradition), CARLOS ALBERTO RENTERIA-MANTILLA, GABRIEL PUERTA-PARRA, JORGE ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ-ACERO, and JAIRO APARICIO-LENIS, criminal docket number 04-126. This ORDER, MOTION and EXHIBITS are a total of 31 pages. Please note that the article from the August 8, 2007 - USA TODAY, as to JUAN CARLOS RAMIREZ-ABADIA arrest in Brazil is located on the last page of the motion, as an exhibit.

DOWNLOAD SEPTEMBER 14, 2009 MOTION OF INTERVENTION -AMICUS CURIAE TO COURT AND JUDGE SULLIVAN'S DENIAL ON OCTOBER 5, 2009, HERE TN PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD COPY OF INDICTMENT IN USA vs. WILBER ALIRIO VARELA, et al. (26 Pages), IN PDF FORMAT.

DOWNLOAD COPY OF NOVEMBER 21, 2009 LETTER TO JUAN CARLOS RAMIREZ-ABADIA ATTORNEY'S "ALEXEI SCHACHT" AND "PAUL R. NALVEN" FROM LAMBROS. THIS LETTER IS TWO (2) PAGES IN PDF FORMAT.

33. November 5, 2009, article "ITALY RULES IN RENDITION CASE - Court Convicts 23 U.S. Operatives of Milan Kidnapping of Iman". Twenty-two (22) CIA operatives and an Air Force Official, all tried in absentia, received prison sentences. Judge Oscar Magi, issued an order for the immediate arrest of the convicted operatives, as a European Union arrest warrant for the 23 U.S. intelligence operatives is already outstanding. Two (2) Italian intelligence agents were also convicted and sentenced to three (3) years. OF INTEREST: The U.S. thinks it is legal to KIDNAP INDIVIDUALS FROM ANOTHER COUNTRY, AS THE U.S. SUPREME COURT STATES IT IS LEGAL IF THE EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE U.S. AND ANOTHER COUNTRY DOES NOT PROHIBIT ABDUCTIONS. See, U.S. vs. ALVAREZ-MACHAIN, 119 L.Ed.2d 441 (1992). Again, the U.S. thinks it can do any thing it wants when it wants!!!! Attached for your review is the November 5, 2009, article "ITALY RULES IN RENDITION CASE from THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, Page A12 and a comprehensive text statement of law from the "AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE", EXTRADITION, 25 - Kidnap of individual from asylum nation. Total of two (2) pages.

DOWNLOAD ARTICLE ON "ITALY RULES IN RENDITION CASE" AND U.S LEGAL CASE THAT SUPPORT LEGAL ABDUCTION BY U.S. OFFICIALS OUTSIDE THE U.S., IN PDF FORMAT.

34. November 19, 2009, CESARE BATTISTI. Brazil's Chief Supreme Court Judge Gilmar Mendes broke a tie among the Supreme Court Justices to extradite former guerrilla Cesare Battisti to face murder charges in Italy. AGAIN, BRAZIL WILL NOT ENFORCE THE 30-YEAR MAXIMUM SENTENCE IN EXTRADITION CASES, AS BATTISTI FACES A LIFE SENTENCE FOR FOUR MURDERS HE WAS CONVICTED OF IN ABSENTIA. Attached for your review is THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, November 19, 2009, Page A16, article "FORMER GUERRILLA BATTISTI FACES EXTRADITION TO ITALY", one (1) page.

DOWNLOAD NOVEMBER 19, 2009, CESARE BATTISTI ARTICLE. HERE IN PDF.

35. January 5, 2010, ROMAN POLANSKI STILL FREE ON BAIL IN EXTRADITION CASE. On September 26, 2009, ROMAN POLANSKI was arrested in Zurich, Switzerland on U.S. charges. In November 2009 Swiss authorities gave POLANSKI bail for his release from a Swiss jail while the U.S. prepares for extradition hearings. Of interest, John Gregory Lambros and other U.S. Citizens being extradited from Brazil are NEVER ALLOWED bail hearings while awaiting extradition hearings. The following articles will help you follow POLANSKI's extradition proceedings:

DOWNLOAD ARTICLE "POLANSKI LOSES BID TO BE HELD UNDER HOUSE ARREST", DATED OCTOBER 7, 2009 - THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, IN PDF FORMAT.

36. FEBRUARY 19, 2010 - HUGO CHAVEZ, President of Venezuela: This is the letter John Gregory Lambros wrote President Chavez as to "INJURY IN FACT" being committed by the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Justice IN NOT HONORING EXTRADITION DECREES FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF VENEZUELA IN EXTRADITION PROCEEDINGS TO THE UNITED STATES. Venezuela does not allow a criminal sentence greater than 30-YEARS and the Supreme Court of Venezuela states in every extradition decree that the person will not be sentenced to more than 30-YEARS. When the extradited person from Venezuela reaches the U.S. Court system they are given sentences greater than 30-YEARS. - CRISTOBAL RODRIGUEZ BENITEZ, 19-years to life - Lambros also offers case law that GRANTS BAIL WHEN THE U.S. REQUESTS EXTRADITION OF PERSONS IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES. See Page 9 of letter. Lambros requests President Chavez to contact his Attorney General - LUISA ORTEGA DIAZ - to AMEND the U.S.-Venezuela Extradition Treaty to incorporate a penalty clause of $100,000.00 per-day for all breaches to agreed-upon sentencing limitations (30-year sentences). Page 9 & 10 of the letter suggests six (6) amendments to the treaty. This letter is a total of 11-pages with 9-pages of exhibits. Exhibit E. is the June 4, 1993 letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to John G. Lambros' attorney stating that a sentence of MANDATORY LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE is NOT BARRED by the SPECIALTY DOCTRINE, as to Lambros' extradition from Brazil - Brazilian law does not allow criminal sentences greater than 30-YEARS. Lambros received a sentence of MANDATORY LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE. See, U.S. vs. LAMBROS, 65 F.3d 698 (8th Cir. 1995).

DOWNLOAD FEBRUARY 19, 2010 LETTER TO PRESIDENT HUGO CHAVEZ THAT WAS MAILED U.S. CERTIFIED MAIL AND RECEIVED BY AMBASSADOR BERNARDO ALVARAREZ HERRERA ON FEBRUARY 23, 2010, HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

37. December 16, 2010 - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange: LONDON - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange - AN AUSTRALIAN CITIZEN - was granted bail on December 14, 2010, as he awaits a court hearing on whether he will be EXTRADITED TO SWEDEN, but remained in jail because the ruling was appealed. Assange, 39 was not allowed to post the $316,000 bail because Swedish prosecutors asked BRITAIN'S HIGH COURT TO OVERTURN THE DECISION. Judge Howard Riddle of Westminster Magistrate Court overrode the decision he made a week earlier in granting bail to Assange. On December 16, 2010, BRITAIN'S HIGH COURT freed Julian Assange on BAIL from a warrant for his EXTRADITION TO SWEDEN. Lawyer Gemma Lindfield, acting for Sweden, told Britain's High Court Justice DUNCAN OUSELEY that Assange's nomadic lifestyle and loose ties to those promising bond made him "a real risk" to flee. JULIAN ASSANGE IS LUCKY THAT HE WAS NOT VISITING BRAZIL, AS HE WOULD NOT OF RECEIVED A BAIL HEARING OR BAIL FOR EXTRADITION TO SWEDEN. JOHN LAMBROS NOR ANY OTHER PERSON BEING EXTRADITED FROM BRAZIL HAS RECEIVED A BAIL HEARING OR BAIL. BRAZIL CONTINUES TO BREAK INTERNATIONAL LAWS!!!! The following article will help you follow ASSANGE'S extradition proceedings.

DOWNLOAD ARTICLE "WikiLeaks Secret-Spiller Free on Bail in London" by Associated Press, Printed in USA TODAY, December 17, 2010, Page 8A. HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

38. November 17, 2011 - PORTUGAL WON'T GIVE UP FUGITIVE TO U.S.: George Wright, 68, will not be extradited to the United States for hijacking of a jet to Algeria in 1972 and conspiracy to murder during a gas station robbery in 1962. Wright admitted the plane hijacking but said he committed it a a militant member of the BLACK LIBERATION ARMY "to fight for black rights." U.S. Justice Department spokeswoman Laura Sweeney said U.S. Officials are "extremely disappointed," calling Wright a convicted murder.

DOWNLOAD ARTICLE "PORTUGAL WON'T GIVE UP FUGITIVE TO U.S.", U.S.A. TODAY, November 18, 2011, HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

39. DECEMBER 7, 2011 - AMERICAN CONVICTED IS MEXICO OF DRUG TRAFFICING WAS TORTURED WHILE IN MEXICAN CUST0DY WAS FREED BY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE: Shohn Huckabee, 24 and his friend Carlos Quijas were arrested and convicted of drug trafficking in Mexico in December 2009. The U.S. Department of Justice determined U.S. citizens Huckabee and Quijas were tortured by electric shock, beatings and threats of death after being arrested for marijuana. Huckabee was transferred to the U.S. and released under a treaty signed between the U.S. and Mexico. The U.S. Department of Parole Commission "reduced the five (5) year sentence given to Huckabee by a Mexican Judge, and released him with 'time served' or 26 months,". The article reported possible tensions between Washington and Mexico City over how Mexico is pursuing the drug war. Under terms of the MERIDA INITIATIVE, THE $1.4 BILLION AID PACKAGE GIVEN TO MEXICO AND CENTRAL AMERICAN GOVERNMENTS TO FIGHT DRUGS, MEXICO COULD LOSE 15% OF THE AID IF THERE IS EVIDENCE OF HUMAN-RIGHTS VIOLATIONS. A spokesman for Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R., Texas), warned Tuesday that the STATE DEPARTMENT "SHOULD BE VERY CAREFULLY VETTING MERIDA FUNDING, " AND ASKED THAT IT "INVESTIGATE THE REPORTED TORTURE OF SHOHN HUCKABEE." Johanna Markind, assistant general counsel of the U.S. Parole Commission, said that in cases involving international transfers such as Mr. Huckabee, the foreign government provides documentation of the case, BUT IS NOT TYPICALLY ASKED FOR ITS VERSION OF EVENTS IF THERE IS AN ALLEGATION SUCH AS TORTURE. - Now John Gregory Lambros understands how the bullshit within the U.S. Department of State works - it took the U.S. Parole Commission to investigate the torture allegation by Huckabee and Quijas that the U.S. Department of State refused to investigate or as usual just COVERED UP!!!! PLEASE NOTE: U.S. Federal Judge Diana E. Murphy issued a SUBPOENA ON JANUARY 11, 1993 FOR MARGARET MURPHY, Counsel General, U.S. Embassy Brasilia, TO APPEAR ON JANUARY 14, 1993, IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA, COURTROOM THREE (3) AT 9:00 a.m. TO TESTIFY AS TO THE TORTURE OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS BY BRAZILIAN MILITARY AND FEDERAL POLICE DURING HIS EXTRADITION TO THE UNITED STATES. Margaret Murphy DID NOT appear nor forward "ANY AND ALL RECORDS RELATING TO JOHN LAMBROS." Lambros has now been incarcerated for more than 20-years due to Margaret Murphy refusing to testify as to John Gregory Lambros' torture in Brazil during extradition. Just another NAZI within the U.S. Department of State.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD COPY OF SUBPOENA FOR MARGARET MURPHY TO TESTIFY AS TO THE TORTURE OF JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS WITHIN THIS WEBSITE.

DOWNLOAD ARTICLE "U.S. SAYS MEXICO TORTURED AMERICAN IN CUSTODY", BY NICHOLAS CASEY, Printed in THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, December 7, 2011, Page A15. HERE IN PDF FORMAT.

40. February 22, 2012 - NEW ZEALAND GIVES BAIL To PERSON AWAITING EXTRADITION TO UNITED STATES - BRAZIL DOES NOT!!!

Kim Dotcom, the founder to website Megaupload.com, has been released on BAIL in New Zealand as he awaits a decision on whether he will be extradited to the U.S. to face RACKETEERING, MONEY LAUNDERING, COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT- AND WIRE FRAUD CHARGES. Six (6) other persons charged within the same indictment have already been released on bail awaiting extradition to the U.S. Kim Dotcom is a German citizen and holds Finnish citizenship. U.S. Lawyer Ira P. Rothken represents Kim Dotcom within his extradition and federal charges in Virginia.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD ARTICLES "Megaupload's Dotcom free until hearing_- Judge: Not a flight risk pending decision on extradition to U.S.", by Yvonne van Dongen, USA TODAY, February 22, 2012. Also, "Megaupload.com's Founder Kim Dotcom, GRANTED BAIL", by Lucy Craymer and Geoffrey A. Fowler, Wall Street Journal, February 22, 2012 IN PDF FORMAT.

Copyright 1996-2012 by John Gregory Lambros. All rights reserved.

PERMISSION to reprint or redistribute any or all of the contents of the BOYCOTT BRAZIL web site is hereby granted. We ask that any use of these materials include proper credit and, where appropriate, a link to the BOYCOTT BRAZIL web site. If your publication customarily pays for publication, BOYCOTT BRAZIL requests checks payable to JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS in the form of a donation. If your publication does not pay for materials, you are free to use the material gratis. In all cases, we request notification for our records, including physical copies where material has appeared in print. Contact: JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS, #00436-124, USP Leavenworth, 1300 Metropolitan Ave, Leavenworth, Kansas 66048-1000 USA. THANK YOU.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work within
this web site message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for
non-profit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.
edu/uscode/17/107.shtml]

The address for this homepage (Boycott Brazil) is:
http://www.brazilboycott.org


Click here to go back to the top of the page.